again, i will point out it has a power bolick moved which means you have to sell half for the companye that it comes in, but if it goes higher that's all right too. you have to sell half because it moved up way too far too fast. shauna massachusetts, sean? >> jim cramer. i enjoy you and quickly too i enjoyed -- >> he's funny. i want to talk about southwest life-sciences. what is up with visa substance? >> this one got too expensive and that's one of the reasons why i have taken it out the table. i am not paying 38 times earnings for this. i have to have some discipline and that says don't buy 38 times earnings. chandra in texas. >> booya, jim. i want to start with -- upswing [ indiscernible ] >> i like pinterest but it was at 15 now 37. too high, ring register, let it come in a little bit. sally in florida. >> hi, kramer, booya. >> thank you. what is going on? >> my question is on the research. you know, when you said something like in 2018 about writing i bought it like it was between 140 and hundred 60. >> it is up -- it is at 750. i really like to lamb back them. they merged with n

bolick legislation. and i am sitting there in my chair thinking, if i could just be up at the podium, i would just say, justice scalia, your confirmation vote was 98 to 0. drop the mike and be done with this whole supreme court litigation thing. but what the court did in in northwest austin as it did basically uphold the voting rights act, only to reverse it four years later. so that's an illustration and just of how much even before this modern court with the new justices on it, you saw changes as pretty dramatic changes in. the 2009 to 2013 period of which shelby county, i think was the most significant. now, i argued to get two more versus harper when our get when i'm arguing a constitutional case, i am willing to use any method of constitutional interpretation to try and appeal to the different camps on the court. but if i have an original last argument, that's where i want to be, because that is where right now the gravity of the court is about the original understanding of the constitution. so more