be they people who believe in bestiality.ou are in the same sentence equating same-sex marriage with things that are illegal. >> well, as i said, i just explained what my intention was. >> angela, ben carson says his remarks were taken out of context. does he still need to explain how they were taken out of context? >> no, jonathan. we don't care how they were out of context. one very critical thing i think i want to mention to the good doctor, as lawyer, there are two pieces he is missing when it comes to bestiality and pedophilia, and that is consent. there's a total difference between two consenting adults and folks that are practicing pedophilia and bestiality. it is highly problematic that that is the reference that he chose. particularly because dr. carson relies so heavy on his christi n christiani christianity. i'm not here to judge is, especially good friday, and as a christian myself. we continue to see the etch loose of christianity turn into a judgment zone when the basis of the faith is supposed to be love. i'm g

i wish i could see the survey person going down the list and getting to bestiality and go -- bestialitys. and the one guy is like, no, no. ah, i am going over here with my survey now. >> how could they cover a story with 40 people in which they used percentages when it is only one person? >> we used to have an internet newspaper in the late 90s. we had a standing headline. this is nonsense. if it is college kids talking about their sex life, how come we have 3% bestiality? you lie constantly and you over exaggerate constantly. >> it is yale. >> i will not sit here and have you defend yale. >> that's literally what the bestiality guy said. >> last word, jet do dye yaw. >> i went to an ivy league school and i wouldn't be surprised if some of this crazy stuff was going on. i heard a lot of stories in my day. ivy league more like ivy beagle. >> i am not surprised that a person who went to the ivy league mentioned he went to the ivy league. well, well, well. >> i want to open a bar called the ivy league. what am i saying? i will close things out with a post game wrap up. clips of rentes show

it is about bestiality. come back and i will say more. have you read my blog? >> we will come back with a wrap up.

gay marriage compared to murder and bestiality? justices are supposed to be like umpires.ling balls and strikes. but scalia, he's not even in the right ballpark. joining me now, jimmy williams and david corn. thank you both for being on the show. >> sure thing. >> thank you. >> jimmy, let me go to you first. it doesn't seem like scalia is an impartial umpire, now, does it? >> no, reverend, no. he's not very impartial. out of the all the things that you just listed that he has compared homosexuality to as a certified, organic homosexual on national tv, i have not done any of those things. i have a dog, but i've never had sex with my dog. because i'm normal. just like everybody else. and for that man to go around saying things like racial entitlement, bestiality, et cetera, et cetera, it's farcical. i wrote a column back in november -- back a couple weeks ago when he did this thing on racial entitlement. i said in the column i thought i was hearing a justice of the supreme court from the 1960s or from the 19th century. this is a man that is out of touch with reality by choic

so it's not something that's against gays. >> gay, bestiality supporters, whoever, you're all basically the same and you don't get to change the definition of marriage. dr. ben carson, your party thanks you for this elegant clarification. so the saga continues to playing the gop, perhaps comprehending that multiple parties and not the best approach, house speaker boehner kept his head down, never minding the whole doma thing is something he is paying for. >> listen, this is a very divisive issue, and i respect everyone's opinion. it was to make sure that the proper forum was used to make sure that we know what's constitutional and what isn't. >> let's bring in susie orman, host of the susie orman show, and congressman sean patrick. thank you for joining me. >> susie, i'm getting a muscle cramp from watching republicans twist themselves into pretzels over the subject of marriage. here is a guy who is dedicated to defending $1 million in court, and he doesn't want to defend it. >> here's the thing. if you ever really ask any of these people that how do they really feel about it, they then

especially in what rick santorum said about bestiality.never said that and neither did dr. carson. >> yes, he did. >> did he not. >> megyn: did do so more than sotomayor, equated gay marriage with incestual relationships? he she didn't mean to say there is he' moral equivalence between gays and incestual relationships. >> it's apples and oranges and-- >> it's not it's the supreme court. >> megyn: let him finish and i'll give you the floor in a minute, ben. >> she was asking a question and it's often justices play devil's advocates and they probe, she was asking a question. ben carson was expressing an opinion and by lumping it in, given the past history of the comparisons between these groups, it's deeply repugnant and for one basic reason, we're talking about-- >> does it matter that he came out and apologized for his choice of words. >> yes, actually it does and i give him credit for that. at that took some courage. and some humility to come out and sort of say that's not what i intended, but no escaping, these are loaded terms, loaded c

