. >> a student originally from korea kills 32 people at virginia state university, blacksberg, virginia. >> shootings like these and many others have served a huge role in the ongoing gun debate. anti-gun organizations point out these shootings as acts of violence that occurred strictly because guns are easily accessible. paul helk is the act -- helmke is -- their message is this, we are many want "we are devote today creating an america free from gun violence." in one book it is asked, why not use ghandi's way. he did not have guns and he beat the british empire. here's another student from the same school with a different opinion entirely. >> no, i don't think the second amendment is necessary. i think back when it was created back in the bill of rights the state militias were needed to fight off the federal government if they got out of hand and also to protect themselves personally. and nowadays, there is no need for that, there are no state militias or anything. except for hunting, there is no real reason. if guns were illegal, nobody would need to protect themselves from guns. yes