i also teach and work with young women in a scene that we once again have white betty for dan famously called a problem with no name, meaning millions of young women, the girl power generation have been told they can do or be anything, yet they also note their most important task is to be slen, hot and nonthreatening to men, that there is a walk of shame on college campuses for girls, but not for boys. and once they get out in the workforce, they learned there is still pay discrimination, and flexible work basis, women more than men slotted into low-paid dead-end job in the glass ceiling in so many lines of work. they also get the message loud and clear that the absolute last thing they should embrace it feminism. they have been intimidated actually to shun feminism when i think in their hearts they know we still need it here at info, we have a need and a desire that is being censored. so what i wanted to do was ten-point what it is that remains unspoken, but that is still bothering so many of us into given name to what's coursing through our popular culture. this message, that you can

at the very same time you have people like betty for dan, literally within that same year you have people like thomas q. and who are starting to talk about science in terms of revolution. he is starting to question the admissions of that very masculine scientist and all of these things are happening at the very same time. this is when rachel carson is writing silent spring. this is not science as usual, because first of all it is not an ethical posture and she doesn't apologize for it. she answer from our prices what she is writing about in the period of masculine science but she is starting to do this. all of a sudden people are starting to question not the issues of that scientist who is always presumably male but now they are saying you know this guy probably has a subjectivity is ringing to his science. is probably asking certain questions because he has got that subjectivity. so people are starting to question this. it is funny i have to say, back in the 1950s there was a fascinating study done by margaret mead. sheehan as other woman when a grant to all of these high school students