boris in the past. anand i am interested — boris in the past. anand i am interested in _ boris in the past. t strategy is. it to criticise - i wonder what that strategy is-_ to criticise - i wonder what that strate: is. ,, , ., strategy is. it makes sense for him to come out _ strategy is. it makes sense for him to come out and _ strategy is. it makes sense for him to come out and criticise, - strategy is. it makes sense for him to come out and criticise, because| strategy is. it makes sense for him | to come out and criticise, because i think it would be remiss of him not to hit the big news programmes tonight with a reminder he is there as an alternative to borisjohnson. what would be interesting moving forward is the degree to which he is successful at trying to sow disaffection, touching on the question that divide the tories, in the hope of fighting amongst themselves. when he needs to try avoid doing is uniting them in their dislike of him, because i would like to boris johnson's dislike of him, because i would like to borisjohnson's hands. labour needs to find a way both to point to t

boris maksudov is working. he goes directly to the studio . boris welcome, what is happening in the city at this moment, what are the consequences of today's shelling? alexander greetings today in donetsk again smoke from fires just 20 minutes ago , ukrainian artillery fired eight shells of 155 mm caliber. those same nato shells are deadly gifts from the united states for the ukrainian army. if, uh, in donetsk itself over the past two days, we have observed such a relative relative low intensity of shelling. uh, of course, it doesn’t make it easier for residents that the northern parts of the dpr and the city are still under the gunpoint of ukrainian artillery, the village of golmovsky along makeevka along hay on gorlovka beat almost without ceasing, but it was donetsk donetsk was such a small respite. although, of course, from this respite, shells fly not much easier for residents, maybe less often, but the larger caliber, the more terrible weapons, and more and more often these shells are directed against unprotected civilians and civilian objects. in what conditions do residents have to live ? we talked to those who just yesterday were under fire. let's listen. and i got up while throwing it off. what are you, grandfather threw off something there, how looked. that's all. that's already half. come out if yesterday the whole day was pulled out very scary. this can not even be said to the patient's husband. here with him, as i am all these good people, they dragged him into the basement with kindness today they brought tea. ukrainians are fighting, and hurricanes are hitting uh with american shells. in general, uh, the city of donetsk is now in full view of practically ukrainian artillery, but we can say that over the past 2 days, the intensity, as i said, uh, has decreased . the thing is that, finally, for a lot over the past for 3 weeks, for the first time here in the sky, aircraft of the russian aerospace forces saw helicopters, which today headed towards avdiivka, apparently. uh, apparently, ukrainian positions were attacked, but it only cost now by plane. uh, their work will end, as right there, the kiev region was under the gunpoint of ukrainian artillery, that is, they use every opportunity at any time. that's what we talked to the head of the city. let's listen to the number of shelling is measured in hundreds, the number of shells fired, in my opinion, is measured in 1,000. the shelling beats on the populated rushed because of the construction site. we are now stating a fact, for some other new weapon that carries is changing. huge destruction every minute, we use the lull in order for all services to go to each one at their own facility and, uh, adjust the operation of the system in such a way as to supply energy and water and all the necessary communications. after yesterday 's shelling, there were 18 wounded who died, and today it is already known that after such seemingly not quite intense shelling, people still suffer let me remind you that in 3 months 188 civilians died at the hands of ukrainian artillery, this, of course, is a sad statistic. it only grows every day. well, what do the residents themselves think about this, who live here under such incessant artillery shelling. let's listen. they have the same principle. they also need to intimidate us, we need to destroy it. well, how is the logic of the terrorists. this is the logic of cowards. it's the logic of cowards, the more you try to scare us, the more you think you're cornering us no, wrong guys. the authorities of the dpr promise that in the near future the shelling of donetsk will stop, what , together with the residents, is very much this, we are waiting for colleagues. thank you borisoris from here with the latest information about the situation in the donetsk people's republic, the fire on the drilling platform of the chernomorneftegaz, which suffered from shelling from ukraine , continues, this was reported by senator olga from crimea, criticizing, according to her, the fire was on fire at night. i approached the well, and the day before i went along the platforms in the black sea . inflicted three blows, the investigators filed criminal case. the search operation continues on the spot. seven people are listed as missing with the platform evacuated 90 four people. three people are in a hospital in simferopol and their condition is assessed by doctors as moderately severe. the publication in washington reported that another american mercenary died in ukraine, according to the newspaper, his name was steven zabelski, and he was 52 years old. these data have already been confirmed by the state department. at the same time, tell us more about the circumstances of dea

