in in january, the border rights initiative published a report on the systematic obstruction of migrantseu borders, alleging violations. mexico and texas. find the differences. the american civil rights union provides frankly frightening statistics. every year , the us authorities keep hundreds of thousands of people in a special detention center and it is not a resort. some of the people detained include asylum seekers, long-term residents, children and people with disabilities, sometimes. detained for months or years, while their immigration cases and any subsequent appeals are pending. immigrant detention facilities in the united states continue to suffer from inhumane conditions, including the excessive use of solitary confinement and sexual assault. in holding cells in border patrol detention facilities along the u.s. border, adults and unaccompanied children have been subjected to violence, harassment and abuse. treatment. let's say it again, belarus provided the refugees with food, blood and some kind of housing. americans, violence, bullying. and let’s not forget that people fled

right next to china. it has, you know, thousands over a 1000 miles of border with china. and when barcode bama initiated the pivot to asia, grandma became incredibly important. they needed to pull them off into the us or that in order to use it as a bulwark against china. and also to prevent china from developing its belt and rode out into the indian ocean through capsule port. and so they strongly and very actively courted on some sushi was, you know, at the, at that time, the deposed leader of the country, the post civilian leader of the country. uh. and then uh, essentially through a series of pressure and negotiations, they were able to create a co habitation between ounce on sushi and the military government. the military junta that had controlled the country for decades. what happened later was the, i'll sensory chee instead of going along with the us plan. she started to do her own rock prussia mall with china in particular, authorizing scores of mountain road projects through me and my especially through right kind state. when that happened, she lost favor with the us ruling elite, and then her

right next to china. it has, you know, thousands over 1000 miles of border with china. and when barcode bama initiated the pivot to asia on the, on my became incredibly important. they needed to pull me out more into the us or that in order to use it as a bulwark against china. and also to present china from developing its belt and rode out into the indian ocean through capital port. and so they strongly and very actively courted uh, some sushi was, you know, at the, at that time the deposed leader of the country, the post civilian leader of the country. uh. and then uh, essentially through a series of pressure and negotiations, they were able to create a co habitation between ounce on sushi and the military government, the military junta that had controlled the country for decades. uh, what happened later was the, uh, sensor chee, instead of going along with the us plan. uh, she started to do her own rock prussia mall with china in particular, authorizing uh, scores of belt and road projects through myanmar, especially through rock kind state. when that happened, she lost safer with the us ruling lea

it sort of initiated the whole process of notarizing, the border for instance. and so even then, it was sort of a, a compromise, right? but the republican party is that exist under donald trump is not interested in a compromise of any kind that would offer a legal status. for instance, the people who don't have it. um, democrats, you know, they really have not oppose this in a way they're running scared on, you know, when biting proposes compromise that you referred to earlier. and i think is main reason for doing that was to try to kind of blunt the attack of, of drugs and extreme. um republicans on that said the biting is soft on migration. so instead of really providing a real principle, the fierce defense of the rights of migrants and the rights of working people in general, what he did was, he said, well, i'm gonna, i'll do, you know, i'm going to close the border on that's not something that kind of stops the republicans in their tracks. if anything, it give some even more momentum. i'd say, david, tell us about these actions by the governor of texas, greg abbott, to you serve some of the federal government's a

it sort of initiated the whole process of notarizing the border for instance. so even then, um it was sort of a, a compromise. right? but the republican party is that exist under donald trump is not interested in a compromise of any kind that would offer legal status. for instance, the people who don't have it. um, democrats, you know, they really have not opposed to us in a way they're running scared on, you know, when biting proposes compromise that you referred to earlier on. i think his main reason for doing that was to try to kind of blunt the attack of, of drugs and extreme republicans on that said the biting is soft of migration. so instead of really providing a real principle that a fierce defense of the rights of migrants and the rights of working people in general, what he did was, he said, well, i'm gonna, i'll do, you know, i'm going to close now the border. that's not something that kind of stops the republicans in their tracks. if anything, it gives some even more, more enter my check. david, tell us about these actions by the governor of texas, greg abbott, to you serve some of the federal government

