the bill of rights. ink if you ask any american today who is not familiar with constitutional history, which is most americans, freedom of speech, freedom of religion -- why didn't they care? why didn't they include that? happened, those of you from virginia or fans of george mason's basketball team, he also was there and said you know, we are getting towards the end. we need a bill of rights. by the way, i can do one very quickly. do one very quickly. how did he know? because he had already written one for virginia. when we get the final bill of rights, it is a lot like the virginia bill of rights. the framers, the people at the constitutional convention voted unanimously by state delegation not to include a bill of rights. ,here is lots of speculation some people say they were just sick of each other, it had been a long, hot on her. philadelphia had an invasion of black flies, they had to keep the windows closed for secrecy, they were wearing full suits air conditioning, no deodorant, and they had been

i think other people said well we don't need a bill of rights. who could imagine a time when we would take away the right to trial? who can imagine a time when you wouldn't get a lawyer or that you could be held indefinitely without trial? so some people oppose the bill of rights and said we don't need this because it is so obvious that no one in their right mind would ever argue that an american citizen or someone apprehended or accused of a crime in the united states would be held without limit, would be sent to a camp in another country and held forever without a trial? none of our founding fathers ever imagined that could happen. and yet here we are, here we are at a time where just four or five years ago, this body passed a bill that says an american citizen can be detained forever. that an american citizen accused of a crime in the united states could be sent to a foreign camp and held forever without trial. when you mentioned this to people, people are incredulous. they are like is the person that would october to the bill of rights -- that

the sexual assault survivors' bill of rights does just that, by recognizing survivors' basic civil rights. while we can call attention to a culture of toxic masculinity and the need to disrupt power dynamics, this bill creates long-term change and gives power and control back to survivors. all survivors must be protected and this bill must be enacted in all 50 states. thank you. senator grassley: thank you, mr. crews. i'll say that again, i didn't have my microphone on, thank you, mr. crews and thank you, ms. nguyen. we'll start with you. you have made a difference in the lives of many victims of sexual assault through your persistence and what you're doing at the state level as well as what you've already accomplished at the federal level. it's my understanding you've had quite a success in some states. how has the public responded to the passage of the federal survivors' bill of rights? ms. nguyer: thank you, senator, for your question. incredible an experience to witness this spread across. on average, the sexual assault survivor bill of rights has passed a law a month which is incredi

i rewrote the law working with members of congress to draft a survivor bill of rights. this bill would earn the distinction of being one of the few pieces of legislation passed unanimously by congress in recent memory. more importantly, it it codified forsic bill of rights survivors across the country. though i never imagined the challenges i would face, nor did i imagine the power, progress and the hope that would arrive from my ordeal. nonprofit called rise to teach other survivors had to pen their own rights into existence and carry out the success we had in congress into the 50 states, where most rape cases are adjudicated. to date, our team has worked with local survivors to secure passage of 18 laws with more on the way. most rape cases are adjudicated in state court, it is necessary for these rights to the past on a state-by-state level in the united states. i ask that each of you sitting here today to help bring the civil rights to your own communities and to your own states were survivors need it. i ask that you realize your position of privilege and power. the

examining that in the bill of rights act of 2016. president obama signed the bill in october and witnesses also included rape victim who helped offer the act. in the deputy director of the national institute of justice. this is an hour and 35 minutes. welcome everybody. thank you for joining us at a very important hearing. this morning our committee will focus on an issue of in norma's importance in ensuring that victims of sexual violence are fairly treated through the criminal justice system. two years ago we made important progress in this areama by incorporating a package of new rates and forrp victims of sexual violence and we obviously put that in the federal criminal code. by law they now have the right to have their evidence preserved for a specific time to be notified before the evidence is destroyed and to receive the results of forensic exam. today, we will review that law. known as the survivors bill of rights. we will also explore additional ways to encourage more victims of sexual violence to come forward we welcome back

members of the senate judiciary committee examine the limitation of the sexual assault survivors bill of rights act of 2016 after it was signed into law in october 2016. this is an hour and a half. committee. >> welcome, everybody. thank you for joining us. this morning, our committee will in normann issue of is important, ensuring victims of sexual violence are fairly treated through our criminal justice system. two years ago, we made the progress in this area by incorporating a package of new rights for victims of sexual violence and we put that in the federal criminal code. by law, victims of rape in federal cases now have the right to have their sexual assault evidence preserved for a specific enforcement and receivd the results of a forensic exam. today, we will review the implementations of that wall. we will also explore additional ways to encourage more victims to come forward and report crimes to the authorities, so we amanda to this committee. after working closely with her on multiple drafts of that legislation, the judiciary committee appropriated these rights to the pre-authorizati