boris _ styles. the way in which i would go for boris is — styles. the way in which i would go for borisor boris is probably slightly different— for boris is probably slightly different to _ for boris is probably slightly different to how— for boris is probably slightly different to how he - for boris is probably slightly different to how he does i for boris is probably slightly different to how he does it. | for boris is probably slightly - different to how he does it. some people _ different to how he does it. some people don't— different to how he does it. some people don't like _ different to how he does it. some people don't like my— different to how he does it. some people don't like my style - different to how he does it. some people don't like my style and i different to how he does it. some i people don't like my style and other people _ people don't like my style and other people don't— people don't like my style and other people don't like _ people don't like my style and other people don't like keir— people don't like my style and other people don't like keir starmer- people

boris johnson denies lying _ countrywide thing. boris johnson denies lying about _ countrywide thing. borisnson | denies lying about the parties and downing reed street. he said some things that were wrong, but he thought they were true. you must have had a few days this week talking to francis, people who are ardent royalist, all four days of the festivities to see people in their respect they have for the individual, it seems that boris johnson is damaged goods. i think that was used by keir starmer. but he thinks he can win another election. the question is what does it take to resign? when you see that the anti—corruption tsar, john penrose, the mother of all democracies, what is the future? i can think of french politics 25 years ago where affairs were very common. if an equivalent was found out about the uk, it would be much more serious. how do you think french people are seeing boris johnson? do they see him as a man who delivered brexit, or as a politician with greater breadth? aha, politician with greater breadth? -— often what is politician with greater breadth? —— often what is

boris johnson?- reality for boris johnson? yes. i think the _ reality for boris johnson? yes. for boris johnson? yes. i think the conservative mps, i i think the conservative mps, those who voted against boris johnson would still be putting pressure upon them to stand out and say look, this situation is untenable. the parliamentary party is really debated in half. as to whether the back you and therefore you cannot carry on as conservative party leader, you need to step aside. but the message coming back loud and clear from but the message coming back loud and clearfrom boris johnson and his friends this evening is low, i have won under the rules of the game, i'm entitled to carry on as leader. you cannot challenge me again for another year and it is now time to forget what is going on in the past and move forward. borisjohnson will try to reshape the political agenda in his direction. you can hold on until a parliamentary recess, he has a chance. the difficulty he has is that issues such as his conduct in 10 downing street, the so—called party gate affair, the psychological w

boris. ii country move forward with or without boris. ., , ., ., ., ., boris. thout him, who would you . boris. if it was to move forward | without him, who would you like boris. if it was to move forward - without him, who would you like to see replace him?— see replace him? steve baker, no question- why? — see replace him? steve baker, no question. why? i— see replace him? steve baker, no question. why? i think _ see replace him? steve baker, no question. why? i think he's - see replace him? steve baker, no question. why? i think he's a - see replace him? steve baker, noj question. why? i think he's a man see replace him? steve baker, no i question. why? i think he's a man of intehri . i question. why? i think he's a man of integrity- i like _ question. why? i think he's a man of integrity. i like the _ question. why? i think he's a man of integrity. i like the way _ question. why? i think he's a man of integrity. i like the way you voted during the pandemic and how he spoke about things to stand against mandates, to stand against passports, and i think based