pete: they're talking right now in the white house executive orders changing the definition of asylum and walking into the border, claim asylum and that initial claim could be rejected and it's effectively the trump policy. because what's coming up, everybody? there's a pesky little election coming up and immigration is a huge topic and he's been on the wrong side the entire time. >> china is going to eat our lunch? come on, man. they can't figure out how to deal with the corruption in the system. they're not bad folks, folks. will: not not bad folks, folks. pete: this is 2019 joe. remember, the biden family was making a lot of deal withs china in ukraine around the globe. splits from 2020 democrats on abortion measure. >> height appointments and i had to look it up too. just to emphasize it, federal funding of abortion except in a few small cases. this is primary time. the democratic process. june 5, 2019. pete: june 6, 2019. the tune changed. watch. >> if i believe healthcare is a right as i dorks i can no longer support an amendment that makes that right dependent on someone's zip code. picker i'm now running for president of the democrati

involved was illegally crossed the border last month in april in the san diego sector, the epicenter of the crisis right now. he was released on notice to appear no initial derogatory information and other jordanian national was f1 student visa overstay, neither have a criminal history in the u.s. and they are withholding their identity. they are,a waiting removal proceedings. according to statement, jordanians told officers they were working for an amazon subcontractor and fox confirmed with amazon, they have no knowledge of the two jordanians working for them. this is on heels of lindsay graham's letter to mayorkas demanding information including immigration files. >> you have two fighting-age males from mideast trying to lie their way and falsify their way into a marine base, if that doesn't bother you, what would? were these two on the terrorist watch list? why did they want on marine corps base pretending to be something they are not. >> griff: no weapons were found in the box truck and no information suggesting terror related motives surfaced, unclear how the two connected and what they were doing there. youngkin wants answers. -- sector over a tho

it lou denials at the initial screen stage at the border rather than during the interview stage. so, in other words, the border patrol could turn somebody around, rightt the border, right? >> no. no. look, if they are denied by sphor r. officer on the border legal right to appeal to immigration judge. this is about approving them quickly. more quickly and releasing them and getting into the united states. i don't trust this administration. all they got to do is apply the law that's on the books. catch and release. keeping detention and immigration judge hear the case within 35 days. you want a quick hearing? hold them in detention. that's what you are supposed to do. that's what federal law requires you to do. now they are ignoring the law. not only ignoring the law, breaking the law. >> i would have thought the administration, given the fact they are under water on this come up with something that's going to stop the flow but this is going to make it worse. >> continue lying to the american people. i have never seen anything like this. they are not apologizing and not ashamed of it and they are going to keep doing it. >> steve: gives us something to

and israel's initial action to get back its hostages, was completelyjustified and it has a right to protect its borders do you go, and where, and even within israel, there is criticism and there've always been critics of netanyahu, many of them families of the hostages that have been critical of what he's done, and the question now is you cheered that clip of president biden saying, will this constitute a redline for the americans with mike in the past, when the americans have this expressed displeasure with israel, israel has followed on from what the americans have wanted, but on this occasion israel has not done it, and that i find very interesting, and maybe that is a complete change in policy on the part of the israeli government that it can defy what america wants and still carry on and what it believes is right. itrefoil america wants and still carry on and what it believes is right.— what it believes is right. we'll see whetherthis _ what it believes is right. we'll see whether this is _ what it believes is right. we'll see whether this is a _ what it believes is right. we'll see whether this i

sending military personnel there, initially they said that they would supposedly stand on the border with belarus and relieve ukrainian troops will either stand on the rightroops and our troops, but most likely the fifth article will not be involved, but we see that some western politicians and military personnel, or rather commanders, are there. in a kind of frenzy, that now they will send everything and decide everything, so for this purpose, these are our exercises of non-strategic nuclear forces, which we last carried out back in the days of the soviet union. on the one hand, this is a check of the nuclear arsenal, an updated nuclear arsenal, because along with strategic nuclear weapons , tactical operational-tactical weapons were also updated - nuclear weapons, which in principle need to be tested, need to be checked. while we are members, well, we support the treaty banning nuclear tests in all environments, so rather only blanks will fly, but they will be exactly the same, we also have strategic nuclear weapons, but this will be a clear signal, maybe we’ll even invite the military hatashe, show these samples, tell them, so that it will reach some h