bill barr being one of them. system actually worked to some extent, but it depends who you're trying to convict. i think so far >> thanks to all of you, marie, jonathan, katie pavlich as well. and the past 2, 3 hours, dana, it calls to mind how important it was to strike first on thursday night and the american people can decide whether or not the presentation on thursday night was the most effective as possible. the last couple of hours, might have been lacking. we'll see what we get. >> dana: that is it for us. "america reports" starts right now with john roberts and jacqui heinrich. >> john: thank you, far left activists are holding a protest outside the supreme court just days after a crazed man allegedly tried to assassinate justice brett kavanaugh. >> the high court could strike down roe vs. wade any moment, but focusing on crimes 17 months ago, critics say biden's justice department is ignoring swaying judges outside of their homes, a federal crime. team coverage straight

you have bill stepien, a.g. barr, and then the committee showed one by one that those people started to fade away, that the only person left was rudy giuliani and his false outlandish claims. you had bill stepien saying, look, i wanted to make sure my rep take was intact and the things i saw were not honest and professional. you saw a.g. barr saying that he told former president trump directly, the doj does not take sides in elections. there is no evidence of fraud. and by the way, we are not your personal legal team. and then you saw jared kushner lay out that he told president trump directly, this is not the approach that you should be taking. and former president trump saying that he had confidence in rudy giuliani. so really, the lawmakers today, the committee today, was really showing how this inner circle of president trump, it just shrunk and shrunk and shrunk, and we now have the people that are here, but there is another point to be made, which is that while this lie grew and grew and metastasized, it also b

i believe bill barr. jackie, you have been covering this from the start, you were in the room tonight, tell us what it was like especially when the video was playing. >> yes, stephanie, it was a heavy night all around. lots of new information came at people in the audience that left tears flowing and mouths open, at some points. i think the less, during the moments where lawmakers weren't talking i think were the most powerful moments ultimately. when we heard directly from people like caroline edwards who described in really shocking and graphic detail about watching her colleague capitol police officer brian sicknick in his final moments who later passed the next day, in what was perhaps the most chilling moment throughout the entire hearing, her voice was quivering at times and walked the audience watching him turn as pale as a sheet of paper and that was blacked out in a concussion, woke up being out of consciousness and ran over to the west capitol from the bike racks and shortly thereafter, she was

i don't blame her. -- blame bill barr. this is proof that you could not stop an election from going. we are better off losing the election, so to speak and then , coming back. that's the way our democracy should work. you don't always win, you don't always lose, and that's why we are still here you have to be resilient. host: let me ask you this. who should run in 2024 on the republican ticket? caller: that's a good question. i think trump would win. he is still divisive. i like to santos, of course. i think he is representative of what's happening in the country. host: what about the former indiana governor, former vice president mike pence? caller: he is a great guy, but he has no charisma. he will not bring in enough people. he's a really great guy. i really do like him. i like our cabinet that we have. we have great people. i will just quickly say, the cabinet for biden is inferior to our cabinet. host: let me hear from joe in maryland, democratic: -- democratic caller. your view on the 48 vice president? caller: he wa

and bill barr alluded to it, right? that he was detached from reality.le i think there is ample proof that he knew, or at least was told, you would still have to prove that he intended to fill in the blank, fraud investors, mislead voters, obstruct congress, right? to do all of these things requires a level of intent that is always difficult to prove. so, yes and no. yes, lots of people told him that he lost, any rational, thoughtful person would understand that and internalize it and process it. this guy seemed utterly incapable of doing that. so i think there's still a bit of an open question about his intent. by the way, the fact that we have an open question about intent doesn't mean it can be proved by some other means, and in a court of law. there's lots of ways to prove intent. we're only seeing some of it so far, stephanie. there's a lot more to come, i imagine. >> stephanie, you know the trump family very well. what is your take, when we hear now, bill barr, saying that president trump was detached from reality? he started his political career,

but as bill barr called those lawyers, quote, the clown car. the thing that will happen now is what does this mean? he was told repeatedly there was no fraud. i'm told the committee, the next place they're taking it is he was told that if he continues down this road, there could be violence and that leads to january 6th. >> abby, is the committee trying to build a legal case potentially against trump by following the so-called money trail? >> i think that they're trying to collect all the evidence, put it out in the public sphere, and we know that they are planning to turn over what they have to the justice department. the committee members, including congresswoman zoe lofgren who was here earlier, they're being very careful to say we don't know what the criminality element of all this is, but there is certainly a grift element of it, where people were making money off this lie. the trump family and those connected to him. and i do think there is, especially for the individuals who we now know are knowingly perpetrating the big lie in part thro

