that according to experts like mateus think binah is exactly where the problem lies. lisa, tight coke with this pressure and pushed to achieve such an ambitious goal so quickly can sometimes mean that the right measures are not implemented. in reality, yes, of the whole i prefer someone who says i am going to reduce emissions gradually. well, to attempt to become climate neutral by 2050 than someone who says that they will be climate neutral by 2030. but who has no idea how by just by c o 2 certificates consul t f. it was the construct of to say, i have these remaining emissions and i have quantified them these and this is why i cannot reduce these emissions yet. oh my is amazon or that makes things transparent from pennsburg and then you could say we're trying to reach climate neutrality by this data, but we can only guarantee a 95 percent reduction by then for more full transparency as constructive, fuller transport. it sounds less ambitious and public any, but it would be significantly better. have you ever brought it before? climate neutrality is a key term in int