and neither does bill stanton.ing part about this investigation is that interview was entertaining, but it meant nothing. she failed a polygraph. at best she was inconclusive. >> we think she failed but later came out the lawyer claims the police later said she didn't actually fail, that was a tactic. we don't know what the truth is. >> the truth is let's go with deborah bradley. she said she failed. she was confronted. she will not allow herself a one-on-one conversation with the detectives in an interrogation room setting. that being said she allows somebody that's a private citizen that worked for the cia to come in and ask her softball questions, larry king questions and obviously she's going to be able to answer those questions. she's had time to prepare for them. and she's had people and she's had people preparing -- preparing -- why would they allow her to sit down with this man if they thought that there was going to be any way that she would actually be found to be deceptive? and what would it mean? >> wha

they don't have anything neither does bill stanton.of this investigation is that interview was entertaining but it meant nothing. she failed a polygraph. >> well -- >> she was inconclusive at best. >> we think she was fooled but then they told the lawyer the police told them she p didn't actually fail that was a tactic. we don't know what the truth is. >> the truth is let's go with deborah bradley. she said she failed. she was confronted she will not allow herself a one-on one conversation with the detectives in an interrogation room setting. that being said, she allows somebody that is a private citizen that worked for the cia to come in and ask her softball questions. larry king questions. of course she is going to be able to answer those questions. she is had time to prepare for them and she is had people preparing. why would they allow her to sit down with this man if they thought tlvz going to be anyway she was going to be deceptive and what did it mean? it would mean nothing. >> twha do you think is the most compelling piece of e

>> you know, when i was covering this case, i would speak with bill -- bill stanton is the private investigatorn the middle of the night. it's usually the parents. 99% of the time. and he you wily became convinced that the parents did not do it. and i talked to him and he convinced me too. then i would talk to furman who devoted a lifetime and he convinces me the other way. so i honestly can say i don't know the answer. but i'll tell you this, i think there is a better than fighting chance that that child was taken out of her crib as she slept at 11 months old and there is some eyewitness testimony to support it, by more than one person in the neighborhood. and the cops zeroed in on this family, which is -- that's what they do. there is nothing wrong with the cops doing that because like i say, usually the way it is. but there is a question about whether some of the other main leads for the case has been investigated. if there is a chance this little girl is out there with somebody who has no right to her, who god forbid isn't looking out for her, then the country should be aware of that and we