defense and were outraged by bolhakov's ban, for example, natasha vlashchenko, tv presenter and bloggerdriy portnov, buzhanskyi. for example, this is the public, well, at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, there were rumors again that bolgakov would be banned, that the people who work in the bolgakov museum, which is located on andriivskyi uzvoz, were also very indignant, they talked about this topic, very loudly talked and closed it, and now we are opening it again, and we are talking about it... with volodymyr terishchak, deputy head of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance. mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you. good day. mr. volodymyr, tell me tell us, please, what awaits us, i have several books by bolgakov at home, i confess to you that something will happen to me, that is, someone will come to me, take these books away, they will arrest me, because they are very worried on social networks. well, let's first. i would like to clarify that in accordance with the law on the condemnation and prohibition of propaganda of russian imperial policy and the decolonization of to

streets, we must remember that bolhakov streets appeared... also only in independent ukraine, so inwell, i don't remember for sure, but at least during the rise of the soviet union, and the cult of bulgakov arose quite, quite, quite late, so to speak, so, well, in addition, it must be said that the monument to bolgakovo in kyiv appeared earlier than in russia, it reminds me of another character, leo tolstoy, who was very quarrelsome about renaming the metro station, but... there is no station in any, no place in russia and there was no leo tolstoy metro station. are we really more russian than the russians themselves? i believe that again, there is no need to resort to bans, they are superfluous, that is, it may be of interest, because many may be interested in these literary works, they can be published, if there is, there is a demand for them, but again, this has nothing to do with .. schools, it has nothing to do with toponymy, yes, maybe i would disagree about the memorial plaques, memorial plaques explain or mark places where a person has been, and again, even crime scenes have

same thing, when they say that they are destroying, they are destroying history, when they rename bolhakovtreets, we must remember that bolhakov streets also appeared only in independent ukraine, so in principle, well, i don't remember for sure, but at least well ... at such a rise of the soviet union, and the cult of bulgakov arose quite, quite, quite late, so to speak, therefore, and besides, it must be said that the monument to bolgakov in kyiv appeared earlier than in russia, it reminds me of another character, leo tolstoy, which they fought a lot about renaming the metro station, but there is no station in any, no place in russia and there was no lev tolstoy metro station, are we really that big. by russians than the russians themselves. i believe that once again, there is no need to resort to prohibitions, they are superfluous, that is, it is possible, many may be interested in these literary works, they can be published, and that there is, there is a demand for them, but again, this not related to the school, it is not related to toponymy, yes, maybe i would disagree about the memor

it's the same when they say that they are destroying, they are destroying history, when they rename bolhakoveets, we must remember that bolhakova streets appeared... also only in independent ukraine, so in principle, well, i don't remember for sure yatayu, but at least on such a rise of the soviet union, and the cult bulgakov appeared quite, quite, quite late, so to speak, so, well, in addition, it must be said that the monument to bolgakov in kyiv appeared earlier than in russia, it reminds me of another character, leo tolstoy, who is very they argued about renaming the metro station, but in... nowhere in russia there is no station and there was no leo tolstoy metro station, are we really such greater russians than the russians themselves. i believe that again, there is no need to resort to prohibitions, which are unnecessary, that is, it is possible, many may be interested in these literary works, their can be issued if they are available, there is a demand for them, but again, this has nothing to do with the school. it has nothing to do with toponymy yes maybe i would disagree about the m

ukrainian institute of national remembrance, we talked in particular about how the institute bans bolhakov's scary, well, i'll repeat it again, friends, you can treat this writer differently, so to this writer, but... institute of national remembrance didn't ban mykhailo bolgakov, you need to know this for sure, they won't take your books away, it's just about renaming streets, for example, and something like that, so if you like the texts of this author, please continue reading as before , and well, i think that it is democratic enough in our case, and in relation to the museum... personally, i would be very interested in bolgakov to go there and see how the concept of this museum will change, and how it will be rebuilt, because there are really very interesting tours there, if they remain will be just as interesting, but more objective, will tell more unpleasant truths about blogakov, i think that the museum will only win, and i also want to note an important point, says the opposition. biased position and biased vision, and if we talk about many other museums, for example, in the tychyn

different avatars that to different audiences, and so here, if we are talking specifically about bolhakove has a very clear such target audience group to which he is being promoted in ukraine, we are talking about exactly those whom you are talking about, people who have a certain level of culture, people who are quite skeptical about the soviet past, about the soviet government, but for them the culture is still largely russian culture. that is, for them, mikhail bulgakov is something the pinnacle of world culture, despite the fact that , objectively, bulgakov outside the borders of the former soviet union is , in fact, very little known, even as a writer, and for those people, another aspect that plays on their sympathies is that this is a person who lived in kyiv, this is a person who... allegedly positions, shows a different kyiv, unfortunately, there are ukrainians in our country who like this kyiv because of this, will you remember how many such signs we had sometime before 2014 , it was used in the branding of otsi ti yati and so on, kyiv is supposed to be pre-bolshevik kyiv, pre-s

the bolhakov museum did not agree with the institute's conclusions. they say that the document is not professional because it is too emotional. do you agree with this criticism? well , look, literally today i am returning from the armed forces of ukraine to the institute, and my colleagues and i will analyze the remarks and warnings that were expressed to him. in my opinion, there are really some emotional moments and maybe even some factual inaccuracy, we will check it, but the main thing a detail that is important in this discussion is whether to glorify and normalize bulgakov in the public space or not, judging by the things he wrote, what he said, it is inappropriate to glorify and normalize him, as for the book, no one bans any book, no, no museum expositions, even in the school program, he... has a dog's heart, so you know, here you have to approach this question moderately. mr. anton, in the museum they also say that quotes from various sources are often attributed to bulgakov in this document characters from the white guard novel or stories su