boris johnson _ west yorkshire. i don't trust boris johnson at _ west yorkshire. i don't trust borisoris johnson at all. i - west yorkshire. i don't trust boris johnson at all. i thinkl borisjohnson at all. i think what he's been doing recently is just terrible. i what he's been doing recently is just terrible.— isjust terrible. i think he's been incredibly _ isjust terrible. i think he's been incredibly unlucky. . isjust terrible. i think he's l been incredibly unlucky. and now — been incredibly unlucky. and now it — been incredibly unlucky. and now it would appear that his own— now it would appear that his own team are out to get him. the _ own team are out to get him. the opposition parties are delighted. the opposition parties are delighted-— the opposition parties are deliahted. , , . delighted. this is catastrophic for the prime _ delighted. this is catastrophic for the prime minister, - delighted. this is catastrophic for the prime minister, but i l for the prime minister, but i think whars— for the prime minister, but i think what's more _ for the prime minister, but ll think

boris ivanin. hello boris. tell us what was discussed and what other statements the minister made. yes alexander greetings, but now only the official part of the meeting of the ministers of foreign affairs of the csto countries, which took place in the presidential palace in yerevan, uh, now is the time for informal communication. however, the issues are still the same, these are different aspects, international and regional security of the capital of armenia, which is currently chairing the csto. hey ministers. six countries discussed, uh, a lot of issues. uh. at first, the meetings were held in a narrow format behind closed doors, then in an expanded round table, and delegations from all the states included in the wsc also gathered there, as a result of these meetings, a number of important documents were signed sergey lavrov spoke about this in detail we adopted, i think, a very important statement on international security issues, which for the first time within the framework of the cst enshrines the principle of the indivisibility of security, the need to ensure an equal week for him and security when no country strengthens its security at the expense of the security of any other country - this is a crisis response within the framework of the organization of the collective security treaty, let me remind you that in 2009 . for example, the russian peacekeepers managed to stop violent clashes in nagorny karabakh and in january 2022, the forces were sent to normalize the situation in kazakhstan at the request of the authorities of this country, when the republic was engulfed in riots and clashes between protesters and government forces, but in the perspective of organizing a collective security treaty. it should become a factor that would regulate the balance of interests in the entire euro-atlantic area , the minister of foreign affairs said. sergey lavrov spoke quite recently in his interview for the anniversary of the csto this year, as the organization notes its twentieth anniversary, but we asked sergey lavrov what exactly he had in mind, what measures the csto intends to achieve this goal. here is what the minister told us. states have qualities. uh, as from the point of view of the uh states themselves, which are part of this or that military-political alliance, in terms of the defensive capabilities that exist, we have repeatedly offered our colleagues from nato on behalf of the csd. e many years ago. for the first time, this was done at the level of the main state at the level of foreign ministers, offered to start a dialogue to establish mechanisms for interaction between nato consultations, arrogantly refused, but the fact that they cannot decide the fate of europe, i think everyone has already become aware. well , that is, it is clear that in the future the csto should become such a balance of interests for nato countries throughout the euro-atlantic region, the head of the russian foreign ministry also commented on the last words and actions from poland and ukraine, kiev imposed a number of sanctions against the russian authorities. in particular , personal restrictions were imposed against russian leader vladimir putin and against the minister himself. sergey lavrov well, what did he say, he answered this. no action is not worthy of any, but reciprocal steps from moscow, uh, the head of the russian foreign ministry briefly commented and added with a chuckle. no matter how the child was amused, sergey lavrov also answered in absentia to the words of the polish president, andrzej edouard, who went even further and compared. e, vladimir putin with hitler and also said that france and germany supposedly should not have communicated with the president of russia in order to achieve peace in ukraine sergey lavrov speaking of these attacks from warsaw, he first of all advised the polish authorities to history. well , when did you answer this question? at first, he even asked, grinning, whom to whom who compares i am not compared to anyone by ribbentrops, while we see that behind the talk about the inadmissibility of which dialogue with russia, the polish colleagues are beginning to actively develop ukrainian territory, chancellor merkel at one time and president macron expressed very serious frustrated action. e of the european union russophists who blocked the initiative of france germany, uh, about holding an eu summit with president putin, and you need to dance the tango together, in the meantime, our western partners are doing break dancing. well, returning to the substantive part of the meeting in yerevan, the problems of regional international security, the minister of foreign affairs of the csto countries continued to discuss with the prime minister of armenia nikol pashinyan, who, by the way, is the chairman of the csto council. uh, but there are so many topics for discussion that the work schedule is not enough for everything. uh, so that you have to have these conversations, even for lunch that is going on now, but this is also face to face alexander yes, thanks borisis ivanin on the outcome of the meeting of the council of ministers of foreign affairs of the strange dkb and on the statements of the head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs in ukraine stuffing regular fakes, where is the truth, where is the lie understood by vitaly arutyunyan comedy the sbu presents a new episode of intercepted conversations, which are actually mounted on the knees of the security service of ukraine, do not cease to be disgraced and publishes negotiations allegedly of the russian military now. a legend invented not by the most adequate author consists in the fact that they were going to drive the captured ukrainian warriors around mariupol in order to clear it, in fact, another recording with a ukrainian accent, where his interlocutors, among other things, spit their tongues, it seems that there is a moment when the city of mariupol or someone else helps you to clear mines in in a natural way, or detained in the trenches somewhere, decide on litopol. no, it w

