and by the way, before the ceremony of photographing the leaders of the state bkb vladimir putin what is called on the legs briefly spoke to his colleague from kazakhstan the fact is that i arrived here in yerevan in a generally new status for myself, only last sunday , early presidential elections were held in the republic, uh, in which more than 80% of the country's inhabitants voted for such a person, more precisely 80% of all who came to the polls and soon have such an inauguration. what exactly were the leaders talking about? uh, until uh, photo, m-m correspondents set up. uh, the press did not hear his technique, but during his speech at the council in a narrow format, and vladimir putin congratulated his colleague from kazakhstan quote on a convincing victory. well, in general, the meeting in yerevan is taking place against the backdrop of growing threats from the strange, west, and the participants in today's meetings spoke in detail about support for ukraine, for example, from the north atlantic alliance, it leads to an escalation of this conflict, but, and the eastern flank

we are waiting for the heads of state of the bkb all the details natalia yes boris thank you.e are waiting with you. sergey lavrov’s visit to yerevan, and not only our special correspondent borisova ivanovna told . it is known that another large trading platform, genesis, is also experiencing liquidity difficulties and may close at any time, bloomberg writes, citing his sources. alena logvinova knows how the holders of crypto wallets react to this news bitcoin continues to sag, reaching a two-year low. the cost of the cryptocurrency fell below $15,500 and according to all forecasts, the trend will continue the general decline of the market, for a year more than $400 million trillion, the trigger for the decline was the collapse of ftx, one of the world's largest crypto platforms, which declared bankruptcy on november 11, then reports of the loss of six hundred and sixty million dollars by customers, the exchange could not do without the interference of competitors on the trading floor, the company was going to buy the buy-in in tx however, in the last immediately refused the d

if russia wins, and the bkb will live., the dkb will not win, and our countries will also have many sorrows. whose heads began to discuss this problem, i feel that we have come to a consensus that, if god forbid , russia collapses, then under these rubble of our area. therefore, we not only owe each other to protect, but to understand, as we always said in russia in ordinary times, russia is its main role. so there should not even be such conversations, we are not going to leave our political arena, so the akb will exist and no one will collapse anywhere, but only. we need to sign a package of documents following the results of the yerevan summit, which will help countries interact better. the secretary general of the organization, stanislav zasya, will replace the imangalit from the magambets, and the outgoing secretary from kazakhstan was awarded, but the next meeting of the military-political bloc, while they are planning for the fall, what next time leaders and dcs are expected in belarus yerevan has passed the baton a

his bkb rotation as secretary general of the organization stanislav zas will replace the imangolite fromnd the outgoing secretary from kazakhstan was awarded, but the next meeting at the political bloc is scheduled for autumn, so next time the leaders of the csto are expected in belarus yerevan passed the baton and already minsk will accept the organizations themselves on the rights of presiding countries. it's good if life doesn't raise questions before the accident that will need to be discussed earlier i want to believe in it, as always believe in the best natalya shaved alexander olezhka agency or news? yerevan armenia belarus , being a strong outpost at the western border of the dkb , plays an exemplary role in ensuring collective security, as well as maintaining peace and stability in the area of ​​responsibility of the organization, a russian political scientist shared this opinion. vladimir kireev, according to the expert, active participation in resolving the kazakhstani crisis and a clear position on the nagorno-karabakh problem confirm the confident course of the republic of b

well, there, usually, the topic implied that some state invaded the territory of some state from the bkbthere was a slightly different internal conflict, but nevertheless , the issues of introducing a grouping were worked out. and then the question of immediately withdrawing it from there is being worked out, and not just arriving and staying there at the end to the end always with questions of such a grouping to one or another territory the questions are worked out immediately, the order is planned, so we had various kinds of exercises and are now going through the exercises. they all have very different themes, depending on which state on the territory there they all gather and, therefore, hone their bodies for the situation. here, uh, what is more emphasis on protection, of course, of course, always the question is to protect the territorial value, either of one's state, or the state, than it is, as it were, the protection and liberation of the territory within the boundaries that they are. no further development events are not needed, only 30 years of phyto their territorial resource