no group be they gays, be they nambla, be they people who believe in bestiality. doesn't matter what they are. >> jon: let me stop you right there it's not whether you are having sex with a consenting adult or a horse or a doughnut. it's all the same. that's not fair. he's fine. his problem isn't with gay people. >> it's not something against gays, it's against anybody who wants to come along and change the fundamental definitions of pillars ever society. >> jon: you think we shouldn't mess with anything that is a fundamental pillar of society. black neurosurgeon who does proudly stand in front of a medical school, the road to that school is broken pillar parts labored slavery, segregation and jim-crow and there's a gay sad looking nearby and in tact pillar that says traditional marriage and a thought bubble that says little help? let me show you. that's just um, i drew this is -- [cheers and applause] anyway that is my idea for the editorial cartoon. this is just a penis cannon shooting an airplane because it's all i really know how to draw. we'll be right back.

. >> no group, be they gays, be they people who believe in bestiality, it doesn't matter what they are get to change the definition. so it's not something that's against gays. >> well, dr. carson is a good guy, but that is way off the bite. anyway, the party's bright new star there is comparing people -- consenting adult relationships to nanbla which is about predatory people, an advocating group that pushes for sex with children and also talking about bestiality there. sam stein is with the "washington post." and michael crowley of "time" this week's cover, two guys kiss, an alternative position of two women. who are you doing with this magazine? why this week after all this time of being tame "time"? >> we had a breast-feeding cover that caused a stir a year ago. our covers have been wonderfully provocative. why now? the point of the story is, however the court rules, we have reached, we have crossed a cultural rubicon. >> dr. carson, they're comparing a gay loving relationship between two adults with animal sex, with whatever, with predatory or whatever. >> i thought it was pretty u

be they people who believe in bestiality, you are in the same sentence, equating same-sex marriage with are illegal. >> well, as i said, i just explained what my intention was. and if that is the way that people are taking it, that was certainly not the intention. >> when you say you believe in a christian in legal arrangements for people of the same jebder. it's been made clear in the supreme court that there are 1100 federal statutes which apply only to people who are married. so that people of the same gender can have their civil unions, they can have legal arrangements, but they do not have the same tax advantages, social security benefits, 1100 tangible benefits that are available only to people who are legally married. >> well again, i say i feel that any two adults be they gay, straight, whatever, should have the right to make legal arrangements so that they can transfer property and have those rights. they certainly have the freedom of association. when do we stop allowing people freedom of association? >> well frankly under laws as recently as several decades ago interracial ma

he is developing a new study in animal research called bestiality. >> you are terrible. >> what? >> i don't know if that is true. i will just say that. i would love to discuss politics with a slow loris. i fear the slow loris will not discuss politics with me. there is one right there. i am dying to find out what that guy is thinking. that's the greatest. >> bill, i was curious, who would you want to tweet with or interface with on the web? >> what is the perfect man gnaw fess station of humans and animals coming together on-line than our old for example sex-manimal. can we have a clip, please? we have kind of a dude, but also kind of an antelope and that is what peter gabriel was talking about after he ate his hash brown. there he is as a greyhound. >> the thing is i go back to -- like what could piss off an animal on-line? like if you are talking about molting or something. you can create a whole other area of anxiety. >> high pitch bros. high pitch buzz. >> we have nothing to learn. >> they have nothing to tell us except how tasty we are. >> we are quite good little animal. sh

