senator bloomenthal, the president didn't talk about the repeal of the 2001 authorization, which seems to suggest that the white house thinks it already has permission, so what's the point of all this? >> that's exactly one of the key questions here. how can we leave in place the supposedly obsolete authority that is so broad and vague that maybe it makes unnecessary this authorization the president is requesting? part of what needs to be done is to repeal not only the 2002 authorization, but the 2001 authorization. >> the 2001 authorization, to be clear, was written in the wake of the september 11th attacks and is directed at those who sponsored those attacks. isis didn't exist at that point. are you surprised it wasn't in the white house proposal? >> i am in a way surprised. it is a key question that needs to be answered along with others, such as the scope and scale of the united states military involvement. there's this phrase enduring offensive operations. what is an offensive operation or a defensive operation? that point may need to be clarified. in the background here is a key