bogdan khmelnitsky from the white church in 1651 year, that’s how happy pereoslav was in advance, whenkhmelnitsky complains about the dishonesty and injustice of the poles, and in the end they ask. and look at what language it is in general. letter 137. by the great mercy of god. to the sovereign tsar and grand duke alexei mikhailovich, self-defender of all russia, to his royal majesty bogdan khmelnitsky, hetman of the zaporozhye army, we beat the entire zaporozhye army with our foreheads. and further, we see the mercy of your royal majesty, we ask, as an orthodox tsar, not to let us out of your mercy released, no longer tolerated non-believers. that is , he did not give any more permission to the gentiles, as we had previously wished, and now we wish for your royal majesty to be our sovereign and king... to reign over all lands. white church, march 19, 1651. your royal majesty, our gracious sovereign, is allowed in everything, that is, obedient servants. bogdan khmelnytsky, hetman with the zaporozhye army, with his hand. please note that, firstly, the letter is dated. khmelnytsky seem

is a letter with a high degree of probability from putin’s folder, written in his own hand bogdan khmelnitskye white church in 1651 . that’s how happy pereoslav was in advance, when the cossacks were still under the poles. khmelnitsky complains about the dishonesty and injustice of the poles, and in the end they ask. and look at... your royal majesty, our gracious sovereign, free in everything, that is, obedient servants. bogdan khmelnitsky, hetmand with the zaporozhye army, with his hand. please note that firstly, the letter is dated 1651, that is, another 3 years before the pereoslav rada. secondly, both in this... and in all the rest, no ukraine is mentioned anywhere. thirdly, khmelnytsky appears to be the hetman of the zaporozhye army. there is no mention of any cossack state, either here or anywhere in the texts. and, finally, and most importantly, they ask to go to russia. they have been asking for a long time for years. for moscow, all this meant war with the poles. when is tsar alexei mikhailovich. nevertheless, he decided to return the russian lands, the zemsky sobor supported, and t

after all, these are documents from the archive, copies of letters, uh, here are letters from bogdan khmelnitskyho controlled power in this part of the russians lands, which we now call ukraine , he wrote to warsaw demanding respect for their rights, and after he received a refusal, he began to write, write letters to moscow with a request to take them under the strong hand of the moscow tsar, there is a copy of these documents, the kingdom and as expected , the war with poland began, it lasted 13 years, then a truce was concluded, just after the conclusion of this act of 1654, after 30, in my opinion, 2 years, peace was concluded with poland, eternal peace, as it was said then, these lands, the entire left bank of the dnieper, including kyiv, went to russia. the pillars of ukrainian independence said that it should have very good relations with russia, they insisted on this , insisted, but nevertheless, after the revolution of 1917, the bolsheviks tried to restore statehood, a civil war broke out, including with poland , a peace was signed with poland in 1921, according to which the western par

principle, was nothing to them... copies of where the letters are, here are the letters of bogdan khmelnitskyhen the person who controlled the power in this part of the russian lands, which we now call ukraine, he wrote to warsaw demanding that their rights be respected, and after being refused, began to write letters to moscow with a request to take them under the strong hand of the moscow tsar, there is a copy of these documents, i will leave them with you as a good memory, there is a translation into russian, poland, it lasted for 13 years, then the truce was concluded, just after the conclusion of this act of 1654, after 30, in my opinion, 2 years, peace was concluded with poland, eternal peace, as it was said then, these lands, the entire left bank of the dnieper, including kiev, went to russia, the entire right bank of the dnieper remained with poland . then during the time of catherine ii russia returned all its historical lands, including the south, west, this is all a continuation. this idea, which was once born in poland, that the people living in this territory are not entirely rus

