all of that money feeds a health care bohemith. so you think it would be inefficient. that seems sensible, right? the private sector can do things more efficiently? it doesn't work in health care. >> a bureau chief for the "washington post" toured the health care systems for his recent book "the healing of america." >> the least efficient pairs is the insurance companies, and that's a 30% tax on every dollar you spend on health care. britain is totally socialized medicine and administrative costs, 5%, and canada is private doctors, and public payers, and 6% administrative costs. so it turns out in health care, governments are doing this more efficiently than our private sector. >> one reason, private insurers in america spend more money on nonmedical costs, like ads and review claims to help them stay profitable. another way they can be more efficient is by having a more coordinated approach to health care. for instance, the nhs rewards primary care doctors with bonuses for good health, like getting people to stop smoking. that means lower health care costs for the cou