-- sexual assault bill of rights. on the day that i was raped, i imagined a have greater injustice that awaited me than the one i had already been forced to endure. imagined a greateras a child, i learned toe that we all have access to justice, that our civil rights and everyone was equal under the law. in the wake of my soul, i came to understand how hollow words can feel. in the course of pursuing my own case, i ran into roadblock after roadblock and discovered my path and copies-familiarcase, .f biomedical records -- short -- and copies of medical records -- i refused to be invisible and so uncharted in nupathe. the law-- rewrote working with you. this bill is one of the few pieces of legislation passed unanimously by congress recently. though i never imagined the challenges i would face, nor did i imagine the power, progress and help that would arrive from my ordeal. today, our team has worked with local survivors to secure passages with more on the way. it is necessary for these rights to the past on a state-by-s

time but now these lobbyists have come in they've changed the constitution they've changed the bill of rights of the end run around the bill of rights i'm thinking about this whole net neutrality debate that's clearly a violation of speech is second first amendment and so you have a repudiation of the basic concepts of the founding fathers due to this cycle or corruption but is it inevitable i mean it just seems like there's nothing to stop at the moment it seems like this is how we're feeding as an empire is partly because of this and you can see how it happened back then ok so that would be chief family should they have been compensated for the first two basically market and create a lot of wealth through using double entry bookkeeping should they be penalized for that they were the first to figure it out but at a point where they've bought and you know they become very wealthy they become very close to princes and other leaders at the time they then start having so much wealth that they create great works of public art the likes of warren buffett and bill gates today they publicly very pub

of rights -- way think of the bill of rights in terms of freepeech and religious liberty, those kinds of things tied to conscience bit but the frames wrote the bill of right for criminal defendants and suspects and they deal with the investigation, prosecution, and punishment of criminals, and when corporations were first held liable for crimes at the end of the 1800s, that led them to go to court saying, we're entitled to the same constitutional rights that protect criminal suspects and criminal defendants. and indeed won some of those cases and corporations have trying be freeman from unreasonable searches and seizure and a right to counsel and do have various constitutional protections from criminal prosecution. so, i thinkure opinion is a very good one. >> so far, adam, corporations don't have a fifth amendment right against self-incrimination, this touches on howard's question to you. so are fashion right -- >> i talk about in the talk, that was the self-incriminal nation case bought by the tobacco companies against teddy roosevelt's prosec

so some people oppose the bill of rights -- opposed the bill of rights and said we don't need this because it's so obvious that no one in their right mind would ever argue that an american citizen or someone apprehended or accused of a crime in the united states would be held without limit, would be sent to a camp in another country and held forever without a trial. none of our founding fathers ever imagined that could happen. and yet, here we are. here we are at a time where just four or five years ago, this body passed a bill that says an forever. citizen can be detained that an american citizen accused of a crime in the united states could be sent to a foreign camp and held forever without trial. when you mention this to people, people are incredulous. they're like who is the person that would object to the bill of rights? who is is it that -- who is it that possibly objects to the fifth and sixth amendment. you will hearrom that perso shortly, because it is one person in the u.s. senate that objects to the fifth and the sixth amendment applying to those who are accused of a crime in ou

winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. that. the sun came up. a little bit under the just a little bit i think if you took the knob. a little bit of the. course don't. own the euro although. that's not the lifeguard at all clear. that. the leak. was. then and i can join don't jerk it. done and go soon. came out i was so similar redoes. because it is ok to be done and i can deliver them to the commanding can do is to make us all we don't have those all in that are equal boarded jones it's also means what you could just make i. guess what though we'd. go. would be minnows he has to. uncooked is a silly guess a telephone pole. who knows all. ok. so phil when i saw. the counting down one hundred i don't. know you personally wouldn't tell mentioned on that overthrows welcome major because in. the in your the night i tidy. little guy di nicole. smith got to say got to draw on a minute of talent there to make them. late to. the to. cut would be like oh shit don't eat out in the dark i didn't