president also gave tucker a folder with copies of historical documents from the ryuurikovichs to bogdan khmelnitskyt he, tucker, could consolidate what he had already heard at home in america. in this regard, the most popular meme on the internet now looks like this: tucker’s face and the question: what is a pecheneg? jokes aside, but putin told the history of an entire state without clues, without cheat sheets, with exact dates. biden, at the same time tortured in america, with a strong memory, has now taken up his post, is he really ready to lead a nuclear state? the main topic of putin's conversation with tucker is war. hot ukrainian, cold from the west. tucker asked the question: is there a feeling that everything could end in a global war, that is, a nuclear war. and can putin? and ukraine is an unconditional satellite of the united states today, well, it’s obvious, i don’t i want this to sound like some kind of curse or insult to someone, well, we understand, yes, what is happening, financial support, how much 72 billion they gave, germany is in second place , other european countries are in

amount of detail of the tv presenter, a historian by education, and covers a huge period from bogdan khmelnitskylenin and stalin, from the so-called... instead of the promised non-expansion of nato to the east , it is also a deception, despite this russia proposed creating a joint us and europe and a missile defense system defense, came from washington refusal. and when our country, together with the states , was fighting international terrorism, the americans openly supported the bandits in the north caucasus, calling the militants the opposition. i once raised this question with my colleague, also the president of the united states, and he said: well, it can’t be, you have proof, yes. i was ready for this conversation, and i gave him this proof, he looked, and you know what he said, but i apologize, yes, but that’s how it was, i’ll quote, he says, well, i’ll kick their ass, we waited, waited for an answer , there was no answer, american style deception has been adopted in europe in modern times; the german chancellor and the french president, who sat kiev at the negotiating table on donbass, a

they say, let’s still figure it out by turning to the primary sources: here are letters from bogdan khmelnitskyho controlled the power in this part of the russian lands, which we now call ukraine, he wrote to warsaw with a demand respect for their rights, and after receiving a refusal, he began to write letters to moscow with a request to take them under the strong hand of the moscow tsar, so they gradually moved further, reaching south russian lands recaptured from turkey. created by the will of stalin. it is clear that khrushchev made his, in a certain sense, artificial state, his contribution to the territorial expansion of ukraine by illegally taking crimea from russia, and then. the largest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century, important points for understanding, again, for american viewers. 1991 - collapse of the soviet union. and everything that ukraine received as a gift from russia from the barsky shoulder, it took with it. this collapse of the soviet union was essentially initiated by the russian leadership. i don't know what then the leadership of russia was guided. that ther

these documents. from the archive of the copy where the letters are, here are the letters of bogdan khmelnitskyan who controlled the power in this part of the russian lands, which we now call ukraine, he wrote to warsaw demanding respect for their rights, and after he received refusal, began to write, write letters to moscow with a request to take them under the strong hand of the moscow tsar, there are copies of these documents, i will leave them for you as a good memory, there is a translation there. into russian, well, you will translate it into english later, russia did not agree to accept them right away, because it proceeded from the fact that a war with poland would begin, after all, in 1064, the zemsky sobor was a representative body of power of the ancient russian state, the decision was made, this part of the ancient russian lands became part of the moscow kingdom and, as expected, the war began with... it continued until the revolution, yes, before the first world war, taking advantage of these ideas of ukrainization, the austrian general staff very actively began to promote the idea

these are documents from the archive , copies, where are the letters, here are the letters of bogdan khmelnitsky the man who controlled the power in this part of the russian lands, which we now call ukraine, he wrote to warsaw demanding respect for their rights, and after received a refusal, began to write letters to moscow with a request to take them under the strong hand of the moscow tsar, there is a copy of these documents, i'll leave them with you for good measure. the modern relationship between russia and ukraine has been influenced by the arrogant west. vladimir putin recalled the pro-ukrainian nazis of the great patriotic war, who killed russian poles and jews, and about the period of the collapse of the ussr, and about the events of recent years, unfortunately, it was not possible to completely eradicate nazism, there is also the desire of the independent to join nato. after 1991, when russia expected to be taken into a brotherly family. european countries, but there is no need for nato to expand, he said so, if nato will spread, everything will be the same as in the cold war, only clo

