the large well known blank university. what's underneath that? >> i don't know, sir. >> you wrote it and you don't know. you can't remember? >> i don't remember every email. >> this is about the lawsuit a number of christian-affiliated universities had against the government regarding their religious liberty rights, correct? that's what the subject matter of all these emails are. >> it is the definition under 6103 -- >> you can't tell me is that christian academy, catholic university, even though you wrote it? >> no, sir. >> you can't tell me what's underneath the blank, even though you wrote t. cause can't tell me who decided to redact this, but your testimony is also i did not share any confidential taxpayer information with the white house, even though 75 times you were cleared to meet and thud correspondence back and forth with all kinds of redactions, and they all say the same thing, 6103. it sure looks like someone -- e the law here, ms. inin ingram. >> i would refer the congress to the people -- >> if i could, please, will you provide us th

the large well known blank universities. what is underneath that? >> i don't know, sir. question you wrote it and you don't remember? this is the lawsuits, a number of christian universities had against the government about the latest liberty rights, isn't that right? >> it is about the definition under 6033. it is au can't come if christian university are catholic university, even though he wrote it? >> no, sir, i cannot tell you. who decided tell me to blacked this out and redacted so the committee couldn't get it , but your testimony is also i did not share any confidential taxpayer information with the highest that's what the white house. even though you are cleared semi-five times to meet with ms. lambro and all of this reduction says 6103. it sure looks like somebody here broke the law, missing rim. i referredreform -- the congressman with the team which this committee is already working with. orwe provide us the person persons who decided that this committee couldn't see this information and wrote 6103 on this e-mail? factwill take the word that the folks who are w

the large well-known blank university. what is underneil that. >> i don't know. >> rough wrote it. you don't. >> i don't remember eve e-mail issue do. >> this is about the lawsuits, number of christian affiliated universities had against the government recording their religious liberty rights, correct? that's the subject matter of these e-mails. >> about the definition under 6033 -- >> you can't tell me that's christian university, catholic university, even though you wrote it. >> i do not know what is underneath the blanks. >> you can't tell me what is underneath the blanks even though you wrote it. you can't tell me who decided to black this out and redact so it the committee couldn't get it. but your testimony is i did not share any confidential taxpayer information with the white house, even though 75 times you were cleared to meet with miss lamb bro and you had this conversation back and forth with all cynips reef dynamicses and they -- redactions and they say the same thing, 6103. it looks like someone broke the law here, miss ingram. >> i would refer to the congressman to thi

the large well-known blank universities. what is underneath that? >> i don't know sir. >> this is about the lawsuits confident number of christian affiliated institutions regarding their religious liberty lights. >> is about the definition under 6033. >> the catholic university can't tell me what's underneath that information? >> no sir i don't know what's underneath the blanks. >> you can tell me what's under the blanks and you can tell me who decided to redact this but your testimony is i did not share confidential taxpayer informatiinformati on with the white house even though 75 times you are cleared to be with her and you have the correspondence back and forthwith all kinds of reductions in all the redaction say the same thing. 6103. it sure looks like someone broke the law here ms. ingram. >> i would do for the congressman to the team with which this committee is working. >> mr. chairman if i could, we provide as the person or persons who decided this committee couldn't see this information of road 6103 on this e-mail? >> i will take the work b

students peacefully protesting constitution hikes at the university of california davis pepper sprayed at point blanklling ] >> police officer john pike was fired after eight months of paid leave. but today he's back in the news. for getting a $38,000 settlement from the university. a judge awarded workers' compensation after pike suffered from depression and anxiety after receiving death threats. but officer pike got more money than the students. 21 plaintiffs who were sprayed or arrested were to receive $30,000 each. how is this justice? this ruling sends a message to police it's okay to use pepper spray and it's okay to violate other people's rights. and that is not acceptable. but they didn't fit. customer's not happy, i'm not happy. sales go down, i'm not happy. merch comes back, i'm not happy. use ups. they make returns easy. unhappy customer becomes happy customer. then, repeat customer. easy returns, i'm happy. repeat customers, i'm happy. sales go up, i'm happy. i ordered another pair. i'm happy. (both) i'm happy. i'm happy. happy. happy. happy. happy. happy happy. i love logistics. always g