what the aclu and bob barr and conserroutive organizations -- let me mention conservative citizens. rosons collaborating with the aclu and civil libertarians in looking at those f1 o omplaints including. unner's rights organizations and the eagle forum and americans for tax reformienthe american conservative union to name just incs mw have concurred that the problem with these surveillance techniques is they. ive grs terinnent unchecked power t invade our privacy, intercept international telephone communications by american can citizens without suspicion of wrongd cf1 o ng. illelosl standard demands casually and loosely some basis for believing or y bspecting tht the intercepted communication cght be relevant to an ong cf1 o ng investigation. the role of the court in surveillance court has rounishe to the disappearing point. we now know thanks to one revision that was made to the patriot act in one of its authoriclu tions the inspector general of the justice department has to do surveys and rlatorts on hr y these nc. pr have been used. report after report the inspector. eneral has c

the time is long past due to do what bob barr called for them in this role as a member of congress, and that is before we can fix whatever problems have led to this national security catastrophe, we have to understand what the problems were. and that analysis was not undertaken until long afterwards when the bipartisan citizens, 9/11 commission, very respected, did its analysis and also the joint intelligence committees of both the house and the senate, and their reports did not conclude, none of them concluded, that the problem had anything to do with lack of sufficient power tone gauge in surveillance, to gather information. rather, the analysis had to do -- the analysis was that the failure lay in lack of sufficient ability to put together, lack of sufficient analysis of the information, not only because of this notorious wall to which john has alluded, but also because of such basic problems as lack of sufficient translators, lack of sufficient computing capability, bureaucratic turf bat until the different agencies. last week on the occasion of the tenth anniversary, the bipartisan

what the aclu and bob barr and conservative organizations by the way mengin in some of the citizens that have collaborated with the speed making these complaints and include gunners rights organizations, phyllis schlafly's eagle forum, americans for tax reform, the american conservative union to name just a few all have concurred that the problem with the dragnet surveillance techniques is they give the government unchecked power to invade our privacy among other things to intercept international telephone communications e-mail and indications by american citizens without any suspicion of any wrongdoing whatsoever. to be precise the system demands that very casually and loosely there be some basis for believing or suspecting the intercept a communication might be relevant to an ongoing investigation. the role of the court even the surveillance court has vanished to the disappearing point. we now know thanks to one revision that was made to the patriot act in one of its reauthorization the inspector general of the justice department has to do service reports on how they are accused and re

bob barr the former republican congress member from georgia william sessions the republican f.b.i. director former f.b.i. director the former warden of that particular person death row person of georgia allen all hold first day of his execution he's gotten three death porter death warrants before that were staged this was the fourth there were so much doubt around this forty two year old african-americans case that the world was watching and it goes to the larger issue of course of the death penalty so we were there to show i mean if executions are going to be done by the state it is important that we all watch that we are i witness to an execution it's very rare in the world we're alone in the industrialized world and instituting the death penalty this was a case in one nine hundred eighty nine a white police officer who was moonlighting as a security guard had gone to help a homeless man who's being pistol whipped and this officer named mark macphail was shot dead. troy davis was convicted of the murder there was no direct evidence no d.n.a. evidence no gun found seven of the nin

he has moved from somebody you would not remember in history, does anybody remember bob barr or any ofher libertarian candidates to someone highly influential in the republican party. he's moved entire -- to run on a third party now would simply set all of that behind and kill the republican kand sacandidacy no who he is. >> as a democrat he pray he runs, yes, ron paul run as a third party. imagine how incredibly interesting that would be for all of us who do a lot of political commenting. i think it would be cat nip for the immediate meade area, catnip for all of us. as a democrat, yes, please, run, ron paul. we would love it. >> dana? >> well, i've been one who's always been against the idea of a third party. i like to just consume from within like a cancerous tumor. that being said, i think it would be incredibly dangerous because not only would you lose the white house, but you would also run the risk of losing a chance to capture a senate majority and possibly maintain a house majority because the nominee's coat tails are the things upon which all the candidates ride upon. i think

tavis: this was like roseanne barr back in the day. wasike bob's agate, he squeaky clean on the show. tavis: we see how funny you are on the show but how does your comedy work its way into the show? >> i think all of those years working and learning how to tell the jokes. the beautiful part is how the show is well constructed in the writer's room. there is always some tenderness or a real moment. i have hadeveryone in the cast u have to have an awkward dance or confess to something that you are scared of. when a laugh comes after that, it comes kwai says chart. what i've learned from my cast and director is to take that moment and be vulnerable. -- when a laugh comes after that, it comes twice as hard. tavis: have you been a big guy most of your life? >> yes. tavis: were you treated poorly by the kids back then and now you are a success? >> i was always the big do that the party. -- dude at the party. some fat kids get pushed around and some of the one that did to roll around with everyone. i was that one. tavis: you are engage now. >> yes, i am pe

bob beckel is here. the ceo, charles payne is with us. and contributing editor for town hall magazine, katie pavlich is with us. let's run the brilliant, the genius roseanne barrknow, the ability to payback anything over $100 million of personal wealth because a maximum wage of $100 million, and over that amount then they should go to the reeducation cap and if that doesn't help, then be beheaded. >> why is the hatred toward people who are successful? when it that happen in america? >> i'm not sure. i think president obama has had success in class warfare to an extent. but i'm wondering when the last time you heard a tea party member say we should be head people, we should behead people on the other side. you can't say any because it didn't happen. then you look at the wall street protesters she was referencing, 7,000 people were arrested. and there's a double standard to the left. >> roseanne barr, she must have called her accountant the day before and said what am i worth? he must have said 999 million, $998. all the ultrarich people who are crying, michael moore, and they give these occupy wall street a vote of confidence, they are hypocrites. she should ha