what the board is going to do pits meaningless nmgs unless some members of the board highlights those for our side to move forward. >> thank you president chiu there will be further analysis required based on your cigarette butts suggestion so i'd like to taken a motion to continue this meeting to the call of the chair. >> so moved. >> without objection the meeting is continued to the call of the chair was there. >> i think we need to adapt any reopens. >> okay. okay. so at this time are we would you like are we going to be able to adapt the responses that don't require further analysis within the current resolution or should we bring this back >> actually, i was going to suggest. >> chair breed all the responses and further analysis will be in the meeting on tuesday. >> i have classification on the specific recommendation. >> please identify user. >> i'm the

the board several times before but the new facts some are not that new last year after the board took action to deny the permit the department of public works orientated a tentative map of approval 9 set back line open the 1962 subdivision prevented the building and subject to that action the department of public works with drew it was accurate for the other departments to look at the application and it was subsequentially refiled we reviewed the historic records that were difficult to relocate more than 50 years ago the planning commission acts were not noted in the action no specific come a time to go back to so it took research to go back and find the minutes from the commission hearing and going back additional looking hearing by hearing to find the hearing and able to piece together the history that information lead me to condition the approval with reiterating what the department of public works had found the first time around no development under the terms of the subdivision that was issued in april 30th of this year by the department of public works at the bottom of that lette

that is on the board's website. on our website, we have a memo that lists all of the boards and commissions that are decision-making bodies, rather than advisory bodies, where the mayor or some combination of the mayor and board or board president makes the appointments. and then the city's conflict of interest code, which the board passes every other year, also includes a list of all of the boards and commissions, whose members have to file form 700, with the ethics commission. putting all three together, you can basically find everything, but the point is well-taken from the grand jury there is no easy access list. so they have asked our office to prepare such a list and we're going to do that within the next couple of months. i think our letter says within 90 days. one proviso is we're going to prepare a list alphabetized as the grand jury requests of all decision-making bodies in the city. advisory bodies sometimes come and go, created by ordinance or the mayor or departments and so our list won't track those, a

and we kick ited off with our board, at the settlement board meeting, and over the we are in october, right? >> and i forgot what month we are in. >> we are in september. >> so the meeting before, is i don't know what year that we are in. >> any way, we kicked it off at the last board meeting and we have about a two or three month out reach process and we just had a two public meetings, just a few days ago. and we have several more public meetings to come. but the team will also going where people asked and so we more than welcome the invite from the people at tjpa and that is great and we are supposed to be housed at the tpj. and so i hope that conversation can happen and the sooner the better because it is our target to issue our rfp, for january, of 2015. and so this, dialogue will inform and shape that rfp. >> and also i wanted to recognize that members of the transbay cac including bruce himself came to spaoeng at public comment last tuesday and this tuesday to speak of the importance of the (inaudible) and so i just want to appreciate the neighborhood ad volunteer casey on this

as aemthsd here in and the board suspend the board policy requiring the provisions made 3 months before sfusd invents accepting applications so the provisions shall be effective immediately would the commissions like for me to read the background >> commissioners do you - i think just the recommended action thank you. commissioners we have no public speakers commissioners any questions or comments >> yes. commissioner norton. >> so i'm going to support this recommendation i had to get my head around it and the student assignment committee whatever that was but i do feel like we need to still keep thinking about how you to attract robust enrollment at willie brown and i definitely hope i'd like to have the board get an update on the problematic work maybe as item m the project manager has reached out to me but this is an important conversation it should come to the board and be on the radio but i'm wondering superintendent if you can tonight shed light to attract a more robust and better enrollment to the willie brown. >> thank you commissioner norton we do have a multi departmental team

the boarding board has placed restrictions on how they exercise i f d bonds a process that involves extensive public review voter approval is not required by law or necessary that make sure that the public interests is protected and this is generated by port property and don't increase the taxes other cities have the mta revenue bonds bond that emancipation proclamation can you remember general obligation bonds require approval for the reason it will not be implement implemented. okay any comments? and supervisor could you go over recommendation 8 b? >> 8 b the response to the recommendation? has been implemented the departments response indicates it has and will continue implementing this recommendation which the board fully supports thank you. okay. those are my comments and suggestions for the board response are there any other comments? okay. at this time, we'll close the hearing on this matter. or do i need okay. so is there a motion to take these recommendations as an amendment to the resolution? >> so moved. >> u. >> okay moved any objections no objections this passes as amended and is

