it can only be andrew bolc's opinion. who was in charle of be andrew bolc's opinion.olc's opinion. who was in charge of deciding whether to - charge of deciding whether to retrieve audit data? it charge of deciding whether to retrieve audit data?— charge of deciding whether to retrieve audit data? it would come as a request _ retrieve audit data? it would come as a request to _ retrieve audit data? it would come as a request to identify _ retrieve audit data? it would come| as a request to identify something. do you see as being responsible for the underlying data audit? it the underlying data audit? ut depends on the inquiry, when you look at the underlying data, to try and establish something, you may order the ar 0 data via the casework team or you may be requested from the solicitors as the defence require the arc) data. it's a two—way street. d0 require the arq data. it's a two-way street. , ., , require the arq data. it's a two-way street. i. , .,, require the arq data. it's a two-way street. , ., ,, street. do you see as taking responsibility _ street. do you s

_ e-mail from mr bolc, yes. it is a fair description? no, _ e-mail from mr bolc, yes.ion? no, sorry, - e-mail from mr bolc, yes. it is a fair description? no, sorry, he i fair description? no, sorry, he should have _ fair description? no, sorry, he should have been _ fair description? no, sorry, he should have been given - fair description? no, sorry, he should have been given the i should have been given the opportunity to examine the data. there was the opportunity present, but it was not taken up.— but it was not taken up. based on the e-mail. _ but it was not taken up. based on the e-mail. you _ but it was not taken up. based on the e-mail, you are _ but it was not taken up. based on the e-mail, you are correct, - but it was not taken up. based on the e-mail, you are correct, yes. | the e—mail, you are correct, yes. can we look at the final page of this witness statement? he ends the statement by saying, "i have been involved personally in a number of challenges to the integrity of the original horizon system and produced witness statements for a number of cases wh

this is an e—mail from andrew bolc himself in relation to chris branwell�*s case.eated as an expert report, in effect, about horizon, thejudge has directed your truly is with mr jenner, the author of the defence report, in the usual way between experts to identify the issues of disagreement between you." you had written a statement on this particular case that was effectively being treated as an expert's report. it depends which statement it is. i recall reading a statement which said, "i am not an expert". i would need to see this statement or they have taken the statement when i explained what we explained earlier about the machine, the screen etc, and if it's working correctly, what happens with transactions from start to finish. if they have taken that as being an expert, i'm not, i have as being an expert, i'm not, i have a working knowledge of horizon but i'm not an expert. d0 a working knowledge of horizon but i'm not an expert.— i'm not an expert. do you think it is a little odd _ i'm not an expert. do you think it is a little odd you _ i'm not an expert. d