i am beth lewis. it is flawed. it is inadequate. the eir claims the only adverse effect is it will impair the historical significance of a very small portion of the park. i really do not think that cutting down 55 trees and paving over 7 acres near a beautiful ocean, essentially changing the character of the west end of the park, is significant. the benefits of this project to not outweigh the damage and loss this will conflict. please locate this project elsewhere. the eir does not address the fact that there are alternative places to locate the project. someone brought up earlier that the west sunset soccer fields would be an ideal location. we have heard from many soccer players. we are all for sports and children. clearly, some would prefer to play on grass and some would prefer to play on artificial turf. switching the turf and natural grass is a no-brainer. the project is inconsistent, and the eir does not address the fact that the project is inconsistent with the 1998 golden gate park master plan, the national registry listin