bill hwang was responsible for his own funds.ade the case that it was his own better, not investors' money, although we do know separately that the banks themselves have lost a significant amount of money through engaging in these agreements with hwang's firm. now, we look at the defense here, and they also talk about the nature of the bets themselves. you may remember, when all of the started to unravel, it was around viacom cbs, so you do have the defense attorney speaking to a jury largely not versed in the world of finance, caroline. and explaining that bill hwang was betting on stocks that he believed in, and that's why he was betting so much. some of the earlier bets, like netflix, were hugely profitable for him back in the day, and now when he was thinking about the new to put to work, he was making the case that content is king, like you're saying, and that's why he bet so much on viacom essentially to borrow money. ed: if u.s. prosecutors, this is a big white collar crime case. you know, it's up there in terms of the sai