time but now these lobbyists have come in they've changed the constitution they've changed the bill of rights of the end run around the bill of rights i'm thinking about this whole net neutrality debate that's clearly a violation of speech is second the first amendment and so you have a repudiation of the basic concepts of the founding fathers due to this cycle or corruption but is it inevitable i mean it just seems like there's another going to stop at the moment it seems like this is how we're feeding as an empire is partly because of this and you can see how it happened back then ok so that would be chief family should they have been compensated for the first two basically market and create a lot of wealth through using double entry bookkeeping should they be penalized for that they were the first to figure it out but at a point where they've bought and you know they become very wealthy they become very close to princes and other leaders at the time they then start having so much wealth that they create great works of public art the likes of warren buffett and bill gates today they publicl

someone whose number 1 focus will be faithful to the constitution and bill of rights and defending the first amendment, defending free speech, the second amendment, the tenth amendment. all of our basic liberties. in terms of timing, the president will come forth with a nomination quickly. i would anticipate in the next couple weeks. the senate will take up and we will confirm this nominee before the election in november. i expect we'll have confirmation hearings in all likelihood in september, october of this year. confirm a strong constitutionalist to the court. >> dana: it's probably a good thing that senator mitch mcconnell said everybody will have to work in august anyway. will have to do some double duty. let me ask you about the possibility of what issues you think are the most important going forward. judge napolitano mapped them out for them. there's big issues in front of the court. technology has changed. the government is way behind. what are the big ones that you want to see settled under a conservative court? >> there's issues across the spectrum. nothing matters more tha

it's in the bill of rights. over two-thirds of the senate voted for it, enough to pass a constitutional amendment voted for it, and one person is denying a vote on this. the senior senator from south carolinaoes not believe thebi oe accused of a crime. think about that. this is not about me. this is abone senator from south carolina who souch objects to the bill of rights that he doesn't want it to apply to people accused of a crime. so yes, i do most strenuously object. mr. inhofe: mr. president. the presiding officer: the senator from oklahoma. mr. inhofe: mr. president, i do regret again -- let me repeat what was just objected to. it is ten amendments cleared on both sides. democrats are all for them, republicans are all for them. i suggest the senator, junior senator from kentucky is for all of these amendments, too. if we don't have any of these amendments, then what amendments will we have? and what good does it do to offer an objection to these amendments that have -- that are all germane just because he's

what is striking to me about 1968 and about this campaign is how meaningful the economic bill of rights that was published by the poor people's campaign is today. they published a bill of rights, and i am going to read it because i think this is the heart of why i believe that in many respects, what this ought to be about is we now must pick up the baton of the 1968 poor people's campaign, and run anew. the first bill of right was meaningful job at a living wage. the second was secure an adequate income for those who cannot find a job or do a job. access to land for economic uses. access to capital for poor people and minorities to promote their own businesses. ability for ordinary people to play a truly significant role in the government. this poor people's campaign, which was really an iteration by martin luther king to do a number of things, one, to pivot and expand to a focus on economic justice and economic rights in a very determined way. understanding that the 1964 civil rights act and the 1965 voting rights act were important tools and pillars, but that they were missing dynamic

the legacy old central bankers are the winners innovation youth dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this american this version of america i'm one we for the collapse i look forward to the end of america i give it thirty six months and then we'll see something new and that's the way it works thank god stating for the second half a lot more about what. you know world's big partners. and conspiracy it's time to wake up to be deeper to hit the stories that made stream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door on the bath shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the troops the time is now for watching closely watching the hawks.

winners the legacy old central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. that. tough. kid the. kind of. those who don't consume don't judge them doesn't do it on joyful feel in the sand on the most room in that are equal to tens of thousands of what he calls a still small thought. this will be done still in the low. to those moving in as is on this is. the sitting on. human trafficking and first world countries where we make the headlights talk watches namely because there trails can often involve the rich and. for deep institutional corruption and aptitude or both and details of crimes that may still refuse to do people were still refused to believe take place in our quote unquote civilized societies thankfully there are journalists and authors out there not afraid to report and discuss the trafficking industry in all worlds and one of those. who is also the executive director of alliance to rescue victims of trafficking she sat down recently with our own john stone to discuss the issues of human trafficking and some