his own attorney general, you can't dismiss bill barr as an anti-trump hack. no, you can't dismiss bill stepian as a hack, he was campaign manager and you can't dismiss ivanka as a anti-trump hack, she's his daughter. and the voices that are being used and yes, they are delayed and they should have spoken up in realtime but this is now on the record for history and perhaps for the justice department, the january 6 house committee second public hearing included new testimony from president trump's inner circle. key witnesses describing how the former president refused to listen to the facts ignoring top aides who said he was told claims of election fraud were not true and that he had lost. instead, they painted a picture of how trump embraced false claims that that election was stolen. all of this leading up to the january 6 attack on the capitol. here is former attorney general bill barr and former acting deputy attorney general richard donahue. >> there was an avalanche of allegations of fraud that built up a number of days and it was like playing whack-a-mole

bill barr knows full well the following.tment going back to -- said the 1970s has over a dozen memoranda from the office of legal counsel stating i have absolute testimonial immunity, absolute immunity. there's no way that committee should do what they're doing. the justice department never should -- >> martha: you're talking about your executive privilege? >> executive privilege goes hand and hand, martha, with testimonial immunity. executive privilege is that of president trump. it's not my privilege to waive. i told the committee as well as the department of justice repeatedly that it's not my privilege to waive. >> martha: sir -- >> let me make this point, this is a critical point. what the justice department should have done as the committee should have done is first negotiate the privilege with donald trump. secondly, if they didn't do that, that was the least burdensome alternative. the second least burdensome was the civil case, not a criminal case. this came up when bill barr was at the justice department in the mye

you be bill barr. mr. rr, you say you remined because donald trump was making crazy allegations of fraud and you thought he was detached from reality, right? >> yes. >> do you remember writing a resignation on december 14th 2020? >> i do. >> and in that letter, you told donald trump you were continuing to investigate his allegations of fraud, right? >> right. >> and you praised donald trump for advancing the rule of law, didn't you? >> yes, this is getting uncomfortable. >> and it will get a little more uncomfortable for, you said you would still vote for donald trump in 2024, correct? >> correct. >> by the way, all of this stuff, none of it's criminal -- i did not see any evidence of donald trump i'm being bill barr here -- conduct that. >> it's powerful, it's effective but let's keep everything in check. >> and this gets to the roles that see merge from the hearings him i'm glad we did that role play. i do want to ask about bill stems stepien, his wife was having a baby yesterday. we did see videotaped de

by playing video of bill barr. the things that came out of bill barr's mouth last night are things that we knew about what he has said to the president and his view of things. but what it did was, you heard bill barr essentially cursing on national television, sitting in a deposition. he was the person who was largely seen as the great trump ally possible. someone who was able to lead the justice department in a way that trump, you know, forever dreamed. and here he was, you know, explicitly, you know, using an expletive, laying out what he told the president. and bringing a to life, you know, was a challenge for them. and i think the videos were able to help them do that. >> is there a feeling on the hill, sahil, that they were effective, number one. and where do they take that from here? what do we look for specifically on monday? >> reporter: the committee hopes they will be effective. they're right to reach a couple of different types of americans. those who might be sympathetic to their argument about january

the democrats were perpetrating some kind of terrible shenanigans around the election. >> bill barrbeen celebrated, remember they hated him and wanted to impeach him like muscle leaning now they love him because he's useful. >> the former trump aides refused to testify and gets lame for stonewalling and those cooperated like the former attorney general get slammed with why you're only telling us now is seems like a no-win situation. >> bill barr's book came up every 28, i don't know what they're talking about, there's been plenty of information about his criticism of trump's been out for months but the media love and trump turncoat and bill barr was the greatest one out of the entire administration because he really was loyal to the president and he really aggravated democrats and trump critics throughout trump's tenure defended the president in particular on the mueller report and the whole russian collusion nonsense, that really angered democrats he was really enemy number one but now here he is the start of the january 6 primetime show and he was an absolute star and he served th

