>> if you take a strictly narrow definition of central banks as you have blinkeredly done so, then, yesthe problem, ali, is that central banks today have a wider and widening remix. the fed with its 6.5% threshold on employment, widening the remit. the bank of england with its vast new supervisory powers, widening the remit. the ecb with its omt policy and with its new supervisory powers, widening the remit. the imf chief economist, the former president of the bundesbank, numerous people are now saying there's a contradiction between the widening remits and central banking dependence. politicians make those decisions, not unelected central bankers. be warned, there's a contradiction, there is a conflict and they are too powerful. >> that's an almost perfect argument if i had anybody idea what widening the remit means. but, boy, you made it really well. richard quest champion of his debating union. whenever it was that he ended up going to school. the banks that are too big to fail before the financial crisis are bigger today. but one person's too big to fail is another's buying opportun