. >>: justice blackmun is in trouble again and despite being cut from the nfl.ed him over at a traffic stop and arrested him for marijuana possession. black men are ready suspended without pay and has repeated violations from the nfl policy. >>: 49 years back on the field during up with the star of the season and >>: group of tree canopy to see that they're working out of business for the 30 darters. -- forty-niners, it will start the second week of august. >>: onto baseball the a's finished up their series with the houston astros. it's a beautiful day for a ball game yesterday. check out the bottom of the six below the game bergamot stakes and the deep to right center. the 13 runs the a's now had to texas to take out the rangers. >>: they are back home to take on the dodgers today. the poll had most are even better for filling. they struck out three times in this game. philadelphia break a 101 tie that's all they need. > >: this is the couple's second child and a vigorous sixth and this is his fourth wife. how queer elizabeth got into the fall ball will show yo

you can also share anything you see on booktv.org nasally blackmun share on the upper west side of the page book tv strands live on live for 48 hours every weekend booktv.org pantages. >> book tv asks, what are you reading this summer? >> i would like to read about american history. i've just finished reading a book called once bird ohio. it is from 87 to five years ago. small-town america, happens to be my state. it really does kind of capture the small town and people's rivalries and all that. i just finished a book called five came back about five hollywood directors it during world war ii the president roosevelt asked to phone overseas actions in the war and talk to the american public about its truth, no way that really rally the country in the battle mostly against germany and japan. i am looking forward to reading a book, tin cans father-in-law who was a republican governor of virginia. his name is lynn would colton. the father of his wife and his pals and civil rights in virginia as a republican. much more supportive of civil rights than they are today. one last book, really in

the shooter was a white man reggie is and blackmun and he says he has been called the inward numerous-the "n" word many ti mes. is there any history between your mother and this man. and though she told me that shoeless visiting reggie and as she loved me and see said she did not need me to walk with tariff because she took this wall of the attack. there was a full of blood below the drive way he and his cousin came back to clean the area and see if reggie was ok as well. earlier today this man actually drew a bullet at him not shooting at them but literally threw a bullet. police are investigating an officer involved shooting that happened this sunday in vallejo. police say a suspicious man was walking down the street holding a gun near mark street. the officers found the man, who tried to escape by running up the driveway of a residence. the officers went after the man. police say the man then turned around and raised his gun. then one of the officers shot him. police say the man has an extensive criminal history, including gun related charges. the man was transported to a local hos

congressman blackmun in the house has offered legislation, senator cruz in the senate has offered legislation that would do just that. but it's not in the bill that we are being asked to provide cloture on that will come up in a few minutes. the article goes on to say, just to stress the stark nature of what is being considered, "the shift in the white house thinking came after house republicans said they wouldn't take up immigration legislatio legislation." so the president is saying that i have legislation and the house won't pass it; therefore, i'm going to do it myself. it's one of the most pathetic excuses for abuse of power by a court or a president that you can imagine. congress considered his legislation. he promoted it strongly. members on both parties have advocated for things like that. but the house considered it and rejected it. that's an action. that's a decision by the house of representatives. the president has no power to go beyond that. and i think this congress, this senate has a responsibility to speak to that question and to avoid an issue. it goes on, the "wall street jo

it a pyramid scheme, but it does say something, duane stanford, does it not, about the case that blackmunmaking -- bill ackman is making. thee have reported about illinois case. besides are credible. clearly, something happened there. it is very difficult. regulars will have to work through this, but it is difficult to figure out exactly who was told what and what happened. that eventually could be a compliance issue for herbalife. it could potentially mean they are not looking hard enough for this type of activity, assuming what happened actually happened. these are all questions that are valid and no serious person would say those are not important and valid questions that he is raising. the issue becomes does all of that, and the anecdotal evidence, rise to the level of a criminal enterprise, especially when you're looking at a definition of a pyramid scheme that is very debated. it is not a clear-cut answer. some people say it is. some people say it is not. the fact is the amount of debate that is happening, it is clear the definition is not adequate, and it is almost -- i will have t

it made me wonder -- i remember an article you did about how justice blackmun urged him to postpone the decision from a aursday to a monday because story on a friday or saturday newspaper does not get much attention in the summer. i wonder if any suspects that hobby lobby may have gotten pushed from last week to this week precisely for the style and impact that david was talking about. >> i think that theory would make more sense if they issued decisions on friday, which might get lost. but i don't think it applies to thursday decisions, which is what they typically do these days. that was good pr advice from the clerk back in the day, but i in't inc. i attribute that -- don't think i attribute that to why monday. >> gentlemen, you said something about the difference between being upstairs in the courtroom and downstairs in the press office. can you tell us about what that differences and how you make the choice? >> i am in a lucky position that i have a partner who is very fast and handles our on the spot copy. copy ofte he can get a the opinion, he runs to his terminal and types of wh

it made me wonder -- i remember an article you did about how justice blackmun urged him to postpone the decision from a thursday to a monday because a story on a friday or saturday newspaper does not get much attention in the summer. i wonder if anybody suspects that hobby lobby may have gotten pushed from last week to this week precisely for the style and impact that david was talking about. >> i think that theory would make more sense if they issued decisions on friday, which might get lost. but i don't think it applies to thursday decisions, which is what they typically do these days. that was good pr advice from the clerk back in the day, but i don't think i attribute that to why monday. >> you said something about the difference between being upstairs in the courtroom and downstairs in the press office. can you tell us about what that differences and how you make the choice? >> i am in a lucky position that i have a partner who is very fast and handles our on the spot copy. the minute he can get a copy of the opinion, he runs to his terminal and types of what happened. he has prewr

blackmun and mr. justice stewart have raised about whether the mandamus case is properly here. mr. justice, we did, in our certiorari petition, refer to the fact that we were trying to bring before the court for review before judgment in the court of appeals the order of the district court which we said the president had tried to obtain review of in two ways in two cases in the court of appeals, and we gave the docket numbers of those two cases. and, that certiorari petition was filed on may 24 and judge sirica, who was the respondent as justice stewart properly notes in the mandamus case in the court of appeals, was served with a copy of the certiorari petition as he had been served with the mandamus petition as, indeed, had all the respondents who were otherwise before the court, the defendants in united states against mitchell. on may 28 in accordance with a motion that was filed in a court of appeals, a copy of which i believe is in the files of this court, the court of appeals transmitted to this court the records in both of those cases, the appeal and the mandamus cases. now,