this is what bias is and implicit bias and there ar aredifferent categories. it doesn't say if you engage this will happen. it just defines it. >> if behavior is unconscious we cannot punish for it. we would get sued to next year. if someone does not know they are doing something until we put them on notice we can't punish them for it. >> we are not arguing that. >> wait, wait. the issue is if it recurs, yes, meaning more than once, there has to be a fact inquiry. not every situation is the same. by putting will you are putting one box into everything. i just don't think that is right or that is fair. unconscious behavior. you have to have the flexibility to ask what is the exact situation going on here? it has to be may in my opinion. >> are we using unconscious and implicit bias the same thing according to the d.g.o.? >> it is. >> i don't have a problem making it mandatory. just for the sense that because as commissioner hirsch just delineated if there is recurring issues, how many times do we need to see bias in policing out of one officer before we are wil

>> implicit bias footnote. i just want to know how many commissioners are prepared to adopt it the way it is written? >> i feel like it is confusing and unclear. >> i don't see how it is to clarify it. if you had proposed language. >> it is difficult because implicit bias and explicit bias are fact specific and it is hard to define or qualify. we are trying to do that, which i get, but the way i read it, it just doesn't sort of -- it is unclear in terms of what the officers' punishment will be if this happens multiple times. the officers deserve clarity with you engage in this conduct, this is what happy ne -- what h. >> if it is knowingly engaging in bias it kicks up and you are terminated. >> we can't have a discipline for unconscious behavior. what this says if it is a pattern it becomes known, then the discipline is discipline then you are in the knowingly category. >> give me an opportunity. i have to tell you now we have to be specific on discipline and i don't know if the public knows this. when we bring

>> implicit bias footnote. i just want to know how many commissioners are prepared to adopt it the way it is written? >> i feel like it is confusing and unclear. >> i don't see how it is to clarify it. if you had proposed language. >> it is difficult because implicit bias and explicit bias are fact specific and it is hard to define or qualify. we are trying to do that, which i get, but the way i read it, it just doesn't sort of -- it is unclear in terms of what the officers' punishment will be if this happens multiple times. the

and that people can't find the bias. this is a very important point. this is probably where there's people who will disagree in the fayette sublimina subliminal. i want to get into this because it's an important point. don't forget to check out levintv most weeknights. you can go to place tb.com/mark and sign up there. don't forget 14 weeks on the new york best sellers list. those of you who haven't gotten it, i encourage you to get it. we'll be right back. fact is, every insurance company hopes you drive safely. but allstate helps you. with drivewise. feedback that helps you drive safer. and that can lower your cost now that you know the truth... are you in good hands? your business is up and running, but is it going beyond fast? comcast business gives you high speed internet. we also have solutions like powerful wifi that gives your entire business more coverage and automatic internet backup that can keep your business running. and it all starts with our gig-speed network. so give us 10 minutes. if we can't offer you f

bias. i sympathize with that. i don't like the fact that the bias is getting expressed in a way that is interfering with the free and fair election but typically 95% or more of donations from google go to democrats. the former head of google, eric offered in writing to run the clintons campaign in 2016. hillary clinton chief technology officer, stephanie right before she came to the race team, she was an executive at google and google and alphabet the parent company, they were the largest donors in 2016. >> let me say for the record, the ceo of google wants to come on and have a discussion with me. >> more than welcome, i would encourage it. let's continue. 2018, democrats pick up a whole bunch of seats. did you monitor that? >> this time we had moreer than 160 field agents. we focused, because midterm elections on three republican districts in orange county, california, thinking perhaps maybe if there's something going on with search results, maybebee would pick it up in those counties. in

and that people can't find the bias. this is a very important point. this is probably where there's people who will disagree in the fayette sublimina subliminal. i want to get into this because it's an important point. don't forget to check out levintv most weeknights. you can go to place tb.com/mark and sign up there. don't forget 14 weeks on the new york best sellers list. those of you who haven't gotten it, i encourage you to get it. we'll be right back. fact is, every insurance company hopes you drive safely. but allstate actually helps you drive safely... with drivewise. it lets you know when you go too fast... ...and brake too hard. with feedback to help you drive safer. giving you the power to actually lower your cost. unfortunately, it can't do anything about that. now that you know the truth... are you in good hands? tell him we're flexible. don't worry. my dutch is ok. just ok? (in dutch) tell him we need this merger. (in dutch) it's happening..! just ok is not ok. especially when it comes to your network. at&t

