let�*s discuss that with the conservative mp sir bob neill who is the chairman of thejustice mp sir bobw close is that it actually happening? it is change this. how close is that it actually happening?— change this. how close is that it actually happening? it is clear that it is very distressing, _ actually happening? it is clear that it is very distressing, what - actually happening? it is clear that it is very distressing, what the - it is very distressing, what the family— it is very distressing, what the family red _ it is very distressing, what the family red out there, and there is real anqer— family red out there, and there is real anger about the fact some defendants in high—profile cases have _ defendants in high—profile cases have chosen to be behave in this regard _ have chosen to be behave in this regard and — have chosen to be behave in this regard and it is cowardly and disrespectful, and it is able so i totally— disrespectful, and it is able so i totally understand what the family have just — totally understand what the family have just said. the one thing we have _ have

let�*s have a word with sir bob neill, conservative mp, chair of thejustice with sir bob neill, conservativeing to you, what we think and why is it taking so long to get anywhere on this, bob? it is much harder than it seems at first glance, for some of the reasons that have already been rehearsed, instinctively everybody feels that the behaviour of people like lucy letby and others has been absolutely despicable, and it is in absolutely despicable, and it is in a right depriving the grieving families, victims of murder in particular, that ability to see the whites of the eyes, which i can quite understand. but there is the problem, the caller raised a very serious practical one, the law can�*t compel somebody to be brought to court itself, it is possible that the judge can give a directory for them to be brought up to the dock, provided reasonable force is used, we could certainly strengthen the ability of the judge to order that, but it must ultimately always be the decision of the judge, because of thejudges in charge of decision of the judge, because of the judges in charge of the core,

let's talk to conservative mp and chair of the commons justice committee sir bob neill., your thoughts about this proposal. it all, your thoughts about this premat— all, your thoughts about this --roosal. , ., _, , , proposal. it will be a completely foolish idea, _ proposal. it will be a completely foolish idea, and _ proposal. it will be a completely foolish idea, and absolutely - proposal. it will be a completely i foolish idea, and absolutely wrong. it isn't conservative party policy, it isn't government policy. whoever these unnamed people are speak of themselves, not the government and not for the conservative party. it would be a great error to do so. to leave the echr would mean leaving the council of europe. that would mean we would be the same company as russia and belarus, the only other two european countries are not members of the council of europe. i don't think any conservative would want to be in this company. figs don't think any conservative would want to be in this company. as you have stated — want to be in this company. as you have stated it _ want to

sentiments echoed by sir bob neill.ee and had called for this change. when the state makes an error, it's right and proper that the state accepts that as swiftly as possible and, secondly, that the state then doesn't try and put needless obstacles in the way of somebody seeking recompense. key among the obstacles is a new test, introduced in 2014, that means that victims of miscarriages ofjustice need to prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt. that is an extremely difficult l hurdle to meet and that is why hardly anyone is now getting compensation any more. - even very serious cases - where people have been in prison for murder or rape for years, i for cases which were accepted as miscarriages ofjustice, are not meeting this test. because it's so brutal. it's cruel. and it needs to change. for now, andy is surviving on benefits. he says getting compensation could take two years and will be kept. they should be making sure that i'm compensated speedily and also, even the amount is kind of insulting because they've

i think i've just told sir bob neill to go and get me a cappuccino.rning. jim dale is here this morning. jim it's very difficult to argue when bob talking about when you hear bob talking about the impacts on some of the most marginalised people, those on low income pensioners who have a little run around , they've had little run around, they've had for a few years who thought they could carry on visiting the grandchildren in it and not have to pay this £12.50 a day or risk the £90 fine. and so just give us some sort of proportionality here as to why we need to have this. >> the reason we have to have it is, is the direction of travel in terms of health, in terms of environment, in terms of small steps. and i say that as a meteorologist in terms of the climate change side of things. that's all we can do. we can't do this this on our own. and this has been replicated in certain ways across the country. so we're standing here in a pedestrian which which pedestrian zone, which is which is nice . it's pedestrian zone, which is which is nice. it's no pedest

that's your constituency in fact, sir bob neill again. constituency in fact, sir bob nei good again. nei good to again. constituency in fact, sir bob nei good to see 1. constituency in fact, sir bob nei good to see you. >> good to see you. >> and lovely see you. he >> and lovely to see you. he bought a coffee on bromley bought me a coffee on bromley high street the other day. >> why she's been raving >> that's why she's been raving about she says he about you, sir bob. she says he bought coffee. cappuccino bought me a coffee. a cappuccino at perfect. at pitch perfect. >> was proper cappuccino, >> it was a proper cappuccino, too. it was very good. >> now, sir bob, you've known grant shapps a long time. grant shapps for a long time. >> i've grant a >> i've known grant shapps a long time. doubts he's long time. nobody doubts he's competent. but long time. nobody doubts he's corinteresting but long time. nobody doubts he's corinteresting appointment. but an interesting appointment. beanng an interesting appointment. bearing in mind what's happening in ukraine very serious in ukraine in a

and conservative mp bob neill.nt modern britain because too many of the players are white with blue eyes. can't we just let something not be about race anyway ? the london about race anyway? the london mayor's office has been found to try and silence. silence who found the ulez scheme due to be expanded next monday , had little expanded next monday, had little impact on pollution . sadiq impact on pollution. sadiq khan's environment deputy said that she was, quote, really disappointed at the imperial college report . i bet she was. college report. i bet she was. which claims that ulez cuts nitrogen dioxide by less than 3% and has in significant effects on the ozone. it says the ulez scrappage scheme has been opened up to all londoners today, giving drivers with a non ulez compliant vehicle the chance to apply compliant vehicle the chance to apply for up to £2,000 to replace their car, despite the fact that, of course in a lot of cases their cars will indeed be worth a lot more than £2,000. lisa hartle our london re

sentiments echoed by sir bob neill. introduced in 2014, that means that victims of miscarriages ofjustice need to prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt. that is an extremely difficult hurdle to meet and that is why hardly anyone is now getting compensation anymore. even very serious cases where people have been in prison for murder or rape for years, for cases which were accepted as miscarriages ofjustice, are not meeting this test because it's so brutal. it's cruel. and it needs to change. for now, andy is surviving on benefits. he says getting compensation could take two years and will be kept. they should be making sure that i'm compensated speedily and also, even the amount is kind of insulting because they've capped it at ten years. how is that possible, you know? the more time that you've been tortured and held captive wrongfully, the more you should get. they didn't cap my imprisonment but they'll cap the money that they're obliged to pay in compensation. cheering and applause when andy malkinson left the

of conservative >> it's a number of conservative mps said, i see mps themselves have said, i see bob neill't the echr flawed? no i don't think it is. i think you have to remember where it came it came from the came from. it came from the fallout from the second world war. he was partly created by britain , as a matter of fact, to britain, as a matter of fact, to try to make sure that what happenedin try to make sure that what happened in the 1930 couldn't happened in the 1930 couldn't happen again. that's the origin of it, to make sure individual rights are protected. and it's not the rights, the way, not just the rights, by the way, of coming into the of people coming into the country. as country. it's our rights as british citizens, our ability to go to the courts against perhaps an overweening government at some point and to say, no, the government shouldn't be doing that. we have our rights as a democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of association, things that gb news regularly champions, quite rightly . and we champions, quite rightly. and we want those protected . and if you want tho