history of difficult relations between the zaporozhye network and russia in the letters of bogdan khmelnitsky say, he who has ears, let him hear, and he who has eyes, let him see. mikhail akinchenko, marina melnik, channel one. the interview, which by this time had already received 191 million views. in only one social network x, the former twitter, addressed to a wide western audience, not to the authorities, who know perfectly well what vladimir putin thinks. here you don’t need to know, but want to negotiate. today we will also discuss how the reaction of politicians and the press, primarily in america, was driven by desire. in the leningrad region, on the famous road of life near vsevloshsk, a monument was opened, which is dedicated to children born during the siege. the city became home to thousands of planted orphans. city ​​sculpture of a woman with a baby in her arms, against the background of a broken window, leningrad madonna, symbol life, maternal care, and at the same time reminders of a terrible tragedy. for more than three years of the siege, leningraders had to live in monstrou

putin conveyed to an american journalist copies of historical documents and letters in which bogdan khmelnitskyouthern lands under strong rule. left kiev for the united states, which means there was no ukraine there, if he says, that he fled from russia, apparently, mr. blinky, our man, it’s only in vain that he makes such public statements, this can lead to failure, in addition, while discussing the american policy of american politicians, putin directly answered what is perhaps the most intriguing in the run-up of the us presidential elections, the question is: who is better for us, biden or trump? biden, he's more of a man. he is predictable, he is a politician of the old formation, but we will work with any us leader who the american people will trust. and according to putin, news about the health problems of the current us president should not be given close attention, especially against the backdrop of the election race in the states. listen, when i met with biden in switzerland, it was true several years ago, 3 years there, well, then they already said that he was incompetent. i didn’t s

crimea and donbass, and if you don’t like it, you can return to the borders of the times of bogdan khmelnitskys of that agreement. and this is how you manage to ruin your relationship. a good salary, delicious food and normal human living conditions are more important than any crimea, i really think so. what took centuries to develop in one day, even if it was decided by representatives of the communist nomenklatura together with nationalists, this cannot be changed in one day. the leader of the kiev regime and the new israeli citizen are representatives of the same generation, a former comedian before. recently, she has to constantly look back, zelensky’s gang decided to make a sacred victim out of the socialite, so that they could then blame russia for her death. specific threats against me. on july 14, neo-nazi members were detained in moscow and the ryazan region. groups recruited by the ukrainian special services. the ukrainian special services contacted me and offered us contract killing of margarita simonyan for siny sobchak. ukrainian terrorists conducted reconnaissance at the work and

trinity college, where the russian land came from, starts from the 9th century and reaches bogdan khmelnitskyo some kind of global war, and a global war will put all of humanity on the brink of destruction, this is obvious, the thaw in relations after the cold war did not last long, when moscow acted against the barbaric bombing of yugoslavia in ninety-nine and raised her voice in... do you think this is possible? suddenly he said: “you know, this is interesting. i think so. and in the evening, when we met with him, it was already for dinner. these are not the substances that take place in such cases, we just realized that we they don't wait there, that's all. the situation repeated itself when putin proposed to the next us president bush jr. to cooperate on a missile defense system, it was on july 2, 2007 at bush sr.'s ranch in keenebankpurt. in the photo, putin gives flowers the first lady of the united states, in the company of two american presidents, father and son, rides on... decisions were loaded there and the baltic states there and all of eastern europe and so on. and now i come to

his historical part, vladimir putin used such a state as poland, here is poland, as it was, bogdan khmelnitskynderstand, well, how can this be, why do these hungarians damn my transcarpathia, well , volodya, maybe, maybe it ’s still i understand correctly that the land is being taken away from the ruthenian prince, maybe not, well, wait, why, listen, why are the hungarians fighting for transcarpathia now, the ruthenian prince vasil mich is the first to demand not to touch him sob . he’s like that, but crimea is russian, yes, he’s right, no, he, well, i, because he doesn’t like him i need him, i already understand that crimea is russian , and he’s such a bastard, he wants to chop off western ukraine, there’s just no point in me, these are the hardest times, a change is coming, at this time in ukraine all the crap that can happen is manifesting itself, manifested itself in three cases, the first case when two hetmans, zaluzhi and zelensky carried their already public struggle to such an extent that... in the end one ate the other, then, as a response to this on the maidan in the kiev maidan, but