coming tory bob seely, coming up, a tory mp, bob seely, bnngs a coming up, a tory mp, bob seely, brings a bill to strip the sussexes of their royal titles. parliament step titles. should parliament step to the harry and meghan to in take the harry and meghan down peg. my royal down a peg. now, my royal masterminds, lady colin campbell and dampier, their and phil dampier, deliver their unrivalled analysis. that's very soon. cleverly soon. but next, james cleverly gloats in the house of commons today he'd bring down net migration to circa about 400,000 double 2019 levels. so how have we fallen so far ? i will ask the we fallen so far? i will ask the leader of reform uk richard tice . he'll react to a channel migrants spraying his hotel room full of 20 and i think maybe £50 notes. you will not believe this clip. don't thursday from six till 930 . thursday from six till 930. >> big royal news heading your way because our royal mastermind is are waiting in the wings. but right now it's time for the leader of reform uk richard tice. i've got three big tice. and i've got three big topics get t

coming tory bob seely, coming up, a tory mp, bob seely, bnngs a coming up, a tory mp, bob seely, brings strip the sussexes of their royal titles. parliament step titles. should parliament step to the harry and meghan to in take the harry and meghan down peg. my royal down a peg. now, my royal masterminds, lady colin campbell and dampier, their and phil dampier, deliver their unrivalled analysis. that's very soon. cleverly soon. but next, james cleverly gloats in the house of commons today he'd bring down net migration to circa about 400,000 double 2019 levels. so how have we fallen so far ? i will ask the we fallen so far? i will ask the leader of reform uk richard tice . he'll react to a channel migrants spraying his hotel room full of 20 and i think maybe £50 notes. you will not believe this clip. don't thursday from six till 930 . thursday from six till 930. >> big royal news heading your way because our royal mastermind is are waiting in the wings. but right now it's time for the leader of reform uk richard tice. i've got three big tice. and i've got three big topics get through ton

this comes bill, bob seely.s blighter scobie supposedly accidentally revealed the names of the alleged royal racists in the dutch translation of his book. well, i'm joined now by the greatest expert available on this, the royal biographer and commentator angela levin. angela, thank you so much forjoining me. i've been waiting to get you on my program because you'll be waiting regular for gb news. so the of albany, the duke the duke of albany, the duke of cumberland son and cumberland and his son and viscount taaffe had their titles taken away by the titles deprivation act because as they were fighting for the enemy, they were on the enemy's side in a war. they were arguably traitors, though not necessarily because some of them had been in germany or austria their whole lives. this really isn't the case for the duke of sussex. it's overkill, isn't it ? yes. it's overkill, isn't it? yes. >> it's not going to work anyway , because as you you know, more than me that there's only 20 people who can give an idea that t

bob seely, thank you so much joining afraid much forjoining us.ing to france because they've very they've got some very interesting policy announcements, at least proposals. we'll let you know what those are sunday mornings from 930 on gb news is . news is. >> good afternoon, britain on now is the covid inquire tree an exercise in finding the truth or an exercise in pointing the finger? well joining us this afternoon to discuss this is the journalist and broadcaster ella whelan and the former labour mp simon danczuk. yes well, that's the question we want to ask you . the question we want to ask you. >> really, simon, do you think it's a bit a bit about it's a bit a bit more about pointing fingers than actually finding truth ? finding the truth? >> i think it is, and i don't think that's appropriate. i think that's appropriate. i think should more think it should be much more effective efficient and effective and efficient and a shorter inquiry. we're spending effective and efficient and a shotoo inquiry. we're spending effective and efficient and

but anyway, the conservative mp bob seely , the conservative mp bob seely, he he wants to pass he haso pass a bill parliament that would bill in parliament that would strip duchess strip the duke and duchess of sussex their titles. many sussex of their titles. many people will have a strong view as to whether or not these people should royal titles people should have royal titles in place. but in the first place. but notwithstanding that, you could share view that you share your view on that if you want. you think this is want. but do you think this is a good use of parliamentary time? >> ben so i indulge in a bit of harry meghan yesterday. harry and meghan chat yesterday. i news and all the i think on gb news and all the social media feedback i got was, why are you wasting time on harry and meghan? and i agree with the social media feedback. i can't bear chatting about harry and meghan. i just see to self entitled self indulgent, whinging snow flake millennials and i wish they'd just get off our screen, go to the states and leave us alone. >> so hence my question. but do you parliame

but bob seely, the famous bob seely, the conservative mp, has said the conservative mp, has said the option of denying the couple their duke and duchess, standing amid royal racism row. and that's what this story is about. this story is about the racism row and the fact that they've remained silent on it. they've quite happily allowed this rumour permeate and have this rumour to permeate and have their under the their family chucked under the bus because don't care. bus because they don't care. okay. bus because they don't care. okevery lewis, anything >> very briefly, lewis, anything on a on it. number one >> yeah, a lot on it. number one is no time for love. but the royal family is not racist. they don't care about the colour of somebody's they care somebody's skin. they just care about don't care about about it. they don't care about they care about going they just care about who's going to provide the strawberries and the scones their afternoon to provide the strawberries and the �*theys their afternoon to provide the strawberries and the �*they don't heir afternoon to provide th