anywhere else, interest rates hovering 2%, there is no real place to put your money, this is the bestial ter thattive out there and -- alternative out there, and since the government threats have turned out to be fake, with no ramification, people are saying it is not as risky to invest in stocks any more. get your yield from stocks not government treasures that is what we're seeing today, although very much unlike 2007, very broad that suggests there is more to come. neil: if there is more to come, history suggestions there is not a lot more, in most circumstances where the dow hits a record, it is a punch waited moment that is -- punch waiting moment that is often followed by something bad. remember early highs and 1987, and remember what happened in fall of 87. same with early 1929, and fall of 1929. market has a way of celebrating the good, and soon there after looking at something pretty bad, what do you think now? >> we have short-term memory on some black swan events that cost people billions upon billions of dollars, joe is right, most visit investors were taking a defensive post

no group, be the gays, be the namla, be the people who believe in bestiality, it doesn't matter what they are, they don't get to change the definition. >> what about the ones that immigrate to this country that allows multiple spouses? >> if same sex fits the bill of the contract, then everything fits the bill and at some point who's to say you cannot have sex with a child at some point? >> how about condemning that language? today another reminder the gop has gone from the party of lincoln to the party of limbaugh. joining me now is congressman bill nadler, democrat from new york and melissa harris-perry. thank you both for being here. >> absolutely. >> congressman, as we showed, your republican colleagues in the house came out strong condemning and taking their shots at congressman young's comments today. but we keep seeing this ugliness come out. where do you see this rebranding we keep hearing about? >> well, they are trying but the problem is that it's one thing to change your rhetoric when you don't change your beliefs and you don't change your practice and your rhetoric is har

. >> i'm going to go with bestiality because obviously that's why gay marriage leads to so if you want to be in front of this more liberal country you will probably need to be in front of that. >> john: best thing about letting a man marry an animal, they'll never reproduce. last night on the show, we talked about the wave of republicans who have seen the light on marriage equality. and that light is a flashing sign that says 2014, 2016. of some our o republican friends don't like to hear that because they contend plenty of democrats like bill clinton and barack obama have evolved on gay marriage too. now, as nice as it is for me to hear an american conservative mention the word evolution in a positive sense, i gotta tell you, all homophobes aren't created equal. take former president bill clinton. yes, did he sign the defense of marriage act into law back in 1996. yes, that was a bad homophobic law that wrote discrimination into the fabric of our history. as tim gunn might say parts of that fabric are hideous. make it work. clinton was the first president to openly court lgbt american

and now when you hear him talk about bestiality and pedophilia in the same sentence with two consentingment, i mean, there could be not two things that are more different. i mean, he's the best living, breathing example of what's wrong with the anti-marriage equality argument. >> francesca, even beyond that, it seems it was another week for, you know, republicans saying silly things. we had the alaska congressman to apologize for his comment that i won't use on the air once again. and then you have ben carson having to walk back some comments as well. at what point do republicans figure out that, you know, maybe you should think before you speak? >> i don't think it's fair to limit it just to republicans. >> well, this week it's fair. this week i think it's fair. >> this week there was a democratic congressman as well who made an offensive tweet about the trail of tears in reference to a basketball game. i think you have to look at that, too. that it's not just republicans who have issues with messaging sometimes. >> i wasn't talking about twitter. i was actually talking about the spoke

. >> no group be they gays, be they namla, be they people who believe in bestiality, it doesn't matter get to change the definition. it's not something that's against gays. >> he said nambla. republicans aren't doing themselves any favors. alexander burns writes in politico, that on marriage equality, the republican party has positioned itself at odds with young, educated and politically independent voters and he argues, the only obvious way to square that political circle in the short-term is by a sweeping supreme court decision. until the issue is settled once and for all, conservative intolerance will dominate the discussion and continue to alienate people from their party. aside from the fact we're talking about namla and people who want to marry animals, would it be better for the republican party, for conservatism, if the supreme court took the issue across the table and decided marriage equality for the country. >> would it be better for the republicans? >> in the sense it would take it off the political stage. on the political stage, it isn't help them at all. >> this is one of

established fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they people who believe in bestialityatter what they are. they don't get to change the definition. today he addressed those comments on "andrea mitchell reports." >> once we start changing the definitions, then where do we stop? we can go with anything. and i certainly don't have any problem with people who are gay having legal arrangements. in fact, any two adults. gay, straight, whatever. certainly they can have legal arrangements so they can share property and have inheritance rights and visitation rights. that's a kind thing to do. they should be treated just as anyone else. but being treated as anyone else no, one else gets to change the definitions of standard societal pillars. so why should anybody have that right? >> are you prepared to withdraw as commencement speaker? >> absolutely. i would say that this is their day. and the last thing i would want to do is rain on their parade. >> last month, dr. carson gained attention for delivering a blistering key note address at the prayer breakfast criticizing the presid

well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they people who believe in bestiality doesn't matter what they are. they don't get to change the definition. so he, it's not something that is against gays, it's against anybody who wants to come along and change the fundamental definitions of pillars of society. it has significant ramifications. >> sean: and you know, it's interesting, justice sotomayor brought up the issue of polygamy and incest. where does the definition stop and i guess we'll be debating it for weeks and months to come. but dr. carson thank you for standing strong and i'm sorry you had to go through the treatment for speaking your mind and being an individual. >> it won't be the end of it, thanks. >> sean: welcome to my world, good to see you. coming up next, you've got to see for the first time the portions of a so-called educational video that teaches students that americans are to blame for 9/11. the latest on tha÷÷ >> and welcome back to "hannity." we're finally getting a look at the controversial, quote, educational video. the back story, a mot

comes from the same person who's compared homosexuality to murder, to prostitution, to incest, to bestialityhat he doesn't care about partisan politics? or ideology? really? >> we're not buying it, right? because, i mean, since the supreme court picked a president, maybe they don't care who the presidents are, but once you make that kind of intervention, as nia was mentioning, that's contributed to the declining popularity of this hallowed institution. ska lcalia is the last person h who can have credibility in talking about not being political. when you look back at the litany of his kind of comments as sort of conservative positions and just the way that he sort of positions his arguments and his statements has been very, very politicized and also sometimes racially charged. you know, also sometimes charged along the lines of sexism. so scalia is unfortunately not a very useful voice for us in this discussion as to whether or not scotus can become less political and more popular in the american imagination. >> on that point, ryan, given what we've heard from justice scalia, documented hist

gohmert has compared homosexuality to bestiality, endorsed a column likening barack obama's presidencyf hitler's dictatorship. and terror babies like human time bombs will be trained abroad only to return some day to wreak ask in america." and steve king suggested the president's parents could have telegrammed in a birth announcement from kenya. let's listen to this guy. >> it would have been awfully hard to fraudulently file the birth notice of barack obama being born in hawaii and get that into our public libraries in that microfish that they keep of all the newspapers published. that doesn't mean there aren't other explanations on how they might have announced that by telegram from kenya. the list fwoez on. >> these characters that are okay for your convention, al, but not an elected governor who's very popular in jersey? tell me your rules. >> well, here's what we have. we've got 30 main ballroom speakers. the folks you mentioned, frac frankly, most of them are part of a 200-plus-person panel program we have. 30 main ballroom speakers we've got. 40 republican senators, 30 governors

medical school due to students protesting what appeared to be his comparison of same-sex marriage to bestiality and pedophilia. dr. carson spoke to msnbc's andrew mitchell yesterday. >> i certainly don't have any problem with people who are gay having legal arrangements. in fact, any two adults, gay, straight, whatever. certainly they can have legal arrangements. they should be treated just as anyone else. but, being treated just as anyone else no one else gets to change the definitions of standard, you know, societal pillars. so, why should anybody have that right? >> well, "the new york times" is reporting that we may be close to a deal on immigration reform. officials tell the paper that business and labor groups are near an agreement on a guest worker program. and this is welcome news for the bipartisan senate gang of eight who said this week that talks had stalled. but now senator chuck schumer is telling the "times," quote, we are very close. closer than we've ever been. we are very optimistic but there are a few issues remaining. unquote. now the senators are hoping to introduce a bill w

