determinations of raising the ceiling for expenditures which we all agreed was an unnecessarily lab boria imposition on staff and unnecessary for protecting the public's interest, i would be in favor of focusing on that first ordinance and waiting the hearing in december on the penalty ordinance issue if there is an interest in doing that. >> i think the draft ordinance that appears as add attachment two. attachment one are regulations. i don't believe the city attorney's office raised red flags about the regulations. if you want to move ahead with regulations that would not be a closed session. as for the ordinance, i will ask the city attorney, deputy city attorney. i think only the third of the recommendations in the memo are what it is focused on total supportive funds to expenditures rather than contributions. i am not sure if you are suggesting, commissioner ambrose, we remove that and move ahead with the other recommendations or if you are referring only to the regulation that are attachment one. >> commissioner ambrose: i am asking the question. i wasn't clear on what we needed fu