it begins with media bias. media device is a distortion of the story, the twisting of the story to bend to the political worldview of the author. you can a two tens of bias in that direction. you can have the bias by omission where you move things come as a title, the people he interview. it's the spectacle, the labeling you put, the conclusion to reach, the headlines, all different ways. then there's bias by omission which is his opposite. it is the refusal to write a story, to do a story, to label people, to give the other side of the story, to put a complete headline to give the proper conclusion. those are all bias by omission. that's the first level. the second level is false news. false news is a story that somebody reports unwitting -- not unwittingly but unknowingly. this is often times a reflection of poor journalism. once upon a time, journalism 101 was to make independent sources or you don't have a news story. that people are just brushing to come out with anything began to be the first kids on the

i'm here tonight to present the second quarter, 2019 bias audit , conducted in regards to potential bias that might be discovered through electronic communications. the audits are limited to devices the department owns and not any member's personal devices. the audits capture electronic messages that are transmitted from personal devices to department devices. all members are aware that the department's electronic munication devices are audited and that they do not have an expectation of privacy. the following policies set this forth. the department general order 10.08 which is use of computers and peripheral equipment, department bulletin 19-051, which is titled as fpd's members expectation of privacy, use of computers peripheral facilities, and finally there is an internal affairs bureau quarter that speaks to the audit process. there are three systems that are audited. the three systems are as follows. the california law enforcement telecommunications system, which is commonly referred to as plots, department e-mail system, and finally text messaging via department issued cellular pho

strongly worded complaints like those that bbc news has a bias against brexit, significantly has a biasrexit, significa ntly outnumber objections ofa significa ntly outnumber objections of a prejudice in favour of brexit. though there have been plenty of the letter also in the last few days have seen the arrival of a new television programme and this contentious area, hoping to shed some light on the twists and turns of the process. brexit cast which has been running as a podcast for more than two years has now taken over the thursday late night slot previously occupied by andrew neil's this week on bbc one. at the start of the first show one of its four presenters outlined what new audiences should expect. for people sitting in a box with headphones on. and it's not the usual thing of telly and suits and auto cues and all that kind of stuff. that is obvious. it is not our usual persona oi'i obvious. it is not our usual persona on television either because if you see us on television either because if you see us on on television either because if you see us on the ten o'clock news or if

some people bring up bias, opioids, short-term vacation rentals even. there is a bill in congress this month that suggests there should be a carveout to make sure short-term vacation rental platforms like airbnb or vrbo can't tether their liability protections to get around state and local protections. what is your take? there are people saying these carveouts should not be something congress is doing. there was one last year for fighting sex trafficking. what is your take on that? rep. mcnerney: like a log of these issues, it is complex and there is a lot of nuance and there are different sides that need to be taken into consideration. 230 has been incredibly important for the development of pack. -- of tech. if we move forward, we need to move forward cautiously. what i would like to see is an open conversation, hearings, summits with experts, and get a good idea of what would work and what wouldn't work. i am very cautious about moving forward with carveouts that might have unintended consequences. so yeah, let's talk about this, be open about it, ha

conditions sort of bias doesn't only so there's bias which comes in later as we begin to create programs that sort of the function of pattern recognition and so forth this is where we have biases but we already have biases implicit in the data ok so a threat to democracy. and palmer i'd like to hear your response to that an extension of an existing democratic system which is unjust and systematically racist that's what we would be creating but the answer is to is to bring it out there to democratize it was one of the many answers one of the many questions in terms of the ai software itself we need to make that more sensible to everybody so that it's not in the hands of just a few people i believe that there's a even more fundamental problem which is that human beings ourselves of a similar to a i i don't i think it's a threat to democracy the way we think because garbage in garbage out is what we say about ai and human beings are no different and therefore one should question liberal democracy itself and look for alternatives and which is something we absolutely don't do so coming from i

