then, on page 4h3, where it mentions sue bierman park, i think it would be worthwhile to mention that bought two or three, which is the one next to one maritime plaza, has been discussed as being able to accommodate four tennis courts or three tennis courts and one basketball court, which potentially could be funded by the eight washington, having inadequate recreation in the area. on pages 4h 10-12, the eir concludes that the project would not create the need for physically altered parking, would not have a significant effect on all opportunities. i concur with the. then, on page six, 24, and 30, where we talk about the alternative, which is to develop only eight washington, and the alternative at the environmentally superior alternative, it does not include the fact that those alternatives would have aesthetic impact compared with the proposed project of a more abrupt step down from the golden gate with center tower to the embarcadero, and it would not contribute to the visual interest and improve the pedestrian experience along the embarcadero. i think that should be included in th