but i do think the democrats and republicans, just like robert reich and bob greenstein on the democratic side, conservatives going back to milton freedman on the republican side have said can come together and find a way to make sure that in the future these rules don't subsidize inefficiency and also disproportionally favor the most affluent. what is really tragic in the state of delaware, state of oregon, state of georgia is if somebody doesn't have health care coverage, doesn't have a health care plan, works in a furniture store outside atlanta, doesn't have health care coverage, they in effect have their federal tax dollar subsidize somebody who's particularly well off who decides they want to get a designer smile on their health care plan. can't we all say in the interest of protecting taxpayers and fairness, we want that person who is interested in their designer smile to be able to buy as many of them as they want. but can't we agree, democrats and republicans, that if they're going to get a designer smile, they're going to pay for it with their own money rather than with subsidiz