the data can be bias depending on how you use it. algorithms, i think, are little bit more, a little bit bit more nuance in there. how do we fit standards or is there some sort of a testing procedure? these are important issues that i get excited just thinking about developing standards for algorithms. we certainly are not there yet. >> what do you think president trump means? seen in the last year in different ways where president trump and others will very loudly talk about google and facebook twitter. different bias ideological decision making choices with these companies. what does that represent in terms of this broader debate? i'm sure it's a little different. how do you see the president's role here? >> everybody loves that these days. i think it's political opportunism, in my opinion. it is effective political opportunity for him. i think the president's role should be limited and the more he weighs into this, the less effective he will come. algorithm development. less is more. >> congressmen jerry mcnerney. a member of the

how has that been coming up in the last year when it comes to bias?ou brought this up in congressional hearings. how much is that of an issue in congressional policy, and are there actions that should be taken to address that? it is one of those complicated issues you mentioned. rep. mcnerney: one of the best protections for algorithm bias is having a diverse workforce. that is something we have to work on. if you look at silicon valley, it is not the kind of diversity we need. i think that is an important first step. algorithms are a little different than data. the data can be biased if you take it from a certain region or demographic group. the data can be biased depending on how you use it. little bitare a set nuanced in how we standards, or is there some sort of testing seizure? -- testing procedure? i get excited thinking about how to develop standards for algorithms, but we are not there yet. josh: what do you think president trump means when he tweets about the bias of these tech companies? president trump and others will very loudly talk about

it is significant because it reveals specific bias heavily influences officers when making stops. this information is invaluable, because it allows for improvement in policy that helps mediate the influence of bias. now we are going to have marcus talk about better practices. >> throughout our internship we engaged in weekly discussions of the afro mentioned. i've come up with four techniques that we have deemed to be best practices. we would like to preface this by saying we recognize that implicit bias is not a simple issue to fix we do not believe that these best practices will solve the issue but rather could decrease its effects. to begin, we would like to adjust our awareness. spreading information on implicit bias by law enforcement , we believe this information will help officers become more aware of the decisions on black and brown communities. second we would like to suggest transparency through the utilization of 96a. it showcases patterns that may be existing in order to ensure disproportionate, discriminatory stops not taking place. third, we would like to suggest com

some people bring up bias, opioids, short-term vacation rentals even. there's the bill in congress this month the suggests that should be a carveout to make sure short-term vacation rental platforms like airbnb can't .2 other reliability protections to get around state and local protection. are you concerned about that in any way? there's been people think these carveouts are not something congress should be doing. there was an initial one for fighting sex trafficking. what's your take on that? >> guest: like a lot of these issues, it's complex and there's lots of nuance and there are different sides that due to be taken into consideration. section 230 has been incredibly important for the development of tech, and so i think if we move forward we need to move forward cautiously. what i would like to see israel open conversation, a couple of hearings, some summits with experts, and get a good idea of what would work and what would not work. i'm very cautious about moving forward with carveouts that might have unintended consequences. yeah, let's talk abo

there are accusations of perceived bias coming against the bbc.e of them come from people who feel the bbc is anti—brexit and i wonder how you are dealing with that. every broadcastjournalist comes with their own baggage but it is absolutely fundamental to the british broadcasting tradition and it is written down in laws and regulations that due impartiality is essential and none of us want to do the job if that wasn't the kind of guiding principle. sure, we are always challenging ourselves about all hearing the right range of voices, i'll be going to the right places to hear those voices, i'll be falling into unconscious bias? but all of us are driven by that motivation to put the story first, to find the best voices to illustrate it and understand it and crucially, that word understand. trying to get under the skin of what is going on so we can explain it. people are simultaneously bored and motivated by the whole brexit question, so fascinated and bored at the same time and the same person can hold both thoughts. the sense there is a huge at st

and this is counted as left leaning bias. the headline on this piece, i forget exactly what it is but it is, like, facebook is suppressing conservative viewpoints. >> pretty stupid, that reporter is stupid. >> what the gawker lawsuit over it john koch writes that headline and has admitted, it admitted, he says i knew the drudge report would pick this up, and that we would you monster traffic because of it. and indeed, the drudge report picked up five minutes after a came out, and they did monster traffic on it. this has set the tone for the entire discussion, it is a little piece of clickbait that was put in any type of desperation, for a news outlet, that was about to get shuttered. like kara says, there is no evidence. it is nonsensical, base bringing up the fairness doctrine, it is just this weird thing, where speaking of marketplace for ideas, what they want is affirmative action for conservative viewpoints on social media platforms. you don't get a quota system for your ideas! that is not how it works. that is not how re

