beck has that information i'm setting the stage and bob, i believe yes? you will be doing that. >> yes, sir. >> and i believe that those costs are broken out by each one of these categories. >> that in our presentation? the costs broken up by category? >> i actually did not see it when i looked through it last night. i saw percentages. and i know... >> yeah, you are correct. they are percentages my percentages that is of a 64 million dollar estimated total cost and so, if for that i can. >> so everything in this presentation about safety, adds up to $64 million in added costs, >> $64.3, yes. >> what was the $74 million that i saw prior? >> we some preliminary information that we provided to the board members, there was a 74 million figure and identifying in the costs there were costs that could be deferred until phase two when we filled out the rail levels and so we are not recommending implementing those at this time. >> additional costs to what we had initially. what was the initial cost? >> some of these are difficult to identify as a total cost, when

and then explain the portions that will be discussed by bob beck and these are the items that we are used to enhance the building and safety and security program in the costs. >> okay. >>ty. thank

. >> okay, directors, bob beck will report on this item. thank you, chair kim and, members of the board. i wanted to provide an update for you on a number of factors relative to phase two, i have the potential to influence our budget, and to provide you, context on that. >> for the phase one budget. >> yes, so, i want to begin by providing some background for members of the ?oo hi, i'm holly lee. i love cooking and you are watching quick bites. san francisco is a foodie town. we san franciscoans love our food and desserts are no exceptions. there are places that specialize in any and every dessert your heart desires, from hand made ice cream to organic cakes, artisan chocolate final design and eventually into construction. >> in 2007 we concluded the competition and we began the negotiations with pelly clark pelly to become the architect for the transit center and it was in november of 2007 that the initial phase one base line budget was adopted by the tjpa board. at that point in november of 2007, the phase one budget was 1.189 billion dol

team was asked to incorporate in the project as a result of the risk and vulnerable assessment that bob beck mentioned. it was developed by the urs team. and then, subsequently turned over to the pelly clark pelly team and so i will go down this list of individual items as part of the presentation, i simply want to have them here so that you have an understanding that part of the rationale for doing this was to obtain that safety act designation. these are really some of the legal implications that are there so that as you can move forward, and legal counsel can advise you in more detail. but at the end of the day the intent is to put those who have the responsibility for developing the project, funding the project, designing the project, building the project, and operating the project, in a position of less risk. claims can be filed in a federal court. there is a cap on the extent of the file that can be filed. punitive damages are barred and there are certain terms and conditions regarding the plaintiff's opportunity for recover. i mention this because after the 93 bombing at the world tra

. >> okay, directors, bob beck will report on this item. thank you, chair kim and, members of the board. i wanted to provide an update for you on a number of factors relative to phase two, i have the potential to influence our budget, and to provide you, context on that. >> for the phase one budget. >> yes, so, i want to begin by providing some background for members of the board and for members of the public. on how the phase one base line budget was developed and evolved to the point where we are at today and then go through some of the issues that are influencing our budget perspectives looking forward, including the rva, a risk and vunerbility assessment that we performed on the project and the status of the reserves and the over all schedule for design and construction and some potential recommendations that we may bring in the future to adjust phase one budget. >> so, the initial phase one budget, in june of 2006, the tjpa board, adopted the phasing strategy for the transbay program and broke it into phase one and phase two and the fu

. >> and directors bob beck will report on this item. >> thank you, we did get a really detailed summary, which i appreciate. since we did a detailed one, we could just answer questions. >> the detail was at a pretty high level and really at the end of the day boils down to what are the economic terms of two proposals. so we did receive proposals from both pg&e and puc to provide power source to the tjpa and based on the schedule for finalizing construction documents this may we really need to commit to the space program that would be associated with one service or the other. that is why we're bringing this issue to you today. under the cpuc as a regulated utility it's pretty straightforward that tjpa would fall underneath the cpuc rate e20 classification and in the proposal that the puc has submitted to us, they would provide us a rate that would be 10% lower than the published cpuc rate that pg&e would be required to meet. the pg&e connection, the recommended connection, they presented three alternatives, but the one recommended to us was the connection to the downtown network grid. wh

bob can retire at a more appropriate age. it's not rocket science. it's just common sense. from td ameritrade. >>. >> bill: we haven't talked to glenn becktly so i demanded that he appear this evening. here is from dallas, thank you for answering the call. >> i didn't know what the ringing was. >> bill: i know you are lonely guy because i know you are talking on your radio program and internet, you are all over. you are talking about the tea party? >> yeah. >> bill: versus the republican establishment, right? >> no, i don't care if there is a tension or not but i think the republicans have betrayed their own values for so long. there a lot of people like me that tried to push the republican party into maybe, hey why don't you have common sense here? all the way along they have worked against the tea party and the people who understand the constitution and want to live by constitution. i think the tea party has made themselves irrelevant and it's time for me, i'm done with them. i'm looking for.... >> bill: who you are you done with? >> the big government establishment republicans. i support rand paul if he is republican but he is small g

bob and the granger, indiana, on the republican line. caller: i think she has been quite successful in bringing the mainstream media to her back and call. -- becknd call. i would challenge anybody to tell me or anything in the world has been any better under her service. president bill looks better now. he looks good because of the president we have right now. that is why so many people are looking back and saying, gosh, i wish we had this now. host: sam from rochester, new york. caller: the secretary of state is directed by the president of united states. i used to be a republican. i am an independent at this point in time. hillary clinton has not done much in her tenure in politics quite frankly. i remember her being part of a medical solution when president clinton was in place. she failed there. she failed as a senator in new york. i live in new york, and i think she has failed frankly in the national scene. look at korea -- look at iran -- look at benghazi, you look at various areas in the world that are still upset. they have a hard time dealing with the united states in general. and she has been a puppet. i think that is pretty much the