pacheco please go over the boards meeting guidelines and conduct the answering in. >> the board requests you turn off all electronic devising. >> appellant and representatives have 7 minutes to present their cases and 3 minutes for rebuttals people affiliated must include their comments within the 3 or 7 minute period the public has up to 3 minutes that are not affiliated with the parties to assist the minutes members of the public are asked but not their full participation. it felt like a really great starting point for the coming year. during this meeting, we managed to discuss some major revisions and to our bylaws and that will be finished within the next month or two and should be up for voting for approval. we also discussed about recruitments and outreach to make sure that this council's presence is known more in the community, not just to organizations bus to -- but to the general public so they understand what it is we have the power to do because i feel there is a misunderstanding and that is on our part and we developed strategies and ways to incorporate for increasing the out

before the board meeting or call the board office on mission street room 304. this meeting is broadcast live on sfgovtv cable channel 78 and dvds are available for purchase at this point we'll conduct our swearing in process if you wish to have the board give our testimony weight pleases stand and returned please note that any member of the public my speech without this thank you. do you solemnly swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give will be the whole truth and nothing but the truth? >> i do. >> thank you. >> thank you. the item one is general public comment this is for anyone that wants to speak on items not an tonight's agenda. seeing none, is converges questions or comments commissioner >> hello commissioners i'd like to point out you in our packet a letter from the commissioner president through the mayor's office regarding the attendance our obligation to strive for one hundred percent. >> thank you any other commissioner comments. any any public comment on that item? okay. seeing none item 3 commissioners is your consideration of the boards m

. >> good evening board. i want to take the opportunity to present i'm matthew brendon dpon no 1 on missouri street just three houses down i'll use my time to address the respondents brief please follow along with the brief that's helpful i plan to address all their points so first regarding their statement of of fact app at&t is exclaiming no community opposition was received at the time of the dpw hearing. you see here this is the order that dpw laid out at the may 19th meagerly or hearing the 5 dash 16 are part of the public record. as shown in the dpw comment tracking worksheet there were no comments in support. however, i believe those commentss observations were miss carding as two late because the notice of intent date ways used instead of the cut off date the dpw staff acknowledged those received when i asked dpw for those comments they informed me they've discarded on the grounds they were it deemed late at&t's argument the point of contention we're here to discuss the surface mounted facility will n

systems among the board members?uess in know, some sense, education has always been sort of immersed in politics. in some way because we vote n federal, state, and local officials who are responsible for education. they run in campaigns. they have to respond to public demands of different kinds. i think what's important, though, is to keep our eye on the ball. we about this? we're about educating children, aking america competitive nation. all of those things are what's most important. and i think what is concerning me is sometimes these debates -- off on tan jepts that tangents related nothing to educating kids. we're trying to keep the focus on kids. host: how long have you been in issues? guest: in my 35th year of working with local school boards. minute of it. i do want to say this. one oh it was reasons i like it board is because local members represent a cross section of america. i've met people from every walk imagine, hat i can farmers and college professors, astronauts, former professional baseball players,

similar to the conversation that i overheard with the board talking about attendance records. it should be easy to find. also, the ada does not specifically address the needs of limited english proficiency for san francisco residents, but the language access ordinance does and it's a specific mandate that addresss this issue. and as i mentioned earlier, the office of civic engagement and immigration affairs is tanked with monitoring enforcement with the lel. the mayor's office on disability should coordinate with commissions to ensure that statements for accommodation are easily located on websites and our response is that this has been implemented. upon the list of boards and commissions from city attorney's office, we found that the majority of the commission's agendas, 32 out of 39, already contained an accessibility notice and complied with ada requirements for the commission meeting notices, but i wanted to explain that there were some variations on how those notices were actually phrased. and that part of our work on responding here was to actually get more consistency a