whether there is bias, what the a worthy of bias is discussion. when you are looking in just the hearts and minds of officers, see it.n do not i am not saying that because there are disparities out there officers holdthat in their heart defective character. in fact, it is frequently not situations that produce despairate outcomes. we need to define what those situations are and keep officers it.of rice was noted by the chairman earlier. very close to re an individual who might have had a weapon but that is, in the of my chiefs i deal with, ften a situation that can be avoided. the way you avoid that, you don't put your car up next to someone you think is armed. maintain a safe distance. now, the officers don't need to be bigoted in their hearts to in something that was detrimental, a pattern of towards al findings black communities. so if we define that narrowly as the only problem, again, we elevate to solving it. so the question of the science, none of that was right. of how do we n move forward, we should define the problem more precisely so de

will it be or can we put standards that prevent the bias problems that might occur with ai? will be allowed ai to bias financial records or healthcare records in weight that might be harmful to people? we need to establish standards for that. will it be an important part of our national security international defense? what about the employment issue? will be be able to use ai to create jobs and you think ai will eliminate -- but that will not happen. most any job that someone has has several [inaudible]'s with a tapestry. you want to find the complements that will work with ai and replace the ai and put those together in a way that makes people more productive and does not eliminate jobs. >> host: how have we used ai already today in our day-to-day basis? where do you see ai going in the next five-ten years? >> guest: i think healthcare is the most obvious. you can have ai trained to look at the x-rays and radiography and it's more accurate than radiologists so i think that's an important application. also, i see you're getting closer and closer to self driving cars and that

that is huge bias. here's what i would like to say. is joe biden going to release his conversations. i would like to demand that joe biden now release all of his conversations that he had when he was vice president with ukraine. especially now in light of what we learned about joe biden, bragging on tape about how he leveraged 1 billion u.s. dollars. why would a vice president of the united states ever want a prosecutor in ukraine fired? the guy that was investigating his own son and he was tipped off by "the new york times" that his own son was being investigated. there is a lot more to this story -- >> ed: you are right. there are a lot of people raising questions about the president. you played the clip. he posted about getting that prosecutor fired at a time when the obama administration, not the trump administration, was holding aid and loans over the head of the ukrainian government at that time, sean. >> sean: yet. $1 billion. you are not getting the money. same prosecutor investigating holdings. that's the same company that his

ofhave built a lot technology to identify if there is bias. there is good bias and bad bias.built something which treats cancer patients. i was told, you have only trained it with three institutions. we are like, they are the three best in the world, is that a bad idea? we are talking about serious decisions. this idea of who trains things, otherwise you will get -- there have been many examples of this out in the world. it has been completely oblivious to whether it is gender or whatever it is. it has made the wrong decisions, so you do need a diverse workforce. caroline: i think that is fascinating that you are talking about trust, ethics, bias. things plaguing technology in the u.s. and worldwide at the moment. do you feel that corporate leadership in the u.s. is taking this on board? some of the jarring that technology brings. ginni: i think this is a very key point. business needs to. if society cannot trust these technologies are us, you can't operate. i have always felt the reason ibm is 108 years old is that society has given us the license to operate. you can only do

centers did lose their funding and scholars told me there was a suspicion that politics and their bias against israel had something to do with it during the obama administration it was less about politics scholars told me and more about there was just less funding to go around and so some of these middle east studies that are so lost their funding but there have also been more recent criticisms right so actually a top department of education official wrote an opinion piece 5 years ago arguing that middle east studies centers should lose should be scrutinized more potentially because of their view their lack of viewpoint diversity and should potentially lose federal funding for their bias against israel and so that person was not in the department at the time now he is people suggest that there is a connection that clearly someone came into the department with an agenda to take on these centers and to strip them of their federal funding and some people say this is an example this threat to strip federal funding from the u.s. you do center is an example of that jay i want to go to you bu