president spoke about communication, yes, and information, but let’s say a new one, so the function of the bkb but also this basis for it is the russian language, yes, which unites us all and meetings. it comes in russian of the same tkb, but we hush up, and it’s very in vain that in many countries there is a cch among young people, there are 15-22 years old. you are more likely to find someone who speaks understand english than a lot of work has been done. this result finds alexandrovna says i will not name when they say, when when it comes about the fact that they want to slam these integration processes there in general on television. i know for some reason it was done, because a representative of the american british embassy came to us and offered to collapse these projects. i am responsible for my words, therefore colleagues. well , firstly, there are no organizations that have not gone through different stages of their development, including problems, and there were problems in nato and there is a contradiction, and accordingly , the uk recently left the european union and other countrie

there, usually, the theme implied that some kind of state invaded the territory some state from the bkbe. here there was a slightly different internal conflict, but nevertheless, the issues of introducing a grouping were worked out. and immediately the issue of immediately withdrawing it from there is being worked out, and not just arriving and staying there until the end , always with questions of such a grouping in one territory or another, questions are being worked out right away , the order is planned, so we had various kinds and are now going through exercises . they all have very different themes depending on moreover, on the territory of which state there all e, gather and so they hone certain situations. here, uh, what is more emphasis on protection, of course, of course, always the question is to protect the territorial value, either of one's state, or the state, than it is, as it were, the protection and liberation of the territory within the boundaries of which they are, no further development of events is needed, then their territorial . they have our resources pumped us th

fate of the csto depends on the operation of the russian federation in ukraine if russia wins, and the bkblive. if, god forbid, the csto does not win, there will be no existence. and in our countries, too, many hotheads began to discuss this problem. i feel that we have come to a consensus. that if , god forbid, russia collapses, then under these rubble of our area therefore, we must not only protect each other, but understand, as we always said in russia in normal times, russia is its main role. so there shouldn't even be conversations. we are not going to leave all the military political arena, so the akb will exist and no one will collapse anywhere, but the only thing we need is belarus to worry about the monolith about the dkb, but you can’t look at the military-political blog in isolation from global events nato is sharpening knives at our borders and the alliance builds up power and finally consolidated the anti-russian anti-belarusian vectors. this is their rainbow picture of the world, where they are talking more and more often, and declaring their readiness to deploy nuclear weapo

if russia wins, the bkb will live. if god forbid, will not win will not exist . to them, our countries, too, many hotheads began to discuss this problem, i feel that we have come to a consensus. what if god forbid if russia collapses, then under these rubble is our place . therefore, we must not only protect each other, but understand, as we always said in russia in normal times, russia is its main role. so there should not even be such conversations, we are not going to leave our political arena. here, as if it will exist and no one will collapse anywhere, but the only thing we need is, as they say, they want to go their own way, on their own external course, it turns out to be strong the belarusian position nuclear blackmail should not have a place in international politics, the presidency passed to belarus immediately after they themselves took courses there in yerevan to increase the effectiveness of the csto. the west presses through the history of the course to dismantle the memory should the baltic authorities in estonia plan to demolish 244 soviet monumen

fate of utkb depends on the operation of the russian federation in ukraine if russia wins, and the bkb will live. if god forbid, he doesn’t win, the design bureau will not exist. him our countries too many hotheads have started to discuss this issue feel that we have come to a consensus. that if, god forbid, russia collapses, then under these rubble is our place. therefore, we must not only protect each other, but understand, as we always used to say in russia, russia is its main role. so there should not even be such conversations. we are not going from the military political arena. leaving will exist and no one will collapse anywhere, but only. we need that want to walk our own path on our own external course, it turns out, strong pressing is increasingly talking about the possibility of using nuclear weapons, a firm belarusian position nuclear blackmail should not have a place in international politics, the presidency of belarus passed immediately after the courses themselves in yerevan were taken to improve the efficiency of recreation of the cbm. the expert community expects good