>> so let's talk about a completely hypothetical case involving bowling and boembar.bombar jay produces a neat aircraft with new technology. it has all the advantages of new technology, faster, lighter, more cost effective, and another company, a u.s. company, boeing, for example, says we don't like that. we're going to put counterveiling duties by approaching the u.s. department of commerce saying whatever they said, and 220% duties are assigned with another 80% for counter dumping. so 300% duties. wait a second. boeing didn't submit a bid for the aircraft type. because they don't have an aircraft which meets the qualification of the customer. who is american airline. so they didn't submit a bid. and one of the understandings is you have to show material damage. how do you show material damage when you didn't submit a bid? you didn't take part in the competition, and you don't have an aircraft which can compete. and the answer is, well, you can't. so why did they really do it? this completely hypothetical situation? because boeing is looking down range and seeing wha