inspector general bias,f some political that means that guy hates trump. distraction --e description of the peter strzok text messages. if you think he is a fan of the president then perhaps you cannot make the conclusion. we have seen this before. like thet does not president and files a complaint and he was on -- not on the telephone call. white house does something that never had been done before. we read the transcript and nothing is there. the democrats say that we will impeach, because i do not think they care about the truth, because if they did, nancy pelosi would not have done the press conference and said that we were going to impeach. they would have waited for some evidence. not got the evidence it was there. our prediction was exactly it. they will do this regardless of truth and fact. jake: asking for help digging up dirt on a domestic political rival, is that right or wrong? rep. roy: when i looked through this i looked through the lens, and let me first say, i am glad that this is occurring in the district i represent. the district line is

inspector general bias,f some political that means that guy hates trump. distraction --e description of the peter strzok text messages. if you think he is a fan of the president then perhaps you cannot make the conclusion. we have seen this before. like thet does not president and files a complaint and he was on -- not on the telephone call. white house does something that never had been done before. we read the transcript and nothing is there. the democrats say that we will impeach, because i do not think they care about the truth, because if they did, nancy pelosi would not have done the press conference and said that we were going to impeach. they would have waited for some evidence. not got the evidence it was there. our prediction was exactly it. they will do this regardless of truth and fact. jake: asking for help digging up dirt on a domestic political rival, is that right or wrong? rep. roy: when i looked through this i looked through the lens, and let me first say, i am glad that this is occurring in the district i represent. the district line is

some of them show evidence of bias. them just show evidence of disparity, just meaning that they're different but it's not clear why, right? but there's nothing that shows that white people are more likely to get shot and killed by law enforcement. that's not a real thing, right? so what the science is really clear on, we see that there are differences in the outcomes from law enforcement. some of that is the result of poverty. some of that is the result of crime. and some of that is a result of what police do. what we do at the center for policing equity, what we do in minneapolis is we try and help law enforcement figure out the portion of the problem that's theirs so that they can do something about it. and when i heard somebody saying that law enforcement has nothing to do and nothing to change, i was shocked in part because what i hear from chiefs all the time is that the only thing worse than lying about them and saying that they're deeply racist is lying about them and saying there's no bias in their profession b

there's going to be bias in age, in sex, in race, there's inherent bias in everything. so that given you can still have other conversations. >> my feeling is that rather than labeling -- rather than saying we'll have a nutrition label like thing that says what this algorithm is doing, i think the better strategy is to say, let's give some third party the ability to be the brand that finally decides what you see. just like with different newspapers. you can decide to see your news through "the wall street journal" or through "the new york times" or whatever else. >> who is ultimately liable if somebody gets hurt by this data? >> that's a good question. it will help to break apart the underlying platform, something like facebook, for example. you kind of have to use it. there's a network effect. and it's not the case that you can't say, let's break facebook into a thousand different facebooks. and you can pick which one you want to use. that's not really an option. what you want to do is say when there's a news feed that's being delivered, is everybody seeing a news feed

he was unreliable and the system had notice about his bias.hey obtained a warrant on 4 different occasions and will be held to account for that. mr. durham will decide who to prosecutor. my goal is to explain how the system failed and make sure it never happens again. i will make sure that rosenstein and mccabe are called before the committee to explain what happened regarding conversations about wiretapping president trump after the election. to me that's a chilly moment in american history to have a conversation between the acting attorney general, the acting fbi chief, about wiretapping the president of the united states. >> sean: that was beyond shocking to me. thank goodness for judicial watch. >> amen. >> sean: they are doing a great job. i can't mention everybody. someone would get mad at me. i appreciate the fact you will ask whether there was a rigged investigation into hillary clinton's emails. you will find out if the counter-intelligence investigation started in the white house of barack obama. what did he know? you will find that

he started meeting with mike lee who questioned the ceo about facebook's bias and antitrust concerns. then he had face time with one of the loudest facebook skeptics, senator josh holly that called for a third party audit to say that they're not biassed against conservatives. holly caught zuckerberg off caught with his questions. >> the way he can show is he's doing better is to sell instagram and what's app. he's taken off guard and he felt that was not a great idea. >> last night zuckerberg met for hours with mark winner and richard blumenthal who wants football to be broken up because he thinks big tech is too big. when zuckerberg was asked if a breakup would be a bad idea, blumenthal says he has a long way to go before he changes his mind. >> even though we may differ, i

facebook's goal is to shift questions about the company's bias and what qualifies as inappropriate content or fake news away from its executives and over towards its new board >> julia, thank you very much. we'll be back for more on that later. >>> fedex reporting q1 earnings missing on the top and bottom lines, cutting its forecast and quoting a weak environment trip, we've also got don joining us who's disconnected.

