so, colonel bill cowan, what's going on here? what are they worrying about? >> well, neil, think it goes back to wanting a little bit more evidence, and the further away we get from the actual incident the less likely we for find evidence. the u.n. inspectors will come back and okay there was a chemical attack. the real question is who did it and i don't believe the u.n. inspectors will determine that. so asaud ought to be feeling pretty good about life because things are on his side. >> neil: do you read anything, colonel, into the fact that we were rush, rush, rush, go, go, go, and i know the u.n. wants to wait until these inspectors wrap things up on friday. then it isn't immediate. they have to file a report. i'm sure they can expedite that but i know how things go at the ewan. let's say they rush it. is that the signal we're getting, maybe we're not sure the were chemical weapons or we're not sure whether assad himself used them? >> listen, neil. i like that question for this reason. our intelligence on this whole thing has probably been pretty good from