mark porter at the bma. where is the wrong? >> a national health service is indeed looking for savings within the nhs which will be reinvested. and i would remind my right honorable gentleman that it's his government providing that not just the $8 billion in funding by 10 billion requested by the national health service in sustainability plans are being developed at local levels in the interest of local people by local. >> it's very strange the prime minister should say that mr. speaker because the health select committee chaired by our honorable friend says it's actually 4.50 yen. there is quite a big difference there. mr. speaker part of the reason for the strain on our national health service is because more than 1 million people are not receiving the social care that they need. as a result of this there has been an increase in emergency admissions for older patients. it's not funny. she described how her 89-year-old mother suffered to false leading to hospital admissions due to a lack of nursing care and went on to say my m

porter of the bma. mess, isthe process a he wrong? the national health service is indeed looking for savings within the nhs which will be reinvested in the nhs. is, it is this government that is providing, not just a billion of extra funding the nhs requested, but 10 billion and a funding -- in extra funding requested and sustainability and transmission plans have been developed on the levels in the interest of local people by local commissions. >> hear! >> it is very strange the prime minister should say that, mr. speaker because the committee shared by our honorable friend says it is actually 4.5 billion, not 10 billion. that is quite a big difference. mr. speaker, part of the reason for the strain on our national health services is that more than one million people are not receiving the social care that they need. mr. corbyn: as a result of this, there has been an increase in emergency admissions for older patients. margaret wrote to me this week saying, "it is not funny," -- [crosstalk] mr. corbyn: she described how her 89-year-ol

that the bma. but today, the release of confidential medical information on public figures is controversial. there is an article recently in the journal of medicine tracing out fdr's medical recently release end attitude and again criticized the notion of people revealing things in a confidential thing about their patients. okay, what does this finally conclude? others have identified moran's correctness in hpublishing his diary, besides the historians, the topical question will a patient's confidence has been outraged by a physicians account of him both in his strength and in his weakness will no longerage state the reader. this is an article of about year ago when this historian really looked at the issue of confidentiality. and said probably when everything was done, moran publishing his diary broke the code on confidentiality with notable people. is that the last word? well, i don't think so. lady psalms herself probably should have had the last word. she commented always the gracious lady you

the bma. the upset with the release of confidential information. the journal of society of criticizing the notion of revealing things in a confidential manner. ok. what do others finally conclude? one professor political science question, the topical whether the average is the decisions -- physicians account or the weakness. this is from a year ago. ofy look at the issue confidentiality. it isll is said and done, the first one that broke the code on the issue of confidentiality. is that the last word? i don't think so. the gracious lady said she understood how he understood winston thoroughly. not only the medical considerations, but also fully aware of the implications in regards to the office he held and condition. i think churchill should have the last word. he relied heavily on board more , saying youmoran get me going for so long. and that he lived another five years. moran himself claims churchill opens his heart and felt better for his candor. it may have disturbed his family. moran's revelations opened up the possibility that churchill was

porter of the bma. mess, isthe process a he wrong?e national health service is indeed looking for savings within the nhs which will be reinvested in the nhs. is, it is this government that is providing, not just a billion of extra funding the nhs requested, but 10 billion and a funding -- in extra funding requested and sustainability and transmission plans have been developed on the levels in the interest of local people by local commissions. >> hear! >> it is very strange the prime minister should say that, mr. speaker because the committee shared by r

mark porter of the bma. when he calls this process a mess, where is he wrong? >> the national health service is indeed looking for savings within the nhs which will be reinvested in the nhs. it is -- i would remind the right honorable gentleman it is this government providing not just the $8 billion of additional funding but 10 billion of extra funding requested by the national health service and the sustainability and transformation plans are being developed at local level in the interests of local people by local commissions. >> it's very strange the prime minister should say that, mr. speaker because the health select committee chaired by the honorable member says it's 4.5 billion, not 10 billion. it's quite a big -- there's quite a big difference there. mr. speaker, part of the reason for the strain on our national health service is that more than 1 million people are not receiving the social care that they need. as a result of this, there's been an increase in emergency admissions for older patients. margaret wrote to me this week saying -- it's not funny.

mark porter of the bma. when he calls this process a mess, where is he wrong? >> the national health service is indeed looking for savings within the nhs which will be reinvested in the nhs. it is -- i would remind the right honorable gentleman it is this government providing not just the $8 billion of additional funding but 10 billion of extra funding requested by the national health service and the sustainability and transformation plans are being developed at local level in the interests of local people by local commissions. >> it's very strange the prime minister should say that, mr. speaker because the health select committee chaired by the honorable member says it's 4.5 billion, not 10 billion. it's quite a big -- there's quite a big difference there. mr. speaker, part of the reason for the strain on our national health service is that more than 1 million people are not receiving the social care that they need. as a result of this, there's been an increase in emergency admissions for older patients. margaret wrote to me this week saying -- it's not funny.

bma is more asset-sensitive than american express. at that specific ally, that is the reason. david: thank you. coming up, trading the trunk rally. investors have added $14 billion to the biggest etf tracking the s&p 500. stocks have climbed, but is it all good news? we will discuss that. this is bloomberg. ♪ david: this is bloomberg. i'm david westin. it is time to hear from key banks about what they are focusing on. stocks have rallied since the election but some more and the news may not all be good, that there are some downside risks to the economy as the president-elect takes office. since world war ii, eight of the 12 presidents have faith recession during their first year in office. joining us now for more why this trend remains prevalent is steven wieting, chief strategist at citi. i don't want to put a wet blanket on all of this euphoria make, but what are some of the downside risks? >> away from politics, our outlook for the u.s. economy has gotten generally better. a pickup in labor force participation, we know productivity

that the bma. but today, the release of confidential medical information on public figures is controversial. there is an article recently in the journal of medicine tracing out fdr's medical recently release end attitude and again criticized the notion of people revealing things in a confidential thing about their patients. okay, what does this finally conclude? others have identified moran's correctness in hpublishing his diary, besides the historians, the topical question will a patient's confidence has been outraged by a physicians account of him both in his strength and in his weakness will no longerage state the reader. this is an article of about year ago when this historian really looked at the issue of confidentiality. and said probably when everything was done, moran publishing his diary broke the code on confidentiality with notable people. is that the last word? well, i don't think so. lady psalms herself probably should have had the last word. she commented always the gracious lady you

that the bma. but today, the release of confidential medical information on public figures is controversial. there is an article recently in the journal of medicine tracing out fdr's medical recently release end attitude and again criticized the notion of people revealing things in a confidential thing about their patients. okay, what does this finally conclude? others have identified moran's correctness in hpublishing his diary, besides the historians, the topical question will a patient's confidence has been outraged by a physicians account of him both in his strength and in his weakness will no longerage state the reader. this is an article of about year ago when this historian really looked at the issue of confidentiality. and said probably when everything was done, moran publishing his diary broke the code on confidentiality with notable people. is that the last word? well, i don't think so. lady psalms herself probably should have had the last word. she commented always the gracious lady you