boris johnson is following in them. but because — boris johnson is following in them. but because he _ boris because he is not even- boris johnson is following in them. but because he is not even done i borisjohnson is following in them. | but because he is not even done as well as— but because he is not even done as well as theresa _ but because he is not even done as well as theresa may— but because he is not even done as well as theresa may did _ but because he is not even done as well as theresa may did back- but because he is not even done as well as theresa may did back in - well as theresa may did back in 2018. _ well as theresa may did back in 2018. that _ well as theresa may did back in 2018, that makes _ well as theresa may did back in 2018, that makes the _ well as theresa may did back in 2018, that makes the scale - well as theresa may did back in 2018, that makes the scale of. well as theresa may did back in l 2018, that makes the scale of this even worse — 2018, that makes the scale of this even worse so— 2018, that makes the scale of this even worse. so that _ 2018, that makes

what is so odd about it is that boris johnson was not a i it is that boris johnson was not a very— it is that boris. i think even _ very good foreign secretary. i think even those — very good foreign secretary. i think even those close to him would admit that, so— even those close to him would admit that, so we _ even those close to him would admit that, so we are in a strange thing that, so we are in a strange thing that we _ that, so we are in a strange thing that we have decided to work this is his strength suddenly when it was not when — his strength suddenly when it was not when he was actually in that role, _ not when he was actually in that role so — not when he was actually in that role, so strong on foreign policy and this— role, so strong on foreign policy and this is— role, so strong on foreign policy and this is a way to look like a leader— and this is a way to look like a leader i think i should be, this churchiii— leader i think i should be, this churchill type figure. when asked for the _ churchill type figure. when asked for the problems at home are so substantial, most of the front

boris johnson's _ mind? there will be boris johnson's opponents - mind? there will be boris johnson's opponents who | mind? er johnson�*s opponents who rather wish they had waited because i am pretty sure had they waited and we had these results, we would be looking at a no—confidence vote on boris johnson first thing on monday morning and it would be hard to maintain he is a vote winner because there is now substantial evidence he no longer is. what a transformation from a year ago when they were winning a by—election. it is damaging for borisjohnson in particular because for many people in the conservative party, it was i was a transactional government. getting brexit done. that he was uniquely able to get part of the electorate other conservatives cannot. the idea he can no longer do so, is very diminishing for his overall authority. diminishing for his overall authority-— diminishing for his overall authority. you talk about a pathway — authority. you talk about a pathway for _ authority. you talk about a pathway for the _ authority. you talk about a i pathway for the conservatives to lose a majority bu