whatever and that trump has no claim to winning this election, where was bill barr? >> may i bifurcate that? >> go ahead. >> let's take that second. >> table it. >> first, from a legal analytical perspective, what was the committee doing trying to show just about everyone under oath didn't want to help steal the election, at least when it became untenable. >> we were trying to establish trump's criminal intent. it is important as a legal matter to know that if you are accused of stealing something, tough know that it's not yours. you have to know that you're stealing it. it has to not be an accident. and so what happened today is that we saw barr stepien say to trump, you lost the election. so then when he tries to steal it, he knows they are stealing. the way it works, you have to listen to the evidence that's ginn to you. you can't go, my lawyers and accountant says i have to pay taxes, but found some wino on the street that i don't have to pay taxes. that's not how it works. it's not going work for trump hiding bin giuliani and sidney powell, powell who said in he

look at the bill barr stuff.e bill barr deposition is that he kept his mouth shut when it matters for the country. he kept his mouth shut because he was afraid, either afraid or trying to keep information to himself until he could sell books or whatever he might want to try and do. this is about leadership failure, and it's about people not discharging their oaths to the country, and it's a story that needs to be told. >> congressman jason crow of colorado, thank you, sir. >>> the white house is facing criticism over president biden's upcoming trip to saudi arabia. i'm going to speak with the former u.s. ambassador to the kingdom about it next. what's on the horizon? the answers lie beyond the roads we know. we recognize that energy dand is growing, and the world nes lower carbon solutions to keep up. at chevron, we'reorking to find new ways forward, through vestments and partnerships in iovative solutions. like renewable natural gas from cow waste, hydrogen-fueled transportation, and carbon capture. we may not k

called and crazy stuff rather than reality for some bill barr also said there was zero places ofnued at the time that certain voting machines were rigged against him and were rigged in order to give more votes to his rival, joe biden. the hearing was also told that all election night in 2020, donald trump ignored the advice of members of his inner circle not to go out and declare victory, instead deciding to do so on the advice of his inebriated personal attorney rudy giuliani, the former mayor of new york. the vice chair of the committee, liz cheney, said today that donald trump falsely told the american people that the election was not legitimate and millions of americans believed him. all right, david willis, we will leave it there, but we will be tracking the congressional hearing very closely with you and all the others on the ground reporting on the story. thanks very much for the moment. you're watching newsday on the bbc. still to come on the programme: authorities in india's most populous state — uttar pradesh — demolish houses belonging to some muslims for allegedly par

we heard a little from bill barr, and in that taped testimony, he talked about having to fend off alleasingly wild conspiracy theories. and he said that donald trump, at one stage, was detached from reality, as mr barr put it, and he was pursuing what bill barr called nonsense and crazy stuff rather than reality. and bill barr also said there was zero basis in fact for mr trump's contention at the time that certain voting machines were rigged against him and were rigged in order to give more votes to his rival, joe biden. the hearing was also told that on election night in 2020, donald trump ignored the advice of members of his inner circle not to go out and declare victory. he instead decided to do so on the advice of his inebriated personal attorney rudy giuliani, the former mayor of new york. the vice chair of the committee, liz cheney, said today that donald trump falsely told the american people that the election was not legitimate and millions of americans believed him. david willis, and along with our other team of reporters, will be tracking the hearings very closely here on t

>> bill barr would. >> bill barr -- that's right. that's right. that's right. well, that's right. of this testimony? >> i think it was a really dynamic legal case. remember, talking about if the charge was something like defrauding the united states government or the electorate based on unlawful or improper purposes, you have to first prove there was an agreement. a meeting of the mind. you're doing to do this very thing. you're going to at least use deceptive practices in some way or fraudulent practices to promote a lie. you have to have an overt act. that could be any of the meetings, any of the tweets. any of the speeches. any moment you say i'm going to appeal to the american public based on this fraud. but the thing is it has to be for this unlawful or corrupt purpose. corrupt could be this criminal intent. the idea of look, i know it's wrong and i'm going to do it anyway. or it could be an improper purpose, meaning you know you don't have any state certifying in your favor. you have exhausted all your remedies and you want to remain in

