then she said this, this is margaret sanger and bolshevik russia. theoretically there are no obstacles to birth control in russia. it is accepted on the grounds of health and human rights. we, america, could well take example from russia, the soviet union, 1934, on the verge of the great purge. we could take example from russia, the founder of planned parenthood weather are no legal restrictions, nowhere does condemnation and birth control instruction in this part of the regular welfare service of the government. that is where we are in america. birth control instruction as part of the regular wealth and service of the government, no legal restriction, no religious condemnation and if you don't support birth control being part of the regular welfare service of the government you troglodytes you favorite--favor a war on women. we are 80 years behind what she sought in bolshevik russia. she said this. on abortion she was however to her credit she was aghast at the number of abortions she was seeing in moscow. this was horrible. she said this. the tota

abortion got so bad a bolshevik russia stolid interfered he said we will not have a population and by the way you should see he is reprimanded by trotsky you cannot be a good, but is to abolish abortion. what are you doing? buddies and we will not have a population of this keeps up than stalin dies eventually replaced by khrushchev one of the first things he did is to bring back a portion so by the late '60s one confined soviet women who had as many as 20 abortions and by the '70s the u.s.s.r. was averaging between seven and 8 million abortions per year between seven and 8 million per year. bayadere 2050 there is a great piece of this russia is looking at a population plunged that they attribute of to abortion and abortion induced infertility and vladimir putin is the first major limits on abortion and in decades because he realizes this hurts the population even the national fertility rates. margaret sanger i have a of a chapter in the book the founder of planned parenthood which began as then abc al the american birth control league i call them progresses george bernard shaw margare

first of the war, and then of the bolshevik revolution, which happens later on in 1917.any people who did not become socialists avoided the draft. if you did not register you could try to hide out. by 1918 the country is engaging in what they call slacker rates. -- slacker rates. if you are not register when you were supposed to, you are considered a slacker. the federal government went and rounded people up relatively , indiscriminately and tried to see who was actually registering and who wasn't. number ofe were a people who were prosecuted under this law, how specifically did he make his way through the court system? tom he challenge the : constitutionality which was at the time a relatively unusual thing. because the first amendment , didn't have a lot of teeth at this point. he goes to trial and is convicted. >> in what court? tom: and a little court and i think pennsylvania. he then is -- because he challenges the constitutionality of the law at that time unlike now he could take his case straight to the supreme court alleging that it was unconstitutional. it set u

and he ends up fleeing to russia and kind of hiding out with the bolsheviks.the first world war that everyone needs to be mobilized on behalf of the war. i think if you look at the supreme court's records they understood themselves -- they might not have articulated it that way but they understood themselves as being in some way part of that national effort. and i think it's important to remember that it's often said of military generals that they're fighting the last war. well, for someone like oliver wendell holmes, the civil war was a living memory. for many americans at this moment it was a living memory to them. it was vietnam to us. right about a 50-year time span. they really are thinking about what social dislocation looks like, what the experience of total war is like. and they actually have some very present memory of that. >> the one thing that is very interesting, as committed as holmes is in schenck, later in 1919 he starts to get off the train and dissents for the first time in one of these cases. i think is increasingly coming to the conclusion

after world war ii we were fearful of socialism and bolsheviks.ory shows that most of the fears were overblown. this is a business station, you know when there's a financial crisis, you usually advise people don't act out of fear, out of panic, out of significig. that's often what people do and we like to present the picture that everybody blended together. but they don't, that's why we have chinatown and little italy and germantown and koreatown. >> but they all assimilated much more so then than now, right? >> i don't know that that's true. there's, that's kind of the myth. but every generation has had -- >> my forbearers, they learned the language. >> they had to. >> they were indoctrinated, they were good welders and good with stone and good with construction they brought an added value to our country. >> we had to have a group called the knights of columbus, created in this country in new haven, connecticut, to defend and protect the rights of mostly irish and italian immigrants in the lerl i 20th century. >> you're right. what can we learn t