you can't have a bias, you're reporting the facts. so have you guys ever had to report on a story that you've maybe disagreed with or you know, how do you kind of keep that when you're reporting on something? >> well, i was just in alabama for abortion coverage and he think it's just understanding, like for me, it's that like you don't really know the whole story. you don't know people-- how people grow up. what they believe in and why. and so, yes, it could have a bias like you have to remind yourself like people are there for a reason and it's a lot more complicated than that, so, you know, interviewing these 18-year-olds who are protesting outside of an abortion clinic in montgomery, i think, and i was asking them like why they were there and what they believed in and they just-- it was very hard to hear that they like, you know, what their belief is very like conservative and that they believe like, you know, a man-- they were there because a man told them to be there and if the guy they would stay with him. and as a woman and to

quote, although the the preliminary review identified some indicia of an arguable political bias, itot change my determination that the complaint appears credible. grasping at straws or is there more there? >> it could be he favored john mccain who is a political rifle of the president. it's not clear it's a democratic political rival. more to the point, the reason that you challenge a person's bias is to assess their credibili credibility. this whistle-blower's credibility has been proven completely true given that he predicted for us the entire content of the call with president zelensky as well as the memorandum of the conversation had been moved to a code word server. the allegations of bias is immaterial given how much collaboration there's been. >> thank you all very much. >> can i add one thing? >> the attorney general of the united states has been globe trotting. >> that's next. >> the president of the united states made a phone call to the australian prime minister to seek help for the attorney general of the yieunited states. >> we have the reporter who broke that next. we'

did the whistleblower have political bias favoring the president's rival? bombshell claims. the impeachment chaos overshadowing donald trump on the world stage as he puts america first. >> the future does not belong to globalists. the future belongs to patriots. heather: the warning shot defied at iran and china. the legacy of 9/11 heroes, the graduates making all-americans proud. "fox and friends first" starts now. good morning to you. you are watching "fox and friends first" on wednesday morning. thank you very much for joining us. let's start with a fox news alert, it is shaping up to be a busy day, trump administration official says there is evidence of political bias in whistleblower complaint against the president. the exclusive report coming as we await the release of the transcript. garrett tenney joins us from washington where congress just launched an impeachment inquiry. >> reporter: the white house is expected to release several key documents including the fully unredacted transcript of the july phone call with ukraine's president. and administration official tel

more media bias. senator charles schumer said senate democrats will block president trump's use of pentagon funds to pay for the wall even though the supreme court cases back him up. just days before the anniversary of 9/11, obama's homeland security secretary janet napolitano said the border is not a top threat. we have overwhelming evidence that says otherwise. and what janet napolitano is the top threat? you will be surprised. maybe you won't be. [♪] we have a jam-packed hour ahead. we are going right to edward lawrence live at the white house with the latest on the president removing his third national security advisor in as many years. reporter: a lot going on here. that seems to be the norm at the white house. what we know is former national security advisor is not here at the white house. the president says that he fired john bolton last night. john bolton says the two had a conversation last night. but the president left it let's talk about it tomorrow. the president then bolton then sending h

a scoring boots on again i remember during the transfer window levon dusky openly complained about bias transfer policy and demanded new top class players now his wishes were granted in the form of philip because she and their relationship finally blossomed last weekend against cologne this week against bottom side palla born could be that time to shine again. robert leaven dusty warmed up for this clash with 9 goals in the bank after just 5 match days 3 more than the entire part of born scored it was almost a surprise then that the pole wasn't on the end of felipe could see neo's cross in the 15 minutes surged in every with his 1st goal of the season. could seno was signed by the blind bosses to posses just like this one his teammates a reaping the benefits already. the roles were reversed on 55 minutes an average up the brazilian to tap home from close range yahshua kimmitt sure the pass continuo would be proud of in the build up the brazilian magic is clearly rubbing off on his teammates. 68 maybe they couldn't could they. not on a robot 11 dog skis watch who else but the big pole to

