for me, more importantly, i do have a number of fundamental issues with rank choice of a boardivoting. the simple majority has the responsibility of -- has the ability to produce results. last year we had people running around asking for people to get there second and third votes. to me, that is not leadership. i want my city leaders, people coming to voters in saying this is my vision for this office. this is why i would ask for you to vote for me as opposed to running around asking people for their second and third votes. second of all, we talked a lot about this the last time around, the notion of voter confusion. poll after poll, voters will say they're confused by this. to me, i think there is no reason why we should have a voting system in san francisco where voters are confused. i think there is a lot of anecdotal evidence for that. there is also a ton of empirical evidence in the form of over boats and san francisco. buster's mayor's race had 1% of the votes being tossed in the garbage can because of over votes. -- last year's mayor's race had 1% of the votes being tossed in a

i am here to advocate for score boardivoting. you get to reach each of the candidates on a simple, arbitrary score of 0-4. you add up the sum total, and a person with the most votes wins. it is pretty simple. this is a list of organizations that are currently using score voting, although they do not advocate it. i am pleased to report, at the end of the month they will use core voting for the endorsement process. it has the benefits of both, but the detriment of either of the systems. it is extremely easy to understand. and there is precinct counting. like irv, it can be done without a runoff, but it can be done with the run of. those are different qualitative decisions. it also has other additional benefits. for example, you could always vote your favorite, even under the most to check of instances, and the has less physical ballot space, which will cut down on costs of what you usually need, and it will only find the center of the constituent of the spectrum that your constituency is in. besides the qualitative reasonings, we a