this rule so we will say that mary jo white once opposed the rules through and then deal with them bester protections later however as. i don't know if the rule even protects investors or not well that's that's up for debate because the funny thing about this rule is that when it comes to raising capital in the private markets when you have a general solicitation you can advertise on the company's website you can advertise in print but this doesn't necessarily mean that the protections will be afforded for accredited investors. i mean why does it really matter and incredible investor in this in this instance has to have an annual income of greater than two hundred thousand dollars or a net worth of greater than a million dollars exact so basically you have to be rich to be an investor and you . know you don't have to be rich to be an investor to be an uncredited investor but the whole point here is that you know if you're going to be an increase if you're going to be an accredited investor you don't necessarily have to be rich but what i think the real question of the day is. have a bank

do you think it will be a block bester? >> there is a huge need in prostate cancer.y it's the largest need in medicine today for men's health. with over 240,000 men diagnosed each year, about half of them will be low risk patients. the problem we have today is most of these men are going on for aggressive treatment to include surgery and radiation. with those treatments comes life-long side effects that are life debilitating and life-changing. the goal behind the test is to be able to figure out which of these 100,000 or so men that have low-risk disease can confidently select active surveillance as their mode of treatment versus going on for aggressive surgery and radiation. >> is there a bigger market for this or is this simply for prostate cancer? can you use it for other types of cancers? >> the approach has gone across three cancers. we are looking at hundreds of thousands of patients diagnosed with early stage cancers. definitely as we look to the era of being able to sequence the human genome and understand the biology of disease, we are seeing biology matters

i want you to -- read an excerpt of an e-mail that bester stevens sent to you.the e-mail concerned a draft cable intended to request an extension of security personnel for the embassy which was ultimately sent on july 9. the ambassador wrote, gentlemen , i have taken a close look at the cable and edited it down and rearranged some paragraphs. my tension is to give more focus to what we are doing to end our reliance on tty support -- tdy rsupport. if it looks ok, please run it by ds and see if they wante it. can you briefly splay and what ambassador stephens meant -- explain what ambassador stephens meant when he said to run it by ds and see if they wanted front channel? >> the process by which we would send an official state department cable. i might have done that for prior requests. it was my advice to the ambassador that we do in fact send that front channel. within the departments, that is considered to be the official record. if i send something by e-mail or informally, it is still valuable, but unless it is on that cable, it is not official. my experience

and i think members on both sides of the aisle want these programs to bestered in a responsible and fair way. in addition to that washington has a spending problem. for 55 of the last 0eu6r years we've spent more money than we've brought in. that's why we have a nearly $17 trillion national debt. we have members who believe spending is spending even though it may be a very good purpose. so between these two groups of members and frankly i would sates a a bipartisan group on each side, congress has to act. that debate will continue. it's a healthy debate and ought to continue. >> on the student loan issue, the senate has a different approach, the president has a different approach and they are going to make the house approach look like a way to raise student loan rates. how can you win this fight before july 1 or ultimately are you being backed again into a political corner? >> listen, i think what the house is doing today is a responsible way to deal honestly with the issue of student loans. can somebody politicized this on the other side of the aisle? certainly they can. but mistaked we