boris johnson. what did ou make has been to boris johnson. what did you make of — has been to boris johnson. _ has been to boris johnson. what did you make ofjeremy hunt saying - has been to boris johnson. what did you make ofjeremy hunt saying he | you make ofjeremy hunt saying he would vote against, april work for secretary who stood against boris johnson in 2019 but is much more towards the centre of the party that many of the mp5 who have voted today? many of the mps who have voted toda ? ~ . . ~ many of the mps who have voted toda ? ~ ., ., ,, ., , , today? what i make of it is he is ”uttin today? what i make of it is he is putting his _ today? what i make of it is he is putting his hat — today? what i make of it is he is putting his hat in _ today? what i make of it is he is putting his hat in the _ today? what i make of it is he is putting his hat in the ring - today? what i make of it is he is putting his hat in the ring but. putting his hat in the ring but actuatty~~~ _ putting his hat in the ring but actually- - -_ putting his hat in the ring but actuall...�* .,y , actually... but

boris johnson? i think boris has two _ and vote for boris johnson? son? i think boris has two years to _ and vote for boris johnson? i think boris has two years to turn - and vote for boris johnson? i think boris has two years to turn it i boris has two years to turn it round, he is a great campaigner, if he turns it round in two years then maybe some mps can go back and say you know, i've got it wrong, let's move forward.— you know, i've got it wrong, let's move forward. ., ., ., , move forward. you are a very divided .a l move forward. you are a very divided party. nadeem _ move forward. you are a very divided party, nadeem doris _ move forward. you are a very divided party, nadeem doris castigated i party, nadeem doris castigated jeremy hunt on twitter. i party, nadeem doris castigated jeremy hunt on twitter.- party, nadeem doris castigated jeremy hunt on twitter. i think we need to come _ jeremy hunt on twitter. i think we need to come together, _ jeremy hunt on twitter. i think we need to come together, i - jeremy hunt on twitter. i think we need

boris ivanin, who knows the details of these negotiations, is in touch. boris hello. tell us with whom you are planning. today's meeting and what topics will be the main ones. yes, tatyana greetings , we are now in the so-called diplomatic quarter of tehran, this whole complex of buildings, because now, if possible, the operator can show all these buildings belong to the ministry of foreign affairs of the islamic republic and it is here that the meeting of the russian foreign minister will be held today. sergey lavrov of his iranian colleague, host amir abdukhin, the conversation itself will begin in about hour and a half. at first she will go behind closed doors, but only then both ministers will go out to the press and answer journalists' questions. now they are just gathering near the entrance to one of the buildings of this complex. in the meantime, reporters. and in particular, the iranian press is discussing, uh, the details of the meeting between sergei lavrov and iranian president ibrahim raisi, which took place the day before. and now i will even show some iranian publications, and photos from this meeting from the presidential palace, but are published by the government newspaper iran and so on. here, if you look at the full page of the portrait of our minister sergey lavrov and the title, i will translate tehran and moscow together oppose western sanctions, but indeed this opposition has become one of the main topics of the meetings. uh, the main topics of the meetings the day before. e, sergey lavrova ibrahima raisib. this was the first meeting since he became the head of state in august last year in terms of the number of restrictions imposed on our country, russia has already overtaken iran, which has long accumulated certain economic experience, which may well share just the expansion and strengthening of economic cooperation was discussed the day before to meet the minister of foreign affairs. russian president of iran sergey lavrov also conveyed warm words and wishes to ibrahim gross from russian president vladimir putin, whom i remind gross met, and personally in the kremlin in january of this year. best wishes he looks forward to new meetings with you in all e countries that are negatively influenced by selfish lines. us investing arises objective necessity, but economic ties will be reconfigured. in some way, our laws do not depend on the cause, that just such an economic reconfiguration is the counteraction of the western rhetoric of the western station - this is the key agenda. all meetings. sergei lavrov is here tehran is another building - this is the leading systemic opposition publication of the islamic republic, which also puts a photo of sergei lavrov on the front page and writes, but the purpose of this visit, more precisely. there is only one visit, but the goals of this trip will be discussed several times, including iranian nuclear program. the west really wants to return its parameters, although it itself terminated, uh, the deal with the stroke of donald trump's pen, but the parties also plan to discuss security issues in the region, this situation in syria, afghanistan, yemen, and issues will also be raised in the caspian cooperation and separately the situation in ukraine, here's another edition. iran writes. uh, headline west to spread lies about the causes of the world food crisis with reference to ours, but the official representative of the russian metamaria zakharov who, too. uh, today i'm here to make up delegations in tehran. so the situation in ukraine , the issue of the export of ukrainian grain from the ports will also be discussed here at the minister's meetings. sergei lavrov we are looking forward to these meetings. we are waiting for details. thank you tatyana borisris ivanin spoke about the upcoming negotiations of the head of our diplomacy earlier. the author of the host of the evening with vladimir solovyov explained to his italian colleague why our troops are participating in a special operation in ukraine and why nato countries they make the mistake of supporting the kiev regime, the conversation took place during vladimir solovyov's blacklist, unsuccessfully trying to discredit the air before the italian television audience. watched by anastasia efimova it was a condition of rome, two of the most popular political shows in russia and italy, an evening with vladimir solovyov and a portaporta translated from door to door with bruno spa in a direct dialogue without editing and banknotes vladimir solovyov television and war propaganda or truth delivered directly to the monitors of the italian tv studios. the question is far from the most difficult of those voiced in this dialogue know that this division during the second century of the patrioti