it video clip of the testimony, it was bill barr. it was a surprise to me. not think he would be the first witness that we saw. i think they did this for two reasons. one, bill barr in one word, an expletive at what's at that, laid to rest any question of whether he had corrupt intent. he said i went into the oval office and said, mister president, your claims of election fraud are bs. katie, you know how we prove corrupt in tenth in court? we have to try to infer that they have corrupt intent basquiat on facts, evidence, and circumstances. no defendant ever says, excuse me, i'm about to commit a crime and i have intent corrupt intent. if bill barr says that you are lying mister president, the election was not stolen. this provides circumstantial evidence to allow the jury to infer the intent was corrupt. the second reason that it was a really savvy tactical move to open with bill barr, he is a republican voice. he was not the only republican voice that we heard from during the first hearing. we heard from marc short, jason miller, we heard from the republic

>> i think i like the bill barr the testimony better than the bill barr saying he would still vote for president trump. they're really, really late to this party. it's better late than never. you know, again, i always use the bar fight auntil ji. even if you're getting beat, if somebody comes in at the end and helps you out, that's a good ing this. i think bill barr did that and allowed the republicans -- and let be honest. the republicans up there were not shrinking violets. i think it's better late than never. but it's really astounding to me that anybody who said the things that bill barr said in testimony would still say he would vote for president trump, i think that's a really issue. i think that's a problem with tribalism in this country. i think it's a problem with the propaganda that you see pumped into republican circles. you talked about 2,000 mules. i think, you know, when you look at something like that, i am a geofencing expert. i do know geolocation. i do know all the technical terms for that, and when you see something like that and you talk about things like that and i

the most important, number one was bill barr. number two was ivanka trump. they showed trump knew he had lost this election, so all of his activity was corrupt. and finally the georgia prosecutor we got reports perhaps brad raffensperger, the georgia secretary of state. he had the infamous trump telling him in a tape recorded call, john, just find 11,780 votes. so the evidence is accumulating. >> so, john, is there any risk the doj should pursue a criminal case against high level people involved in the insurrection leaning too helavily on the committee? could the defense lawyer argue they shouldn't overlap? >> they'll have their own grand jury, they'll collect their own evidence. i think they are collecting their own evidence right at this time. they have witnesses the committee may or may not know of. justice does not need the hill to help them. >> so, norm, in terms of what's to come jake tapper asked chairman bennie thompson if there are going to be witnesses that describe actual conversations between extremist groups and anyone in trump's orbit. the answ

i want to play who i described as the star witness today, former ag, bill barr. and what he describes as the former president's detachment from reality and what team normal were telling him was happening as related to the election. >> i thought, boy, if he really believes this stuff he has lost contact with -- he's become detached from reality if he really believes this stuff. on the other hand, when i went into this and would, you know, tell him how crazy some of these allegations were, there was never an indication of interest in what the actual facts were. in my opinion then and my opinion now, the election was not stolen by fraud. >> how effective is the case they put on today? >> enormously effective because it was republicans, trump loyalists, members of his administration, his attorney general, members of his senior campaign team, who were all telling him from the beginning that there is no evidence of mass fraud, that this insistence you have of the election being stolen is not true, not rooted in reality, detached from reality. those are the voices you n

let's start with bill barr here.his is bill barr talking about the work he did to try to chase down some of these claims. >> the department, in fact, when we received specific and credible allegations of fraud made an effort to look into these to satisfy ourselves that they were without merit. and i was in the posture of trying to figure out -- there was an avalanche of all of these allegations of fraud that built up over a number of days, and it was like playing whac-a-mole, something would come out one day, and the next day it would be another issue. i was influenced by the fact that all of the early claims that i understood were completely bogus and silly, and usually based on complete misinformation, and so i didn't consider the quality of claims right out of the box to give me any, you know, feeling that there was really substance here. >> their effectiveness of the presentation. >> that's right. very effective because he's talking to somebody who was unquestionably a partisan of the president. it's something wh

ivanka trump also testified that she put credence in what bill barr said.e also heard the committee try to use donald trump's own words or own tweets in some cases against him. listen. >> at 6:01 p.m. on january 6th after he spent hours watching a violent mob besiege, attack and invade our capitol, donald trump tweeted, but he did not condemn the attack, instead he justified it. these are the things and events that happen, he said, when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously and viciously stripped away from great patriots. >> i thought it was so interesting that liz cheney used this particular tweet because we've known about this tweet since donald trump sent it at 6:01 p.m. on january 6. i have always felt this is one of the most underrated but important pieces of evidence. we talk about donald trump's intent in the lead up to january 6 itself. you want an insight into donald trump's intent about the capitol attack, about what happened that day, look at this tweet. he sends it hours, just a few hours after the attack is over. they've ran