pacheco please go over the boards meeting guidelines and conduct the answering in. >> the board requests you turn off all electronic devising. >> appellant and representatives have 7 minutes to present their cases and 3 minutes for rebuttals people affiliated must include their comments within the 3 or 7 minute period the public has up to 3 minutes that are not affiliated with the parties to assist the minutes members of the public are asked but not required to submit a business card speaker cards and pens are available on the left-hand side of the podium the board welcomes our comments and suggestions there are customer satisfaction survey forms on the left side of the podium if you have questions please speak to board staff before or call the board office loshthd on mission street room 304 between van ness this is broadcast live and sfgovtv cable channel 78 and dvds of this meeting are available for purchase directly in sfgovtv. >> thank you for your attention we'll conduct the swearing in if you intend to testify and wish to have the board give your testimony evidentiary wealthy pleas

again thanks to the board for working together with us for creating the budget. in his second year supervisor farrell thank you for your steadfastly leadership and commitments to building this collaborative process (clapping) i want to say thanks to dan roman field to make sure not only his capacity as controller he keeps us on a due course (clapping) and the people that helped me to make sure i've got all the issues in hand and that's my chief of staff and kate howard both from the controller's office and the mayor's office for their excellent work thank you very much (clapping) budget whiz wards i call them. but i'd like to an opportunity to specially niefrt david for a few words he's been watching this in his district and the whole board of supervisors. supervisor david chiu >> thank you mr. mayor just a couple of words first of all, those of us who were here when i came into office we had half a billions of we were debating whether to close down first stations and trying to figure out where to cut hubt i publicity and services i want to thank dan roman field

schedules please speak to the board staff or call the board office it is located at 1550 mission street this meeting is broadcast live on sfgovtv cable channel 78 and dvds are available for purchase directly in sfgovtv thank you for your attendance at this point we'll conduct our swearing in process if you intend to testify and wish to have the board give your testimony evidencey wealthy please stand and say i do after your affirmed any members of the public may speak prurntd to the sunshine ordinance testimony you're about to give will be the whole truth and nothing but the truth? thank you >> thank you mr. pacheco so the first item on tonight calendar or calendar is for anyone that wishes to speak on items not on torrents calendar seeing none, item 2 for commissioners questions or comments commissioners. >> just a reminder i'll not be in attendance for next weeks meeting. >> go giants. >> seeing none, we'll move to item 3 the boards consideration of the meeting minutes of august 27th any changes. >> now a motion to simpleminded. >> so moved. any public comment on the minutes mr. pache

none of the boards that any of the city is entitled to lead. we are not owed these jobs nor have we been given the opportunity to serve the people of san francisco. let me say this clearly. i'm not happy about what i am about to do this today. i did not want to do it publically. i did not want to do this at all but this is staring me in the face. san francisco's fire department is in disarray, our medical system is in a state of crisis. public safety is? jeopardy and i and many others have lost faith in the ability to fix it. i respect chief and joanne his wife, she's a great person and she has served the city for decades and a great ambassador at the department. but as a former fire commissioner i have to do what is right, before personality, before friendship, before tradition comes service and responsibilities. putting aside ems and overview of the department will give you a sense of it's trouble. in 2008, the department won a federal court security graj grant for nearly $10 million for a boat and fema gave them two optional one 1 year exemp

the board will. >> ready yeah.s he ready thank you >> he now resume the regular meeting no closed session appendixes this evening another informational item the staffing report for the gift of the month of august 2014 this meeting is adjourned >> welcome to the september 17, 2014, meeting of the san francisco board of appeals the proceeding officer is our vice mayor commissioner hurtado and joined by commissioner fung arrest commissioner honda the commissioner president lazarus will be absent this evening one seat vacant on pursuant to the chapter when a vacancy exists they may overrule the votes 4 votes are not required we're joining by deputy city attorney and at the controls is victor the boards legal assistant and i'm cynthia goldstein the board director we're joined by the pokes that have cases before the board scott sanchez that representing the planning department and jean ask here from 9 department of public health as well as chris buck and carla from the public works bureaucracy you urban forestry and we h