boris — vision for it. she had a clique. boris is — vision for it. she had a clique. borisit will be quite hard for mps to say. _ think it will be quite hard for mps to say. yes. — think it will be quite hard for mps to say, yes, we do have that faith. there _ to say, yes, we do have that faith. there is— to say, yes, we do have that faith. there is a — to say, yes, we do have that faith. there is a slim possibility that he is a friendless man and he could 'ust is a friendless man and he could just go — is a friendless man and he could 'ust io. :, ~' , is a friendless man and he could 'ust io. :, ,, y:, , : just go. ok, thank you very much. thank you — just go. ok, thank you very much. thank you for— just go. ok, thank you very much. thank you for talking _ just go. ok, thank you very much. thank you for talking to _ just go. ok, thank you very much. thank you for talking to us. - looking at the weather picture this afternoon, we have a mixture around. some of you will see some sunshine, glorious start across western scotland to northern ireland, and also south—west england

boris johnson. yes, _ imminent threat to boris johnson. yes. if— imminent threat to boris johnson. if labourand the liberal democrats back up these receipts, it will he _ democrats back up these receipts, it will be another head something else for conservative mps to chew over us to consider— for conservative mps to chew over us to consider weather their seats will be safe _ to consider weather their seats will be safe in— to consider weather their seats will be safe in any future general election. _ be safe in any future general election, but the other side of this is because — election, but the other side of this is because we have been talking about— is because we have been talking about the — is because we have been talking about the possibility of these by—elections for so long, there has been _ by—elections for so long, there has been a _ by—elections for so long, there has been a pretty good piece of expectation management done by boris johnson _ expectation management done by boris johnson and his allies to almost halve _ johnson and his allies to almost halve the — johnson

boris johnson together.— boris johnson together. lizzie, clearly you _ boris johnson together. ld _ boris johnson together. lizzie, clearly you would assume - boris johnson together. lizzie, clearly you would assume that | clearly you would assume that ukraine would be pleased by this country is coming together in support of ukraine. can you see any other benefits to this packed? i think improvement in relations between — think improvement in relations between france and the uk is obviously a positive on a number of levels _ obviously a positive on a number of levels it_ obviously a positive on a number of levels it is— obviously a positive on a number of levels. it is useful for ukraine because — levels. it is useful for ukraine because obviously france is a big player— because obviously france is a big player in— because obviously france is a big player in the european union. it's quite _ player in the european union. it's quite interesting that the times picks— quite interesting that the times picks out— quite interesting that the times picks out the fact that boris johnson _