she had long since checked out and was, in my opinion, and we try to be respectful to bill barr and -- he sucked. >> even though attorney general bill barr and ivanka knew the election was not stolen, we should keep in mind, they never used platform so forcefully say the election was free and fair. in fact, barr's resignation letter insidious ember of 2020. in that letter he endorsed the investigation into fraud he now admits was bs! before last night, we have gotten contemporaneous reporting that barr's own doj staff was concerned about trump's coup attempt. the last night the committee revealed exactly what trump son-in-law jarred thought of all the lawyers threatening to quit. >> jarred, are you aware of instances where pat cipollone threatened to resign? >> i kind of -- like i said, my interest in that time was trying to get as many pardons done. and i know that he was always -- him in the team were saying, oh, we are going to resign, we are not going to be here if this or that happens. i kind of took it up to just be whining, to be honest with you. >> again, that was new. jared k

bill barr didn't make any bones of who he was.a partisan that wanted to see his president succeed and in 2020 as we've reported, repeatedly, he was getting fed up. not just that president trump was detached from reality, but that he was consistently undermining the safety of the country. you know, even bill barr, it was too far for him to claim or stand by while the election was claimed to be rigged because that was going to hurt republicans in the long term, in his view, to question the integrity of the election with no credible evidence. i think one of the important strengths of bill bar's testimony whether you want to karate chop him, the strength of his argument is that he had a team. he deputized u.s. attorneys across the country and specifically in swing states with fbi agents to dig interest all of these claims that rudy giuliani kept throwing up on the wall like spaghetti, he had his team look at them and so when the president was in these private meetings saying, bill, why aren't you guys doing anything about this, he cou

bill barr said there was zero basis that certain voting machines were rigged against him. of those congressional hearings and we will be tracking those developments. you're watching newsday on the bbc. still to come on the programme: why a buzz lightyear animated origin film has been banned in 14 middle eastern and asian countries. there was a bomb in the city centre. a code word known to be one used by the ira was given. army bomb experts were examining a suspect van when there was a huge explosion. the south african parliament has destroyed the foundation of apartheid by abolishing the population registration act which, for 40 years, forcibly classified each citizen according to race. just a day old and the royal baby is tonight sleeping in his cot at home. | early this evening, the new prince was taken by his mother and fatherl to their apartments . in kensington palace. germany's parliament, the bundestag, has voted by a narrow majority to move the seat of government from bonn to berlin. berliners celebrated into the night, but the decision was greeted with shock in bo

in fact, bill barr called it bs. ivanka trump said she believed bill barr. donald trump was told repeatedly than, according to the testimony that was shown in these video excerpts by congresswoman liz cheney. now at the same time, they also detail some new revelations, including that there was some republicans in the house who were concerned about their role on january 6th and actually asked donald trump for pardons of their actions. now she says one of those is congressman scott perry. he is a conservative from pennsylvania. others -- others as well. but they would not detail members of the committee did not say who those other members were. now the committee also showed new footage of just how harrowing an experience it was that day on january 6th. all the violence that occurred, the deadly massacre that occurred in the capitol and heard testimony from a documentarian who was close to the proud boys as well as one officer who was injured in responding to the deadly events of that day. now this is the first of a number of hearings that will take place throu

the former atorney general, bill barr, described donald trump as being "detached from reality" in his20 election was stolen from him. mr trump's former campaign manager bill stepien was not able to appear, so the committee used video clips from his earlier testimony. let's take a listen to what he and bill barr had to say. my belief, my recommendation was to say that votes were still being counted, it's too early to tell, too early to call the race, but, you know, we're proud of the race we ran and we, you know, think we're in a good position and we will have more to say about this, you know, the next day or the next day, whenever we had something to say. and did anybody who was a part of that conversation disagree with your message? yes. who was that? the president disagreed with that. i don't recall the particular words. he thought i was wrong. he told me so, and, you know, that they were going to, you know... he was going to go in a different direction. i did not agree with the idea of saying the election was stolen and putting out this stuff, which i told the president was bleep.