before the board meeting or call the board office on mission street room 304.ovtv cable channel 78 and dvds are available for purchase at this point we'll conduct our swearing in process if you wish to have the board give our testimony weight pleases stand and returned please note that any member of the public my speech without this thank you. do you solemnly swear or affirm

by the board of supervisors that determines that. that concludes everything that i wanted to say. i wanted to add that we have been working with city departments, particularly with the mayor's office on disability. they have been fantastic in really working with us to make sure that we're not only ensuring accessibility from the ada perspective, but also from language service and support. and again, we want to thank the civil grand jury's attention to language access issues, which we consider critical to full and meaningful civic participation. and especially i want to thank the board of supervisors for its leadership on this issue. we wouldn't be where we are today without your leadership. >> thank you, miss pond. are there any further comments from members of the civil grand jury, mike from the civil grand jury on the responses that you heard from the departments? >> very briefly, i want to thank everybody in the mayor's office for hearing our report and responding to it and taking action on it. i think what we were most concerned

a member of the board. that is the rule. >> we respect the centers for disease control by saying in essence that they are a trustworthy organization wanting to control disease. but i beg of you sir, and you too, the other dc and auflg you to go to info wars .com. i love to preach the word of god. i'm torn between one thing and the other thing that god wants me to tell you. really, these people are are despicable. they are giving them vaccines to protect them. the scripture i want to talk about what we touched on last week. everything he did was a class act. he walks in to the synagogue and reads from i -- and this scripture is fulfilled in your ears. when paul got saved he said jesus appeared to him and testified that they saw the bright light but they didn't theory voice and he couldn't prove that voice because he proved it by going to the profit, malachi and all of them because every single book testifies something of jesus christ. the best is daniel 9 because in daniel 9 -- >>president david chiu: thank

i also wyoming would like to say to my fellow board members although i'm the president of the board and facilitating those meetings i'm happy if you think something should be brought to my attendance i feel like rational equality it ends with all of us that's our leadership roll it a starts with the leadership of the district we expect our schools and our school communities to have those difficult conversations so i want to again extend my sincere apologizes for not protecting the parent voice this was brought forward to us about a subject we have a hard time talking about which is arbitrary equality and all the hours of collecting the will finding and the voices of those parent and thank them to them and extend a sincere apologize all i can say in closing one thing i've learned as a braids member we're all learning here and i know that's a good place to start from thank you. >> commissioners any comments. thank you very much for your report >> i would like to give a plug to the advisory committee georgia correct me if i am wrong is there 11 here there is a body that has built parent le

but we have focused on what this board needs. we have worked hard and put together our proposal with our hr manager we know we are capable of running this contract with our skills. i want to say that we put our heart, our mind, our soul, about 22 people worked on this. again, our whole job was to come forward and provide the best security services. finally i want to say to this board that the controversy began when andrews won the contract. we followed the process and did what we needed to do and we ask that you uphold the process. >> thank you. next speaker. >> more a bora. >> good afternoon. >> my name is morrah bora, president and ceo of security services. i would like to thank the sf mta commission for an allowing us to provide services to this agency on the contract. black beer has been providing this for san francisco for more than 18 years and in good standing with the contract monitoring division and have been on leb last year. we are enthusiastic to partner with andrew international and providing this service. we have wo

nolan, members of the board, i'm the chief

of appeals should grant the appeal one ordinance requires the board to grant the appeal the board of supervisors made retroactive the permitting requirements the public works code no longer about the s ms of the permit code and the board of supervisors can do it, it's intent that the permits articles would apply to permit not finalized by july 28th and the retroactive appeal while dpw issued an excavation permit to the site once filed there was no excavation permit and finally, there's the board can't reduce to deny the ordinance based on a claim that is preempt by state law a city and county may make and enforce it's regulations not in conflict with general law thank you and i'm here to answer questions. >> ms. fong and we'll let the courts decide whether this is properly before us or not but i'm still wondering in the course of departmental review the permit holders attorney has indicated that they are required then to provide all documents as to whether there are alternative sites or not to what extent does the department review their documentation. >> if the applicant proposes ea

