well, kurshchyna, and as of this morning, possibly bilhorodshchyna as well, but we are monitoring therel caution. actually, with caution we also monitor the kursk region. why? because of some official information. and we don’t have specific data that would be subject to analysis, but to trust russian z publics is to disrespect oneself, in principle, on the other hand, it is uneasy, and several, already several actually populated areas of the russian federation are under the control of the armed forces of ukraine, we saw this video, we saw that absolutely specific brigades are called, nevertheless, here... now we are in a situation where for the first time since the middle of the 20th century the russian federation received military action directly on its territory. and all this is happening 16 years after she did just shameful things in georgia in 2008. and in your opinion, in the historical perspective, what are we seeing now and what will it lead to? you know what is the most amazing thing? khrystyna, that from the point of view of the russian federation, military actions on its terri

says that she is collecting some help there with her project for the residents of kurshchyna, bilhorodshchynand so forth who suffered from the actions of the armed forces of ukraine, that is, it qualifies the problem now as arising from actions armed forces of ukraine, and this, i'm sorry, well, i 'm not saying that she's a standard of some kind of intellectual thought, but it would seem like a person who claims to be, well, the title of a journalist, at least, yes, listen, what a journalist, ksenia sabchak, part of the system, and it makes what is considered generally acceptable in this system, somehow money for peaceful residents of ukraine who have become victims, victims of behavior.

says that she is collecting some help there with her project for the residents of kurshchyna, bilhorodshchynand so forth who suffered from the actions of the armed forces of ukraine. that is, she now qualifies the problem as arising from the actions of the armed forces of ukraine, and this, i’m sorry, well, i’m not saying that she is a standard of some kind of intellectual thought, but... it would seem like a person who claims to well, the title of journalist, at least what kind of journalist, ksenia sabchak is part of the system, and she does what is considered in this system generally speaking, somehow money for peaceful residents of ukraine who became victims, victims of the behavior of the armed forces of the russian federation, she did not collect, neither for the residents of kharkiv, nor for the residents of odesa, and these are russian cities, why don't you give money to the residents... and those who were maimed, and those who were raped, and those who were deprived of property, and those who live without light, and those who can live in the cold, she did not collect any money for an

we accordingly preempted and made this buffer vision on the territory of kurshchyna, it may be bilhorodshchynanshchyna, other regions, but why not do it? this is what predisposes to, for example, today on our cities and villages from a close distance, now the enemy must place his firepower 50-100 km away and aviation capabilities not 80-100 km away, but 200 and beyond, it is clear that in this situation we have a strategic perspective withdrawal of the enemy's reserves, not the ones that we are talking about all of pokrovsk, there putin gave instructions not to change anything, that is, on the contrary, to build up so that there were possible offensive opportunities, but the reserves coming from russia are now being thrown to the kurshchyna, part of them were removed from the kharkiv direction , from kherson, accordingly, zaporizhzhia, well, i understand, troops were moved to skaliny oblast, so at the moment... another strategic goal is to weaken the enemy, especially his reserves, to reorient in another direction and , of course, to destroy in this direction, but already forming fortified are

means that we understood from this publication that in addition to kurshchyna, there will also be bilhorodshchynahey are now talking about the possibility. up to 10 km zone in hostilities, and this is already on the other side of the border, well of course, it is quite possible, but the effect of opportunity, the effect of surprise opens a window of opportunity for two or three weeks, no more, then it closes, because, well, they already cease to be a surprise by surprise, so we can expect that in belgrade where they have already understood that we we will attack, well , of course they prepared better, of course they added there... forces, means, so it's not worth it to worry about such a rapid advance in kurshchyna and in other places now, the rapid advance may be there in a place where they don't expect our strikes, well, as they say girkin strilkov, maybe it will be in the crimea, who knows, so let's understand what about the simple courts, yes, they wanted to say about these, that there should have flowed from the pokrovsky direction, it also comes from such people who... and for some reason s