so listen, bill barr, they showed testimony from bill barr. i'm not going to play it.x of it. he said that i told the president it was, his words, bullshit and i didn't want to be part of it and that was one of the reasons that i left, that he left. right? >> yeah, clearly -- >> him deciding to leave, he said. >> one of the most effective tools they used tonight was the video clips of former trump administration officials, general milley of course, and i thought former attorney general barr. very, very effective for the committee to be able to puncture this myth that trump for some reason actually thought that the election had been stolen. they did that effectively by putting people up like the former attorney general, like ivanka trump, all of whom said we knew there was no evidence to indicate that there was a significant amount of fraud. multiple people told the president that. there's essential no reason why trump should have continued perpetuating the big lie. >> representative jamie raskin a select committee member back in april said there were revelations, that

same with bill barr. when you have people like these people with reputations that are long in politics and understand the numbers, part of, quote, team normal giving him advice, yet he chooses to go with team whiskey tango foxtrot with rudy giuliani, who is inebriated, that does go to show that he certainly has some detachment from reality. and, look, this is a problem for a lot of reasons because, look, these are people that wanted him to win, clearly wanted him to win. don, i was on your program on the night of election night in 2020 saying he needs to stop discrediting the election. he needs to stop saying that this was a bogus election. but he did that that night and continued to do so because he wanted to discredit the election because he did not want to admit defeat. >> you said it would hurt him. >> absolutely. and rudy giuliani has had more than 60 times to produce the cr kraken in a court of law to show the election was fraudulent. he has come up with nothing. now we're looking back at this, we h

and former attorney general bill barr said the election was clean and his daughter agreed. >> i madeclear that i did not agree with saying the election was stolen and putting out this stuff which i told the president was -- and i didn't want to be a part of it. and it's why i decided to leave when i did. >> and they are down playing the effect, and saying that ivanka trump was not involved in looking at or studying election results she had long since checked out and was only trying to be respectful to bill barr in his position as attorney general, he sucked. and one denied that he asked for a pardon from the president. >> representative perry was seeking a presidential pardon en. others sought presidential pardons. >> congressman perry tweeting the notion that i sought a presidential pardon, was a shameless and soulless lie. and president biden weighing in saying the future of democracy is at stake. >> it's important for the people to understand what happened. it's the same forces that led january 6th, is at work today. >> reporter: they have laid out a road map, they will focus on t

trump's former attorney general, bill barr, testified about trump's detachment, not just from reality but, in many, many cases, the truth. so, i want to hold on here. bill barr making his argument that trump was detached from the truth and that's why he had to make a stand, it doesn't make very much sense. because the truth is, trump has been detached from the truth and pushing falsehoods since the beginning. i want to remind you trump repeatedly claimed he one man of the year award in michigan years ago. guess what, that award never existed. then, year after year he overstated his personal wealth so he could get on to the forbes 400 list. we should never forget sharpiegate, were trump pointed to an incorrect map to try to prove his own incorrect hurricane forecast. those are just three little examples. the washington post has over 30,000. so, while bill barr standing up for the truth under oath now, neither he, nor the rest of the administration did it thousands of times before. there is a lot we've got to cover tonight. so, let's get smarter with the help of our lead off panel, puli

bill barr is one example.disservice to the country with his fraud allegations. you served in government, so i want you to talk to this point. i mean, talk about serving for the public good and if, you know, if there's a very real danger for those in government who say and do things publicly than what they are doing privately, because it seemed bill barr, from election day until january 6th, was not doing enough publicly to come out and criticize the president, saying this is just a bunch of bologna, as he was claiming to do behind closed doors. >> well, look, in normal times, of course, in a normal administration, in a normal government agency, there's going to be some daylight potentially between what you talk about publicly and what you advise privetly because you want to have confidential conversations. there are a lot of conversations that you don't want to have aired publicly, so that there can be a deliberation. you give your boss decision space. but this was no normal time, and this is an entirely diffe