eastern >> american history tv, constitutional scholar linda explains the bill of rights, detailing each of the 10 amendments and how they were ratified. she also describes how these rights are used by citizens and determined by the supreme court. -- the smithsonian associates hosted this event. to welcome back linda monk, a graduate of harvard law school, who twice received the

winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers this is of. course. the. kinda. commanding he. does she don't consume don't jell you been talking to was only joking the only thing i'm done assume that equal one to two inches was underway equals a stance me back going on in condolence this will be done soon i'm doing. that to those on putting in a song is a downside acid all the sitting on. the sun was. the part. i. would not. be. headlining this hour donald trump and kim jong un are in singapore for that highly anticipated u.s. north korea summit which is hopeful kept the recent spike in tension and i'm seventy on the korean peninsula. but not for trading for across the globe ready for the free for world cup so maybe i let's continue to push stereotypes about those infamous russian football or the goods like to australian filmmakers came here to find those folks you see on t.v. . tonight i believe we go there in oakland they're on the fence so you really. feel. like you're. in a stadium full of organs we got. t

the first is a resolution in support of assembly bill -- member ting's bill, the domestic worker rights implementation act, ab 2314. i first want to thank my cosponsors, supervisors fewer, yee, peskin, and safai. this bill is the follow up to the california domestic worker bill of rights which finally became law in 2016. this law, which i had the honor of helping to draft during my time as a low wage worker requires home care and child care employers to provide certain basic rights to domestic workers, including over time pay. assembly member particular's bill seeks to provide resources to the california department of labor standards and enforcement to implement the rights of domestic workers who are primarily immigrant women of color and have historically been excluded from basic labor protections. this bill is long overdue and will provide much needed resources, education and training for california's workers and employers. the resolution will put us on record as supporting this important state bill which will have a meaningful fwainancial impact on the lives of over 30,000 domestic w

before it was proposed to the states for enactment, the bill of rights was not part of the original constitution, it wasn't adopted until 1791. and the constitution was in 1789. but the right to keep and bear arms was not controversial. but it was controversial as to what the power of the states and the federal government would have over a militia. and the so-called anti-federalists wanted to have a provision that is the converse didn't promote and maintain a militia, then the states could do that. and that was not put in the second amendment, but what was simply a political not aple, and admonition, substantive right, and the militias-- that the think a free state has. there you have it, when the collective rights of the second amendment was invented in the 1960's, that doctrine was invented so you could justify any kind of gun control scheme, any kind of prohibition. in other words, we are talking about denying that there is any individual right. then you don't have to worry that the second amendment been being an amendment obstacle to any gun legislation that you want to pass. wh

it's very tough on the agenda of thways and means committee, finance committee that we have other tax bills and send taxpayer bill of rights. by the way, you do this a little bit at a time. so i think we have been taxpayer bill of rights provisions in the tax bill we passed before christmas. >> in terms of overreach by agencies, cover should make more robust usage. >> absolutely. and we are. prior to this administration they may be attempted two or three other times. and so, it has been successfully think 16 times this year. i think the better thing would be if the acronym -- i can't think of it. here's how it works. i just can't think of the name of the bill. anyway, we need to write legislation so that any major role in the major role at the deli is anything that cost the economy more than $100 million a year. we need to pass this and we would have to pass it going into effect. congress might not have expertise to make decisions than you do leave a lot to the bureaucracy like they say on scientific or health issues or something like that. then we can look at it when it comes back. when we are chastised by her constituent

very house, but top on the agenda of the ways and means committee and finance committee, and if we get other tax bills, we will probably include some taxpayer bill of rights provisions, and by the way, you know, you do this a little bit at a time. so i think we had some taxpayer bill of rights provisions in the tax bill we passed before christmas. of overreaching the agencies, do you think congress should make more robust usage of the -- sen. grassley: absolutely, and we are now. prior to this administration, it was only used once. it may have been attempted to her three other times, but never successfully. it has been successful i think 16 times this year. i think a better thing would be if the acronym -- i cannot think of it. here's how it works. i just can't think of the name of the bill. anyway, we need to write legislation so that any major rule, and a major rule evidently is anything that costs the economy more than $100 million a year. pass this, so any were like that would have to be submitted to congress, and we would have to pass it for it to go into effect. this would be particularly very helpful particularly where congress might not have exper

