in response to your questions, someone who was quoted earlier by the chairman, secretary bill perry when he was secretary of defense advised we should deal with north korea as if it is, not as we would wish it to be. regardless who is in power, who is the president, we have to deal with north korea on the basis of what it does, not what we think would be a likely alternative. >> the united nations draft resolution expanding multilateral sanctions, i recognize you are probably able to share very little of that because it is an ongoing discussion but i am interested in what specific mechanisms will be used to enforce new and existing sanctions. i raised this concern because the un security council resolution which passed in 2006 appeared to be a strong multilateral tool that banned atomic explosions and long-range missile launches, imposed limited financial sanctions. but the measures have been widely ignored, rendering the multilateral effort to flow. what steps are we taking to ensure this resolution does not have the same fate? >> one of the things that would be provided by this new res

your very good questions is to quote someone quote earlier by the chairman, and that is secretary bill perry when he was the secretary of defense who advised we should deal with north korea as it is and not as we would wish it to be so regardless of who is in power of north korea and who is the president and who as the leader i feel we have to deal with north korea on the basis of what it does and small but we think would be a likely alternative. >> i understand the united nations resolution has been agreed to that would expand and toughen the multilateral sanctions toward north korea and i recognize you're probably able to share very little of that because it is an ongoing discussion but i am interested to hear what specific mechanisms exist or will be used to enforce new and existing sanctions and by raising this because u.n. security council resolution 1718 which passed an 2006 appeared to be a strong multilateral toole and band atomic explosions and long-range missile launches and imposed a limited financial sanctions as well and partial trade arms. however as you well know the measures

good questions is to, quote someone who was quoted earlier by the chairman, and that is secretary bill perry when he was secretary of defend who, advised that we should deal with north korea as it is, not as we would wish it to be. . to share very little of that because it is an ongoing discussion but i am interested to hear what specific mechanisms exist or will be used to enforce new and existing sanctions and by raising this because u.n. security council resolution 1718 which passed an 2006 appeared to be a strong multilateral toole and band atomic explosions and long-range missile launches and imposed a limited financial sanctions as well and partial trade arms. however as you well know the measures have been widely ignored and on and forced and thereby basically rendering a multilateral effort to toothless. what steps are we taking to ensure this new resolution if it passes doesn't have the same fate? >> one of the things that would be provided by this resolution assuming it is adopted is the dprk sanctions committee would have an enhanced mandate to focus on compliance investigations a

many of our local leaders left office, including bill jentee, scott gifford, keith hunt, dick hyde, cindy irwin, kathryn bartlett, rita mullins, tim perry, sal and john. their longstanding service embodies what leadership is about. our mayors often serve as the voice of our local communities and is the closest contact for people on government issues. i thank them for their dealings with my office on federal issues. i've enjoyed working with each and every one of them and wish them the best of success. they assisted our office in betting serving our communities and all illinois families. i ask unanimous consent to enter into the recordhis list of past presidents and mayors. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, so ordered. ms. bean: and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman yields back. for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia rise? mr. moran: to address the house for one minute and to revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. moran: thank you, madam speaker. madam speaker, for weeks this body has been subjected to u