of education and school board employees it's within the right of the board of education to exercise our spending of our own rules in fast tracking those changes it's duly my right asia citizen and executive director of the parents of san francisco schools to voice any opinion on this collective decision that's been made by our board of education t p.s. has been in the field for 15 years working with parents we have been the driver and tens of thousand of parents staying in san francisco and believing in public schools because of our with work we have a long-standing partnership with the district we parents for public schools have removed barriers that are prevented families from enrolling if and engaging in our public schools pr the decision this evening to fast track this process after 15 years of partnership is discouraging on so many levels not showing a process also messages something you all or p p.s. wants to say perpetuated that parents are an afterthought and community partners are an afterthought 3 times parents for public schools of san francisco has not been comes up up f

i will say that the recommendation will not be impeding the reason being well, i'll say that the board of supervisors agree with the statement the city should build implement this it is adapt terrify but resilient to the 2050 projection doesn't influence the project including explore inform storm surge or wave action or lifespan and location or failure of a project. additionally the draft guidance prepared by itself sea level rise committee will address this issue. and colleagues if you have comments recommendation one d this has to do with the city departments that are involved in the dames such dpw mta poster and coordinate the efforts to minimize any inconvenience to the public and address the certify few minutes this recommendation has been implemented while this requirement didn't officially apply to the board of supervisors currently, the city departments cooperate with various utility companies stafshd years ago. finding number 2 the city planning code has no provisions addressing the impacts associated with rising sea levels without the appropriate provisions there's no means t

and now, i resume the regular meeting of the board. this is an announcement of the closed session items. read out of the closed session 9914. public employment. the board by a vote of 7 ayes approved the contracts of one principal, one program administrator and one supervisor and other items, there are none tonight, and the meeting is adjourned. thank you. >> good afternoon. welcome to the board of supervisors land use & economic development committee. i'm scott wiener the chairman of the committee to my right is supervisor jane kim the committee vice chair sea to my left is meaning our clerk is andrea thank you to sfgovtv specific jennifer lowe >> michltd and, yes please silence any diaz and items accountant on today will be on the september 16th agenda unless otherwise stated. >> madam clerk item one. >> an ordinance for the earthquake performance evaluation of private school structures. >> colleagues, we have i along with the mayor and other supervisors are the co-sponsors of this legislation and chaegz i'm sure you're aware of over

and now, i resume the regular meeting of the board. this is an announcement of the closed session items. read out of the closed session 9914. public employment. the board by a vote of 7 ayes approved the contracts of one principal, one program administrator and one supervisor and other items, there are none tonight, and the meeting is adjourned. thank you. >> bonnie banks. bonnie banks. my definition of noise is uncontrolled music. without format. pretty simple affair. pancakes, and you're -- people get up on sundays around noon, weekends or whatever. should not be too hard to walk into place. have your audio alarm clock go off for two hours waking your up while you are eating breakfast with many interesting visuals once in a while. improvisation. listening or not to the person you're playing up against or people or machines. trying to get as many different people in as possible. different genres, experimental noise, electronics, dissonance some drums.a tiny bit of ambient -- the first noise pancake shows, 1999, the first waffle noise,

. >> two weeks ago we talked about the qualification of '83 teachers who were being put before the board you pulled that and brought them back we're curious has anyone looked at that situation i want you to look at i think this is an unusual pot on page 35 thas has to do with summer school you're setting aside 90 slots gee for middle school for summer school and doing it now that's a good thing and you're doing something good, i wanted to point out and say congratulations our doing something good it's go to have that certainly certainty about the summer for those the guys and look at k-28 an page 65 this time we're struggling with money in the district you want to spend $20,000 to make a movie i don't know about that i'm not sure about that how much with soft puppets or hand shadows you know if you're telling us you don't have money you don't have money for other people on pages 6 and 7 on you're special order you have a report that tells us you're up and ready to go in skiefsz in high schools one of the things that report didn't deal with the the facility it says you have books and borr