he basically said in his testimony you should take the bill of rights and apply it to as well.izenship that you would have those rights as a state citizen. sorry. >> one of the most unacknowledged things without abraham lincoln, it was the union veteran black-and-white. they were a tremendous political force. in terms of what happened with that, i think it was a very important component in relation to that. prof. burton: you are abso right. they used the martyred lincoln a way to do it. literally, lincoln on good friday was not unnoticed by everyone. it was almost a religious -- they pick that up for the 14th and 15th amendment. father abraham or this christlike figure has died for these rights. they actually got on the ground and make that happen. it is an important component. and new jersey rescinded the ratification of the 14th amendment. it is interesting when they klan headed second rise to power in the early 20th century both new jersey and oregon had significant rise of the power in relation to that. prof. burton: the klan is reignited pretty much by the movie "birth of a nation

she talked about now the bill of rights is being used differently, isn't it? she said the first amendment has w been weaponized to use against regular working people. and that's what happened in the janus decision. there is more of this to come. we can see this. this is what brings us together this morning. and i'm congressman cartwright and i represent northeast pennsylvania where labor rights are time honored and traditional values. it is in northeastern pennsylvania that john mitchell gathered and clarence darrow helped to establish the fair labor standards act, 40-hour work week, weekends, getting children out of the mines, we understand the importance of labor rights in northeastern pennsylvania and i'm proud to be here. what we are doing here is announcing and i'm announcing introduction in the house by the public service freedom to negotiate act, this is a bill that strengthens the rights of public employees to stand together as one and negotiate with their employer. it protects the rights of employees collectively to bargain for decent pay and fair work

the ways and means committee and the finance committee and it will probably include taxpayer bill of rights and provisions in it and by the way, you do this a little bit at a time so i think we had some taxpayer bill of rights provisions in the taxpayer before christmas. >> in terms of vocational overreaching congress should be more robust usage of the [inaudible] >> absolutely. and, we are. prior to this administration it has only been used once and maybe attended two or three other times with my that have never been successful. it is been successful 50 times this year but i think a better thing would be if the acronym does i can't think, here's how it works. i just can't think of the name. we need to write legislation so that any major role in the major role evidently is anything because the economy more than $1 million a year but we need to pass this so any rural like that would have to be cemented to congress and we would have to pass it for going to effect. this would be particularly very helpful particularly where congress may not have expertise to make final decisions and you do leav

winners the legacy old central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. that. tough. enough kids in the. need. to. read those who don't consume don't judge them interchangeably don't j. feel him for saying i'm done for some in that equal distance isn't into what he calls a stance make that connection don't want those who don't pretend to know him to. move it back to those on putting the onus is on the suit outside us at all to tell sitting on. the phone no. one was the last time. if you went on the internet knowing not using these village is it safe to say. are you sure there is no researchers over at all going to be sure the baby doesn't close to his source but. we're the only source. is part of the good deal. that was worked out of this. previously yes they are being formed in a very astute member of the society. hello welcome to sophie and cohen sophie shevardnadze and this simple favor is coming to russia and they take us to the china when it's just a few days away this russia world cup will see news acknowledges

winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. getting phone no i don't know what was the last time that you went on the internet no i'm not using me these village is it safe to do so. are you sure there's new music ters there that are all going to be sure the baby does it plus or his has been. going to say we're doing in only four. years of death as part of that was a good. bit more work i was. previously yes' and no they are being false form of where he was with a member of the society to. let them. know. donald trump and kim jong un are in singapore for that highly anticipated u.s. north korea summit which could bring the escalation to the koreans. mentioned after months of the ongoing tension and uncertainty the truck is out this morning and head to crowds gathering as you'd expect from the opening of a free for world cup fans first off in moscow three days now before but kicks off fully here in russia. under nine year old girl is placed in rehab for her addiction to an online game for a p

