you are right, bj pak was replaced by bobby christine was thought to be somebody who is a close allychristine gets to the office, audio of a meeting he has with the stuff there is leaked to the atlanta journal-constitution in that audio, bobby christine says, i now look at these cases myself i am not seeing fraud i expected to comment and find a lot of fraud based on things i've been seeing and heard i got here and i found the exact same thing that bj pak found. indeed, while people were worried that bobby christine was going to come in and do something dramatic for trump, instead what he did is he came in, said nothing, and suddenly this interesting audio leaks out where he himself says there is no fraud once again, reiterating what bj pak had privately said. what jeffrey rosen had privately set and would bill barr has said privately and publicly. we are not finding the widespread fraud that would impact the results of this election whatsoever. but >> last question for you on this, katy we believe that the department of justice inspector general is looking at mr. bj pak resignation

you're right, pak was replaced by bobby christine, who was thought to be a close ally of president trump's, audio of a meeting that he has with the staff is leaked to the atlanta journal-constitution. and christine says, i've looked at these cases myself, i'm not seeing fraud. i expected to come in and see a lot of fraud based on things i'm reading and have heard, but i'm finding the same things that b.j. pak found. so people were worried that christine would do some dramatic for trump, but he came in, said nothing, and then this interesting audio leaks out where he says there's no fraud. reiterating what b.j. pak had privately said, what jeffrey rosen had privately said, and bill barr had said publicly and privately. we're not finding the kind of >> last question for you on this. we believe that the department of justice inspector general is looking at mr. pack's resignation and the circumstances therein as part of his investigation as to what happened with the white house pressuring the justice department around trying to overturn the election results. we've also seen some senators come

but at the end of the day, after bj resigned, bobby christine came up from the southern district, theentee ballot fraud task force. as soon as he got here, he did his own research and he said there is nothing here. >> and let me ask you. have you been contacted by the january 6th select committee that is looking into what happened at the insurrection on the capital, at the capital, and have they requested your testimony? >> no, they haven't reached out to me. >> and if they were to reach out to you, would you -- would you speak with that committee? >> absolutely. i follow the law. i follow the process. and if i was requested to testify, i would do so. >> and what's the status of the investigation in georgia right now. is your office going to be cooperating, for example? i know it has been with the fulton county prosecutor's office that is looking into that phone call that you had with former president trump? and how far along is your office in looking into all that? where is that investigation going? >> we cooperate with every single law enforcement agency. we believe in the rule of l

lost but trump replaced pak with a much more friendly prosecutor from southern georgia named bobby christine. according to the atlanta journal constitution, christine donated $2800 to trump's reelection campaign and described as someone who was quote absolutely devoted to trump. manu raju is "outfront" live. what more are you learning what happened in that interview tonight with b.j. pak? >> a source said pak testified for two to three and a half hours today and planned on resigning on january 20th but when he caught wind that he was going to be fired, he decided to quitterlier. now i am told that he also believed that donald trump simply did not like him, did not think he was working hard enough and "the new york times" reported also that he would not back trump's claims that the election was fraudulent in someway in georgia. that being part of the reason why that he stepped aside but this is all part of the investigation that this committee is launching into interference of the justice department after november 3rd, efforts by donald trump some of his allies to try to urge the justice depa

about the election in georgia based on the overwhelming allegations of fraud there, however, bobby christinein savannah came in to take bj pok's spot, look, there's nothing here. it doesn't exist. so again, this is a really critical testimony. it is one of a series of we heard from jeffrey rosen. we know senate judiciary wants to hear from jeffrey clark. this is one more stop along this long time line we'll hear a lot more about what actually happened. >> "the new york times" reports that pok said it was investigated by federal authorities they and they found no merit to the claims that trump was making. he basically quit because he wasn't going to lie, he wasn't going to vocalize the lie that trump was insisting that he do. so, robert, what do you make of this? what do you make of this decision by him to quit rather than lie publicly? >> i don't think that people can understand as a prosecutor what is happening here to the rule of law. when i was the prosecutor, nobody would even think a politician trying to influence a decision i was making. respectfully with regard to mr. pok, i feel bad