secondly, bloody bush v. gore. but for bush v. gore, there would have been no iraq war.ry penny spent in iraq, every drop of blood of americans, our allies and on the iraqis, is on the heads of those incredibly corrupt justices that gave us that decision. host: let's let mr. zirin respond. guest: i don't know quite where to begin. i agree with you that bush v. gore was a partisan decision. it was a 5-4 decision. but later on "the new york times" recounted the vote throughout the state of florida and bush would have won the state of florida if the court had allowed the counting to continue. i don't think it would have hanged the outcome as scalia argued later if they had decided the other way. i don't think that the justices should pick the president. that's not what was intended. that's what madison wrote. i think that was an unfortunate decision for the court. as to the ethics of justice thomas, whom i have a great deal of respect for, the supreme court, unfortunately, is not bound by the cannons of judicial ethics. that's why ginsberg really didn't do anything wrong wh

and then secondly bloodied bush v gore. there would have been no iraq war. every penny spent in iraq, every drop of blood of americans and iraqis and our allies are on the head of those justices.et >> host: let's let him respond to that. >> guest: i don't know where to begin exactly, i agree that bus5 v gore was a partisan decision, but later on the new york timesr recounted the vote throughout the state of florida and bushin would have won the state of florida if they had allowed it to continue. i don't think it would have changed the outcome as scalia argued later if they had decided the other way. i don't think the justice should pick the president. that's not what was intended, i think that was an unfortunate decision of the court. as to the ethics of justice thomas whom i have a great deal of respect for, the supreme court unfortunately is not bound by the canons of judicial ethics all the other federal judges is bound to that but the supreme court is not.ade i think the activities of thomas's wife are unfortunate because they give ground to the very cr