but bob seely, the famous bob seely, the conservative mp, has said the conservative mp, has said the option of denying the couple their duke and duchess, standing amid royal racism row. and that's what this story is about. this story is about the racism row and the fact that they've remained silent on it. they've quite happily allowed this rumour permeate and have this rumour to permeate and have their under the their family chucked under the bus because don't care. bus because they don't care. okay. bus because they don't care. okevery lewis, anything >> very briefly, lewis, anything on a on it. number one >> yeah, a lot on it. number one is no time for love. but the royal family is not racist. they don't care about the colour of somebody's they care somebody's skin. they just care about don't care about about it. they don't care about they care about going they just care about who's going to provide the strawberries and the scones their afternoon to provide the strawberries and the �*theys their afternoon to provide the strawberries and the �*they don't heir afternoon to provide th

we're going to talk now to the tory mp for the isle of wight, bob seely. g to you. night. bob, good morning to you. >> . morning. morning. >> morning. morning. morning. morning, you morning, andrew. how are you doing? >> morning. and a more comfortable perhaps comfortable majority perhaps than were predicting. >> yeah , to be honest, i thought >> yeah, to be honest, i thought it was going to be a bit closer, so i'm absolutely delighted that it a good, comfortable it was a good, comfortable majority the majority and well done. the prime minister james prime minister and james cleverly who abstained. >> bob, what was their motivation ? okay bev, i think if motivation? okay bev, i think if you look at some of the extensions or a lot of them, well, some of them were slipped. >> so some of the people may have been away for personal reasons. et cetera. cetera. reasons. et cetera. et cetera. there were just under 30 people who to vote who didn't want to vote positively support the bill. positively to support the bill. and clearly, have to make and clearly, we have

becfor the isle novwight, bob ry mp for the isle of wight, bob seely, about legislation seely, talkingstrip the sussexes of their titles. let's not forget these were that were given to were titles that were given to them marriage in 2018 them upon marriage in 2018 by them upon marriage in 2018 by the late queen. it will require a letters patent. i think, by the king to change this arrangement. i mean, do you think they are worthy of losing their titles? michael well, first of all, let me declare my position on titles. >> i think titles are a bit of a nonsense . you may have noticed nonsense. you may have noticed that i've acquired very many that i've not acquired very many myself during my career, so a fuss about titles is not one that interests me at all. i mean, it seems to me that what meghan and harry might most enjoy in life is attention and if there's any means of depriving them of attention, i think that's more important than depriving them of titles, depriving them of titles, depriving them of titles, depriving them of titles would give them more attention in. >> and you'd have

and on that topic, i'm joined now by conservative mp bob seely, who joins me now. k you for joining us on the show on this historic day. some news has just come in a rumour, bob. the dup eight votes intend to vote against the conservative party leaving them only 21 shy of an historic defeat . how do you see this vote defeat. how do you see this vote panning out at 7 pm. tonight ? panning out at 7 pm. tonight? >> i hope we're going to win. >> i hope we're going to win. >> and i think we'll win it. >> and i think we'll win it. >> there may be a few abstentions or votes against. >> if you're saying we're going to lose it, that's to news me. >> and that's a big call. martin and what do you base that? >> no, i'm not saying will >> no, i'm not saying you will lose i'm saying there is lose it. i'm saying there is talk you may and the talk you may lose it. and the margin only 29 of a swing. margin is only 29 of a swing. and we've confirmed that and we've just confirmed that there eight. well, we've there are eight. well, we've heard from the dup. so heard eight from the dup

can understand why people are starting to get increasingly irked it's irked by it, whether it's bob seelyot of value from still having that association the royal association with the royal family, having that formal title and always have that and they'll always have that association, will association, though harry will harry son of harry will always be the son of the king harry will always be the son of the that's the point. and the >> that's the point. and the other issue of course, that other issue is, of course, that the of duke duchess the titles of duke and duchess of sussex bestowed on them of sussex were bestowed on them by or queen, and by her majesty or the queen, and really , so if anyone's going to really, so if anyone's going to take off them, it's got to be take it off them, it's got to be the king and not not anyone else. seems very unlikely >> yeah, it seems very unlikely that would actually happen, that it would actually happen, but it's a reminder, as well of just how damaging this has just how damaging this row has been. they've tried to been. i know they've tried to eng

oh, well, because seely, his backbench because bob seely, his backbench colleague, suggesting they colleaguecause obviously sort of obviously he's all for sort of civil liberties and he's put forward a motion in the house or he and i wonder much he has. and i wonder how much support it's to get. support it's going to get. >> some very old law. >> invoking some very old law. >> invoking some very old law. >> well, indeed. and i think it could happen technically, but it needs across needs to get support across the house. just not sure house. and i'm just not sure that many mps are that excited house. and i'm just not sure that m issue. ’s are that excited by the issue. >> i think you'd have to go and then it would have to get royal. >> yeah, and it's an awkward one because it's also awkward because it's also awkward because titles were gift because the titles were a gift upon by the late queen, upon marriage by the late queen, so difficult so it's quite difficult to dabble and you need a dabble with that. and you need a letters change et letters patent to change it. et cetera. also to be ceter