. >> one of the greatest things about our country is the bill of rights. you know, when we passed the constitution, many people were fearfult

winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. i'm peter lavelle i'm host of parties political discussion program cross talk me obree interesting. so here to discuss this issue of trust let me go to fairly pure if i'm a businessman so i will give a business point of view it's clear there is no business with no trust forest what is important in this is there is unions there is e.u. there's those or asian economic russian economic union for us we won't more integration be the european businessman more integration with these two unions why and way i don't and he said but china. i will tell you is very very. seventy percent in in russia seventy percent install quite more or less in his origin he can make you can see the diversion of the free and direct investment europeans. that's all ten percent american and the rest. and china is of the. income of investment it's not a lot because we produce is it means there are european companies produce produce in russia produce in kazakhstan pretty things th

winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation is dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. i've been fighting the numbers mean from this matter to us is over one trillion dollars. and. more than ten dollars each day. eighty five percent of you loans to the rich eight point six percent markets thirty percent. some with one hundred to five hundred three per circuit. and bitcoin rose to twenty thousand dollars. china is building two point one billion dollars. but don't let the numbers overwhelm. the only numbers you need to remember is one one doesn't show you can't afford to miss the one and only. follow we here in st petersburg attending the annual st petersburg international economic forum for our topic is from the atlantic to the pacific we all know the world is changing we talk about what these changes can who's behind. to shake hands in singapore at the first ever meeting between a u.s. president and a north korean leader. we will surely have. a little . more than six hundred migrants are stranded off the coast of italy after the cou

winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. elliston is getting international recognition with the help of israel at least in the world of zoos in middle for little sticks misted to do it living like a million little pieces and my complicity is going up the study hall maybe. john go into a telescope with a ship the only palestinians who gets the most help from its jerusalem counterparts i don't think there's some of those who in the world under the oak vision know only computers. and the earth is all of us not just the heart of this lady of the messiah which god. a digital t.v. in the doesn't do more. result. making history with a handshake the leaders of the u.s. and north korea meet the first time just months after threatening to obliterate each other's countries. there's some it ends with kim jong un committing to complete denuclearization in exchange for security guarantees from donald trump but some are already questioning how serious the u.s. president is about sticking to his side of

examining that in the bill of rights act of 2016. president obama signed the bill in october and witnesses also included rape victim who helped offer the act. in the deputy director of the national institute of justice. this is an hour and 35 minutes. welcome everybody. thank you for joining us at a very important hearing. this morning our committee will focus on an issue of in norma's importance

right after. as a matter fact if you go back to the origins of the 2nd amendment the debate in congress or the bill of rights before was proposed to the states for enactment the bill of rights was not part of the regional constitution. it was not adopted until 1791 and the constitution was in 1789. the right to keep and bear arms was not controversial but it was controversial as to what power the states and the federal government would have over militia and the so-called anti-federalists wanted to have a provision that if the congress didn't promote and maintain a militia that the states could do that and that was not put in the 2nd amendment but what was put in was simply political principle, kind of an admonition without being a substandard right where militia is a free - so there you have it. when the 2nd amendment rights was started in 1950s the doctrine was submitted say could just buy any gun control scheme or any kind of prohibition. in other words we are talking about denying if there's any kind of individual right. you don't have to worry about the 2nd amendment being an obstacle to gun co

winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. donald trump and kim jong un are in singapore for and historic summit it will be the first ever meeting between a u.s. president and a north korean leader. as teams from around the world a rival for the fifo world cup some news outlets continue to push stereotypes about russian football to australian filmmakers. in here to find someone who can. get. all the good there are no put in there all the time. and a nine year old girl goes into rehab for her addiction to an online game after her parents found a distressing changes in her behavior a former hacker and psychologist tackle the issue. is a part of our culture and i think computer games have been around for a long long time on our children are losing a little bit of the site as to what's real and what's maybe virtual. or broadcasting live direct from our studios in moscow this is r.t. international john thomas certainly glad to have you with us now in one hour from now the leaders of the u.s. an

winners the legacy old central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. cut. cut. cut. good. night. sleep anything it'll. be those who don't consume don't tell you that it doesn't do it on joking dealing with this thing i'm done forcing in that are equal in its own systems under what he calls a stance make that connection don't cause i don't believe then suddenly i'm the old mule they've got to those. this is a. welcome back for the top diplomat and internationally one of india's most prominent politicians schieffer or has been in the news over charges surrounding the death of his wife the full statement from his lawyers can be found on our website but we can't talk to him about an ongoing court case the former united nations under-secretary general however can talk about his new book why i am a hindu and he joins me now as he thanks for coming back on the great american great american right it will be del said the whole decline of the west can be attributed to the failure of pantheism or the loss of pantheism but you