he to change my mind on that. -- bill bar. -- bill barr.— bill bar. -- bill barr. ns about machines being fraudulent were groundless.— groundless. they obviously were influencing _ groundless. they obviously were influencing a _ influencing a lot of people, members of the public that there — members of the public that there was this systemic corruption in the system and that— corruption in the system and that vote _ corruption in the system and that vote did not count and these — that vote did not count and these machines controlled by somebody else were determining it which— somebody else were determining it which was complete nonsense and it _ it which was complete nonsense and it was — it which was complete nonsense and it was being laid out that and it was being laid out that and i— and it was being laid out that and i told them that it was crazy— and i told them that it was crazy stuff and they were wasting their time on it. it was — wasting their time on it. it was a _ wasting their time on it. it was a grave, grave disservice to the — was a grave, grave disse

i think that the only question is why did it take bill barr so long to speak today? but i think the committee really knew that barr would jump out as a very senior cabinet member, jake. >> jamie, committee member zoe lofgren used the end of the hearing today to talk about how much he raised on the big lie, he called it the big rip-off and said members of the family were benefitted from the skcheme. after the hearing, i asked her about it. take a listen. >> for example, we know that guilfoyle was paid for the introduction she gave at the speech. i mean, on january 6th, she received compensation for that. >> is that a crime? >> i'm not saying it's a crime, but i think it's a grift. >> kim guilfoyle, donald trump jr.'s fiancee. what role does the money from the big lie play in this investigation? >> i think this is a critical part of the investigation. there was a team called the green team, and it was just to go after this. follow the money. i have spoken to people about this. they don't know where it goes as far as could there be criminal charges. but there are real qu

what do you think general mukasey about the notion of testimony to date by bill barr. what was your reaction to that testimony that you heard? >> that testimony, actually, it was known before it was disclosed in the hearings. that was in his book. he talked about it before that. that seen on december 1 where he , as you point out, describe what the president was pushing. said he found no evidence to support them. and offered to resign. the president slammed his hand down and said accepted and then bill barr walked out of the loop the room and had to be chased down. he went back to the justice department and they did not speak again until afterward but, he testified, exactly the way it happened. he testified to what he did and what he did was his job. what mike pence did was his job. and, one of your colleagues said before that we shouldn't really need heroes. the fact is that there is no rule that applies itself. there is always somebody that has to apply the rule ended here to the role. the fact that we had people applying the rules and adhering to the rules, if you w

and former attorney general bill barr, a very loil a.g. to the former president, now emerging as a key witness in these hearings. in that videotaped testimony saying today in the weeks following the election with the former president and these false claims, barr says he became demoralized himself, saying if the president believed those lies, that the president had, as i mentioned, become detached from reality. tonight here, the never before seen testimony, the top trump campaign aids, his daughter ivanka trump, her husband jared kushner, and a portrait inside the trump white house of election night and of the weeks leading up to january 6th. abc's chief washington correspondent jonathan karl leading us off tonight from capitol hill. >> reporter: with recorded testimony from some of the people closest to donald trump, the january 6th committee revealed what was going on inside the white house late on election night 2020, as trump was urged not to declare victory by his campaign manager. >> it was far too early to be making any calls like th

part of what you have to do is bill barr, not the most non-partisan guy in the world, but bill barr sayingr you as your personal attorneys. they don't do your bidding. they don't try to win your case of public opinion in conveying wild conspiracy theories that are not at all backed by facts. they have to convey just how much they were trying to take over the machinery of justice in the united states of american to turn it over to his theory to legitimize a coup essentially. >> this won't come up tomorrow i don't think. but the justice department in those last six months, last year of trump's administration or even going back to when barr started enabled trump in ways that were extraordinary, that went beyond what sessions had done. so, if you're trump, and there's absolutely no excuse for that type of behavior, he's probably trying wondering where bill barr -- >> right. >> tomorrow when they bring these justice department officials up there, i don't think they're going to be asking about how michael cohen was thrown in prison in the summer of 2016 -- summer of 2020. and i don't think they'

lead federal prosecutor there and worked for the department of justice under then attorney general bill barrsked by attorney general barr to investigate claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election? and if so, what were those claims? >> thank you for the question. approximately december 4th, i believe, of 2020, attorney general barr and i had a conversation about an unrelated case to the case at issue. at the end of the conversation, mr. barr had asked me if i had seen a certain videotape that was being reported in the news where mr. giuliani in a senate subcommittee hearing that was held the day before, may 3rd, showed a videotape of a purportedly security tape at the state farm arena in atlanta, which is also in fulton county, the city of atlanta. at the time, mr. barr asked me that he had made a public statement that he had not seen any widespread election fraud that would question the outcome of the election. and because of the videotape and the serious allegation mr. giuliani was making with respect to the suitcase full of ballots purported in the video, he asked me to find out what i cou