i think they will trade with a heavy bias. the ftse 100 they will trade with a heavy bias.e100 is up some 9% for the year which is about half the move up in developed market stocks this year. private sector investment, business investment in business it, thatis business investment in business it, that is declining and so the layers of uncertainty has just been elevated and on top of that you have the toxicity in parliament today because of the verdict of the supreme court yesterday about the prorogation of parliament being unlawful. the us and japan have outlined initial details of a new deal. there is still more work to do is they ironed out a broader agreement. some of the key issues: washington is keen to reduce its more than $67 billion trade deficit with japan, with a large part of that imbalance to do with cars. that is why president trump has been threatening to impose tariffs of up to 25% onjapanese cars but tokyo seems to have managed to avoid this. agricultural products have been another sticking point but sitting alongside the japanese prime minister, mr trump ha

is a part of the human experience and racism is just one of the ways that people express bias when i moved her across my dad and i was like that i don't think i can stay because people keep on staring at me and he said assume they're looking because they like what they see and so. it has to conduct always laughing so i want to find out what exactly was thinking about. why don't you think she is good to look at of course are you disagreeing with what she's saying that people don't necessarily look out of curiosity but rather because of a bias as she was explaining in my experience i've been here for almost 20 years now. to be kind of have not experienced racism. it's all depends on our mindset what you focus on your truck and to yourself so i see the human being black white wrote to me i see the person as you are on the way you are right the way you do when you approach all of us that's how you're going to be received don't you think that's a little bit naive though because i mean i could carry myself as a queen but if people see me as trash you should be what you should have self-con

the noble even all noble title of whistleblower sally my deed by partisan politics in the accuracy bias over the intelligence community inspector general's preliminary review identified some indicia of an arguable political bias on the part of the complete in favor of a rival political candidate such evidence does not change my determination that the complaint relating to the urgent concern appears credible whistleblowers now essentially a 5050 anonymous source you get on c.n.n. for example fun to listen to but as practice shows it's taken with a dose of salt source tells n.b.c. news law enforcement and democratic sources telling c.n.n. that in a fired sources anonymous sources according to anonymous washington post source you're basing all these allegations off of one or maybe 2 sources which c.n.n. is this is not receiving any reports it's washington post new york times wall street journal c.n.n. a.b.c. elihu resources all because they're hiding behind this and they can not. do you don't tell me that you're just going to attack sources these whistleblower a poor it was but now for the

he told us he only worked in the technical department of bias intelligence but he never fought never murdered or tortured anyone nor ordered anyone to he insisted he was merely a peripheral figure despite having had a slave why did you buy a slave how. i was exonerated probably shouldn't be talking without my lawyer. but i haven't done anything bad. she was in very poor health and we helped her but i never talked to her. about it why did you buy a human being with 2 children. thing is. she was doing really badly. and in islam you're rewarded for treating a slave well because later of rights. and going to understand he said it's come to question. is this woman was really ill but as i said we helped her where we could. and i had no other intentions i already had a big family of course if we wanted to make money by her cheap to fatten her up so . look if you want to provoke me no that's not true no no i don't need that money just. bought her an order to trade her. we had money problems all the time oh so martin bought her to make money. in the egg only to make some money he said that in

the prices the merino will depend mostly on the daily demand on average the bias paid the equivalent of 15 euros per kilo. in free will costs about one year i pick . the irish fish the. new strategy and wool growers association set a target date of 2010 for ending the practice. but that hasn't happened yet we're here to talk to walter merry men who was the association chairman until last year we wanted to find out what he thinks of the increasing demand from using free will due to concerns about animal welfare. brains and what i mean i can go. surely there's a huge parallel industry doesn't want. you mean by the industry the bias from germany for example like they don't find out now any specific in germany they want to a meal because they start to say there isn't any. to 2 failures in 100 change akira finish what growers look at and until the time when the. best way for them to look after a shape is where the show is you go chelation with thyroid. but that procedure is still an exception among sheep farmers merryman says that mules in free will is available if clients are willing to.