also very careless about the bill of rights. i just came from the senate floor where he's objecting having the fifth amount and the sixth amendment apply to people accused of crimes in the united states. i hard to believe that there's a senator in public on the senate floor saying if your accused of a crime and lindsey graham calls you an enemy combatant, he can send you to guantanamo bay, no la no trial. if lindsey graham thinks you're an enemy comban somehow we'll be under martial law, that scares me to death. scares everybody that believes in the bill of rights. we're having that fight because he blocking my amendment that would say no one accused of a crime in our country should be spirited away to another country and not get a trial. >> neil: i'll belabor this one more time. i want to have lindsey graham on but he refuses coming object this show. that's fine. the one thing i want to do, get your take on his two extreme views here. there's either peace orwar. there's no middle ground. what do you think of that? >> that's typi

winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. the. more the more from out of the congo the kids think i'm goofing on the oil tonight nobody will even know who company can. it's not. going to. get. on the list that i didn't get showed up to move this because i'm on the sentencing nicholson of it in so much to the left. so i thought there's not so much but they will suffice as it is a constant basis with us you know i'm a it's. you know world a big part of the movie lot and conspiracy it's time to wake up to dig deeper to hit the stories that mainstream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door on the bath and shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now for watching closely watching the hawks. what politicians do something. they put themselves on the line they did accept the reject. so when you want to be president injured. or somehow want to. have to go on to be press

the privacy bill of rights is a term.nd we need to make it real in ways that are enforceable and really protective of consumers without unintended consequences. so i look forward to continuing this work and to making sure that we do protect the values of our society in all these ways. thanks, mr. chairman. >> thank you very much. senator cortez, anything you'd like to -- ok. first of all, let me do my usual practice of asking any and all of the witnesses if they have anything they would like to add to today's testimony, to correct to respond or anything that you felt like you didn't have an opportunity to address at the own the hearing? anyone want to add for the record? there's still time. >> just to your earlier question of is facebook different? i think as i mentioned in my written testimony, in addition to the kind of the privacy invasions that people experience on facebook and around cambridge analytica. one of the outcomes of facebook and facebook-like service is it's driven the entire industry to an awe thent kated

winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. making history with a shake of the leaders of the us sun north korea meets for the first time just months after threatening to obliterate each other's countries there are some it ends with kim jong un committing to complete denuclearize ation in exchange for a security guard in teens from donald trump but some are already questioning how serious the u.s. president is about sticking to his side of the deal. or not readers are going to think we're not reducing very little bit early for that we have. get things moving the sanctions will remain in effect we will be stopping the work is going to last until we see the the future negotiation is not going along like it should. two days. finishing touches are being made to head of the world cup in russia in part to offer a championship special guest united manager. predicts the countries he thinks will make it through to the semi final. crisis is over a migrant policy in germany he sees go go head to head

we will go live to a senate judiciary committee hearing on a survivors bill of rights for survivors of sexual assault and rape. we join it in progress.

winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rightsthese are the losers in this america.

winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation you dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers in this america. back facebook seems to be running out of options and it's a long battle with fake news the company's gone from human fact checkers to an automated system now back to hiring real people again his artist on a quarter in the never ending crusade against fake news facebook has come full circle it's now hiring so-called news credibility specialists to presumably look through and determine the fake from the truth seeking individuals with a passion for journalism who believe in facebook's mission of making the world more connected as a member of the team you'll be toast with developing a deep expert c s in facebook's new. credibility program after media outlets picked up on facebook's new position the social media giant took down that ad re uploading it with a few tweaks and a new title news publisher specialist yeah that raises less questions but wait a second a person deciding what info you should get on social media haven't we seen that before this is

that at grave risk to ourselves and personally i have no pride of ownership or authorship in any bill of rights to protect privacy. the privacy bill of rights is a realand we need to make it in ways that are forcible and protective of consumers without unintended consequences. i look forward to continuing thatwork and making sure we do protect the values of our society jerry moran: very much. senator cortez, anything you'd like to -- ok. first of all, let me do my usual practice of asking any and all of the witnesses if they have anything to add to the testimony. ashkan soltani: is facebook different? i think as i mentioned in my written testimony, in addition to the kind of the privacy invasions that people experience on facebook, it is driven the entire industry to an authenticated-based profiling and advertising your it prior to , they knewa lot of your browser and how it is sufficient to target your -- two. with the growth of face companies like google and others push to have real name base profile and identification and the trend has grown. i want to highlight, has this pressure for face t