but all of them, bill barr, ivanka, jared, mark meadows, bill stepien, could have said something publicly at the time. on monday, we heard from former u.s. attorney general bjay pak, he resigned rather than go along with the big lie which is admirable and noble, but again he also could have said something. all these people had a platform. they could have just spoken the simple truth publicly not one of them did. bill barr kind of in a quote to an ap reporter. so, trump supporters, well, they believed that trump was united behind the big lie. they believed what they were told, to great consequences, as liz cheney laid out in monday's hearing. >> hundreds of our countrymen her face criminal charges. many are serving criminal sentences. because they believed what donald trump said about the election. and they acted on it. they came to washington d. c. at his request. they marched on the capitol at his request. >> and they repeated donald trump's lies, practically word for word, at the capitol, on january 6th. >> [inaudible] >> they think they are going to [inaudible] us out of our vote. they

you are going to see trump lawyers and trump's kind of lawyer, guys like bill barr, who frankly, in bill barr's case, happily spread trump lies before and after the election, that democrats were perpetrating some kind of terrible shenanigans around the election. bill barr, who was as much of a problem on this issue in terms of making false claims about the election ahead of things really going to hell in a handbasket around january 6th -- bill barr, for all that he did wrong, specifically on this issue, nevertheless, bill barr is bailing out on trump now and testifying under oath that everything trump was pushing to the public was ally and he knew is a lie. another trump lawyer, richard donahue, number two at the justice department after barr left, he was right there, along with bill barr, actually inserting himself into the process and making the justice department spend real resources investigating these made up, ridiculous on their face fraud claims, as if they were real things. richard donahue helping very much in that regard -- but in the end, nevertheless, bailing out when he was a

hear bill barr is putting the knife into donald trump. hard for merrick garland to ignore it. >> where were the highlights of the hearing tonight for you? >> to me it was a continuation of that, was mark twain who said that a lion can travel halfway around the world before the truth is revealed. that is true, that is why so many people believed on trump, it takes time to disprove it. the committee helped the truth catch up and surpassed the lie. he did it the easy way, rather than try to show the complex ways this election will bear the lies of trump, they had trump's own people say it. not only explain what they also are, but what they all told him. all in all, it was clear that they really showed trump's own people the loyal people who i experienced during the first impeachment, how they stood by him and defended the indefensible. here, they said enough, a line has been crossed, we will defend democracy. they showed how trump has been fraud. -- their democracy, and their dollars, which is also important. democracy is complex and abstrac

that is why they offered bill barr up for us.claim that the election was stolen, your claim of election fraud is bs. that lays to rest donald trump 's criminal intent because no one i have ever prosecuted interviewers said that i will conduct myself and engage in criminal acts, by the way, i have criminal intent, we infer intent by statements and circumstances. it was a strong opening. >> i was not just bill barr. it was also jason miller, who is a real trumpian, who said that he was in the room when the then president told him that it gives up there, you did not win the election. building this case that donald trump knew, therefore, he misled his supporters, anyway, tua became an attack on the united states capitol. >> can i build on that? this is my only criticism about the hearing. that is that it starts out on this criminal intent issue. that is the key. and then it jumps to january six. maybe it is that i am norwegian, but i am all about chronology. >> i don't know the reference to norwegian -- >> we are very linear -- [laug

but then she said she believed bill barr. know, they talked to ivanka trump three times, she did three different interviews, jared kushner did three different interviews, eric trump did two interviews, donald trump jr. did one interview and they tried get him to do another. i said why were they so focused on evivanka trump and jared kushner said why did they do three interviews, and they wanted to know, i would imagine, what was she doing, what was her mindset, what had she told her father during and possibly other advisers during that time, so they were focused on her and jared kushner because they were advisers to the president, rather than just on sort of the color around eric trump and donald trump jr. >> what is so interesting about alex hold and the fact of this documentary is that somehow it only entered into the national consciousness in the last few weeks. the committee only found out about it recently. the footage was only turned over recently. alex holder has known about it for a long time. did you get a sense of w