bhattacharya about how dr.about how he's for commission to he's calling for a commission to examine whether lockdown and other covid were right other covid policies were right for usa . should the uk covid for the usa. should the uk covid inquiry asks questions. inquiry asks similar questions. now time for a check on the now it's time for a check on the news headlines with . alison 332 news headlines with. alison 332 here's the latest from the gb newsroom. rishi sunak says he's it everything to achieve a new deal over the northern ireland protocol but insists it's not done yet. speaking to the sunday times , the prime minister said times, the prime minister said he's hopeful of a positive outcome with the european union describing it as unfinished business. he said it's vital to ensure a return to power sharing the province. dpi has refused to form an executive at stormont in over the current brexit deal. mp sammy wilson says the party hasn't seen any proposal yet. what we do is that there doesn't appear to hav

bhattacharya, just an honor to have you on the show this morning.educated. how did it make you feel to be fact checked and censored by a bunch of pajama boys at twitter? [laughter] >> i mean, it was shocking, actually, rachel. because the american people deserve to understand that there was a very wide range of opinions about how best to manage the pandemic. there was not a consensus. you heard dr. fauci saying i am the science, that was ridiculous. rachel: yeah. >> a very large number of doctors thought and epidemiologists thought that was not the right way to manage the pandemic. and what twitter 1.0 did was essentially deny the american people of that fact. it was a absolutely shocking breach of their responsibility to allow the debate to happen. rachel: yeah. i proudly signed very early on the declaration. it just made common sense. but it seemed like common sense wasn't in great supply in the middle of this covid pandemic, and voices like yours were being censored. i'm really impressed with the congresswoman and her admission that she had a vac

jay bhattacharya, professor of medicine at stanford.the end, this could end up being one of the most consequential meetings of our speed 26 response and, of course, the public knew nothing about this. your reaction tonight? >> you basically had a small cabal of government affiliated scientists making a decision about a scientific point and they got the science wrong. they basically said that if you had covid, that didn't matter because you only had short lasting protection. i don't know what they were thinking. the reason it matters laura is at the time they were vaccine mandates that the biden administration had recommended and put in place via executive order all across the country. a lot of people including a lot of nurses who had covid didn't want to vaccine. they lost their jobs because a small cabal of government affiliated scientists got the science wrong. and they did it not transparently where they could have had the open meeting, could have had a lot of people outside telling them what the science was actually saying. >> laura

what were they thinking that they were doing when they blocked people like dr bhattacharya, for instancee twitters twitter lawyers were wholly unqualified to be censoring information or flag. being actual data medical data from qualified doctors that are educated at harvard and stanford, some of the we're trying to share cdc data and some of the warnings for folks that had natural immunity that they didn't need to be vaccinated. you know? how do you trust the science when the government is literally trying to censor science? we were really told that dr fauci was science and that anything else that fell outside of his purview was not. and now we see that dr j. about achara, among others from stanford university. who who really talked early on about the destructive impact of lockdowns on children and their mental health, which we see is clearly a very bad side effect. never got a chance to really be weighed in public opinion. >> martha: right. it had a devastating impact on a single mom of two. i saw how hard with us for kids that couldn't go to school and purposely silencing those voices.

jay bhattacharya, professor of drt stanford. dr. like in the end, this could end up being one oft the most consequential meeting s of our covid response. and , of course, the public knew nothing about this. >> your reaction tonight, you had basically a small cabal of government affiliated scientists making a decision about a scientificsca decisi po and they got the science wrong. they basically said that if you'd had covered ort covered well, that didn't didn't matter. itdi matter you only had short g protection. i don't know what they weredon'e thinking. he tim the reason it matters, laura , is because at the time there were vaccine mandates thatbiden the biden administration had had recommended and put in place via executive order all across the country. a lontry.t of people, includingo a lot of nursevis who had covered or covered , didn't . nt the vaccine they lost their jobs because a small cabal of government scin affiliated scientists gottiscie the science wrong. trand they did it not transparent, like they could have had an o

people don't know the great barrington declaration, it was a document drawn up by people like jay bhattacharyald, immunology and field, medically immunology and the emails are there with from the emails are there with from the saying we need to the fda saying we need to discredit them as fringe activities. well she was leading the at discrediting these absolutely criminal and that needs to be an inquiry that maybe i'll let right moving on otherwise i won't sleep at night i don't think for the next few decades charlie you can me get in touch with your mp mates. tell them to come and have a chat. we may also see out rights gentlemen, slight change of gean gentlemen, slight change of gear, think is gear, but i think this is a really interesting for really interesting story. for years talking about years we've been talking about whether be a male whether would ever be a male contraceptive okay? contraceptive pill, okay? and would have intimate would women have intimate relations with a man would relations with a man who would say, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, i've taken that male pill. yeah, i'm all sett