group, it’s probably associated with some kind of games, fantasies, maybe with lastelin of the rings, biowulfhis, and it seems that this is unexpected, yes, but if you know you well, you are a candidate of philological sciences, a linguist in general, the worlds borhis, they contain... in general all possible plots and please tell us what you have in common with this writer, why do you love him? i’ll tell you, yes, i’ll tell you why i chose this particular writer for our meeting, you know, if i had chosen some kind of scandinavian studies or celtic studies, i would speak here as a professional in this topic, i would include a lecturer like natalya andreevna, professor at the pulpit, now we 'll talk about registers in irish sagas, blah blah blah, well, probably not very good interesting for a podcast about literature, so i decided that i probably want to be in this case not a specialist, not a teacher, but a professional reader, that is, this is what i personally am interested in reading, what? makes me happy as a reader in literature, especially since, as you quite rightly noted, i am not a l

eh, with some fantasy games, maybe with the lord of the rings, biowulf, irish sagas, then suddenly youthe theme of borhis and it seems that this is unexpected. yes, but if you know you well, you are a candidate of psychological sciences, a linguist and, in general , the worlds of borhis. they contain everything possible plots and please tell us what you have in common with this writer. why do you love him? i'll tell you, yes, i'll tell you why. i chose this particular writer for our meeting, you see. if i had chosen some kind of scandinavian studies or celtic studies, i would have spoken here as a professional on this topic. i would include a lecturer like natalya andreevna, a professor at the department. and now we ’ll talk about registers, irish sagas, blah blah blah. well, this is probably not very interesting for podcast literature. so i i decided that i probably wanted to stay. in this case, not a specialist, not a teacher, but a professional reader. that is, this is what i personally find interesting to read, what makes me happy, like readers in literature, especially since i som

it ’s probably still associated with some kind of... fantasies, maybe with lastelin of the rings, biowulf medical systems of all kinds, i say, hello, i’m natasha, i’m a professional patient, today i want to be a professional reader, but borhis himself was a professional reader, he somehow emphasizes this, in his essays, that his main role is reader, this is exactly what is close to me, because until the end of his life he is absolutely in love with the process of reading, this is very visible, even in those essays that he read when he was already completely blind, it is very clear how occupied he is in general in principle, the very creation of the text is the relationship text and language, since borhis was a polyglot, he is terribly interested in precisely this babylonian confusion of languages, which can be ordered in the notorious hexagons of the babylonian library, somehow organized or disorganized, remember, he has a wonderful moment in one of the short stories, he remembers when the boys, when the books were closed for the night, he thought that the letters in them were scattered a