. >> group, be they gays, who believe in bestiality. >> we're going to lower the goal down to six feetverybody can slam dunk the ball. >> i think it's part of culture. an interesting topic to people. >> never realized a human being could be gay until my wife and i accidentally made one. >> the opposition is in the process of crumbling. >> if they cared about gays, they would have been onboard in the beginning. >> marry 18 people, marry a duck. >> quack, quack. >> bill o'reilly has flip-flopped. the gayest of all beach sandals. >> the other side hasn't been able to do anything but thump the bible. >> how many of you who watch fox are bible thumpers? you're sort of marginalized. >> sarah palin stole the show at this weekend's cpac convention. >> he's got the rifle, i've got the rack. >> sarah palin jumped in and supported rand paul, marco rubio. >> don't let the big consulta consultants, big money men and big, bad media scare you off. >> someone cast a spell on a youtube comment, and it came to life. >>> let's get right to our panel, joining us now, dana milbank, political columnist for

well, she had bestiality, she had lesbianism. they'd seen it all before. there was nothing new that could titillate them, that could excite them, that could make them want to go back and see it again. so i think that's where we are. there's absolutely nothingew, in a perverted sense, that we can do. now, maybe we might like to try god once again. >> what church do you belong to? >> well, we go to an evangelical presbyterian church just outside of washington called fourth presbyterian, where dick halverson, the chaplin of the senate, was for many years, and a welshman by the name of robert norris speaks the king's english thway was to be spoken every sunday. >> when did you first learn about god? >> well, i had a vague familiarity as a young man, because my parents took me to church. but there was no personal relationship for many years. i think it was in the midst of this great success syndrome that many of us feel. when i started working for nbc, i wanted to be a network correspondent by the time i was 30, and like many others in this town or around the c

. >> no group, be they gays, be they nambla, be they people who believe in bestiality, it doesn't matterre, they don't get to change the definition. so it's not something that's against gays. >> my father had a ranch. we used to hire 50 to 60 wetbacks and pick tomatoes. now it takes two people to pick the same tomatoes now. it's all done by machine. >> joining me now is are two strategists. good sunday to both of you. n noelle, every time we hear that statement from young we have to nod our heads and cringe. is this merely a generation gap given the age of congressman young? >> no, it's not a generation gap. it's atrocious. what an asinine comment for somebody to make especially when the gop has felt basically a rebranding effort from the chairman to outreach to the latino and hispanic community. i'm offended by this. i actually think he should get out. if he is this out of touch, he is the worst representation that we can have involved in our party. and, like i said, when we are really trying desperately to reach out to minorities and h hispanics, for him to do this, he's in politics so

animals drug addicts smokers prostitution, heroin use incest adultery, obscenity child pornography bestiality it is just like having a roommate. >> bill: like having a roommate. >> same thing. the roommates he has? where did he go to school? >> bill: i think he's got a little homophobia. >> little problem there yeah. so him and alito are the two that will be the hardest to move. >> bill: not thomas? >> thomas if you make the federalism that the government is overreaching, federal government is overreaching, he might strike doma on that ground. >> bill: today and tomorrow. prop 8 today. doma tomorrow. the united states supreme court. i want to ask you about you've also talked about and written about this interview yesterday. "the today show" airing an interview not done by members of the today staff peter. who was it that did that? >> john veigler. >> bill: who was doing an interview with sandusky. he brought the interview to abc and they -- to nbc and they aired it on "the today show." >> we know today is in second place and they're having struggles about lauer and curie and who pushed who ou

most of the cia are from by this bestial joint operations command.jointthe operations command. they are getting combat medals for dropping bombs a remote control. .- by remote control we can fight a war against these people. bombedll clinton yugoslavia in 1999, i will give you a fact -- he was the first american president since world war ii to bomb white people. figure that out. last question. >> in investigative journalism, you run into a lot of situations. >> speak. >> can you hear me better? >> go ahead. >> in investigative journalism, you can choose to work with anonymous sources. where do you draw the line on that? for criticize myself anonymous sources. it is terrible. i love to name everyone, but they would all be put in jail. [laughter] anonymoususe the sources and where do draw the line? istake the new yorker, which an amazing place to work. the final person in fairly is a grammarian. -- in general is a grammarian. one was a last time someone talked about parallelism? you have to deal with that eventually. anyone who deals with me knows that