addition to that, the germans were allies with the lithuanians in their hatred of what they call the bolshevikws and there was the completion of communism and the judaism that they proved they were utterly untrue in fact right before the beginning of the war statistically the number of the judicious in on communist party was far greater than the number of jews who were in the communist party. so, as one of the survivors from this getaway interviewed over several years. it was also a deadly rationale if you will for ridding lithuania of the jewish population once and for all and my grandfather as it turned out certainly shared the view that all her communist and they were in the words of one of his daughters and the scapegoats. so take a look at this whereas many times over five years and where and they worked from 1941 to 43 so here is the beautiful green as it exists today. it is a place to do this to be of course full of jewish life, a place of synagogues. now it's lovely but it's empty. you can't see it but the catholic church that my mother went to when she was a child living there is just

to that, the germans were allies with the lithuanians, in they're hatred of what they called the bolshevik jews, and i'm hear many of you heard of this. a conflation of communism and judism, that the statistics in lithuania proved were it arely untrue. in fact right before the beginning of the war, statistically on paper, the number of nonjewish lithuanians who are members of the communist party was far greater than the number of jews who were in the communist party. so, as one of the survivors from the ghetto, i interviewed over several years, said to me, even as a cried growing up she was familiar with the phrase, kill a jew, save russia. the myth of the communist jew, while not a complete fiction, was a deadly rationale, if you will, for ridding lithuania of the jewish population once and for all. and my grandfather as it turned out certainly shared the view that all jews were communists, and they were in the words of one of his daughters, his scapegoat. but let's take a brief look at the town where i was many times over five years and where he worked from 1941 to 1943. so here is the b

addition to that, the germans were allies with the lithuanians and their hatred of what they called the bolsheviks. i'm sure many of you have heard of this. it was a conflation of communism in judaism that the statistics in lithuania proof were utterly untrue. in fact, right before the beginning of the war statistically on paper, the number of non-jewish lithuanians were members of the communist party is far greater than the number of jews who were in the communist party. so as one of the survivors of the ghetto i interviewed over several years said to me, even as a child child growing up she was familiar with the phrase, tillage use save russia. the myth of the communists won not complete fiction was kind of a deadly rationale if you will. for ridding the jewish population once and for all. my grandfather, as it turns out certainly shared the view that all jews were communists, in the words of one of his daughters his scapegoat. but let's take a brief look at the place right was many times over five years and where he worked from 1941 to 1943. here is the beautiful town as it exists today. it is

to draw an analogy with soviet communism, it went from the intellectualism of marx to the bolshevik ofn and desended to the brutality of stalin and what happened with islamic extremism. it started very high end the course of the last two decades, pseudointellectualism, a desire to bring about intellectual utopia and descended as-to-a point, as happens with all dogma, to a point where it has basically become militarized, become all about the action, implementing the ideology as opposed to talking about it as it used to be when i joined and now, what -- the action-orientated focus of this ideology, the people that sort of find that appealing are people that have petty criminal record, the people prepared already psychologically to break the law and absolutely, it's spot on what we have heard from clarissa, they are looking for a cause, a sense of belonging and this ideological far this ratty they eventually end up subscribing to, i call it the islamic ideology provides them that sense of belonging, provides them this higher cause to aspire to and makes them feel better about their own, p

that debate reflected a debate between the bolsheviks and the menchavicks. nobody watching at home believes that any of the moderators have any intention of voting in a republican primer. plimary. the questions being asked shouldn't be trying to get people to tear into each other, it should be what are your substantive solutions to -- >> i asked you about the debt limit and got no answer. >> you want me to answer that? i'm happy to answer the question. let me tell you how the question -- >> we're moving on. >> senator paul, i have a question for you. >> you don't actually want to hear the answer, john? >> you used your time on something else. senator paul. >> you're not interested in an answer. >> i'm interested in an answer from senator paul. >> senator paul, the budget deal crafted by speaker john boehner and passed by the house today makes cuts in entitlement programs, medicare and social security disability which are the very programs conservatives say need cutting to shrink government and solve our country's long-term budget deficit. do you oppose that