t boris johnson -- who were getting rid of boris johnson added.- rid of boris johnson added. on't think you can _ rid of boris johnson added. i don't think you can be _ rid of boris johnson added. i don't think you can be in _ rid of boris johnson added. i don't think you can be in charge - rid of boris johnson added. i don't think you can be in charge of - think you can be in charge of setting rules during lockdown then blatantly allowing people under your direct leadership to break those rules. ., , ., ., rules. enter next a potential successor- _ rules. enter next a potential successor. boris _ rules. enter next a potential successor. boris johnson - rules. enter next a potential. successor. boris johnson beat rules. enter next a potential - successor. boris johnson beat jeremy successor. borisjohnson beatjeremy hunt successor. boris johnson beatjeremy hunt to the successor. borisjohnson beatjeremy hunt to thejob successor. borisjohnson beatjeremy hunt to the job last time. mr hunt did not want to talk on camera today but his view is clear, tweeting... and the response from

brill, we remind you that we were contacted by boris boris, an israeli doctor, the aromatal medical center are going to a short break, after that the marathon, the only news continues, stay with us we will bind up, we will bind up, we will defeat the stubble news together we are strong unconquered cities of ukraine zaporizhzhia , the city of harsh metallurgists, glorious engine builders and a powerful hydroelectric power plant on the dnieper. and this is also the cradle of the cossack race of ukraine, which never knelt before anyone. zaporizhia cossacks for centuries protected ukrainian lands from invaders during during the liberation war, the zaporizhia army fought for independence for the whole country in the second world war, the city withstood the soviet bombing of the dnieper river and the german occupation, and now zaporizhzhia is full of cossacks spirit, as always, stands indomitably in defense of ukraine. zaporizhzhia is unconquered for the fourth month. ukraine is in conflict with a horde of non-humans who destroy everything in their path. the youth of the red viburnum has bent do

boris johnson around. i've always thought boris johnson was _ around. i've always thought boristing, — johnson was extremely fortunate in his timing, as much as anything. he was the _ his timing, as much as anything. he was the mayor of london before the olympics. _ was the mayor of london before the olympics, we saw him as the queens prime _ olympics, we saw him as the queens prime minister for her platinum jubilee. — prime minister for her platinum jubilee, these great occasions of state _ jubilee, these great occasions of state and — jubilee, these great occasions of state and pump to remind us of britain— state and pump to remind us of britain on— state and pump to remind us of britain on his best, he rides in on those _ britain on his best, he rides in on those coat— britain on his best, he rides in on those coat every time. however it's not looking — those coat every time. however it's not looking so cosy, and those boots will he _ not looking so cosy, and those boots will be ringing in his ears from when — will be ringing in his ears from when he — will be ringing in his

boris johnson is a great campaigner. _ played? boris johnson is a great campaigner. but _ played? boriser, but with it - played? boris johnson is a great campaigner, but with it comes l played? boris johnson is a great campaigner, but with it comes a certain— campaigner, but with it comes a certain amount of baggage, and it is ”p certain amount of baggage, and it is up to— certain amount of baggage, and it is up to the _ certain amount of baggage, and it is up to the parliamentary party to see whether— up to the parliamentary party to see whether the pros and cons balance each other— whether the pros and cons balance each other out, and we will see the vote tonight. each other out, and we will see the vote tonight-— vote tonight. what is it that has led ou vote tonight. what is it that has led you to _ vote tonight. what is it that has led you to get _ vote tonight. what is it that has led you to get to _ vote tonight. what is it that has led you to get to this _ vote tonight. what is it that has led you to get to this point? - vote tonight. what is it that has| led you to get to this p

boris johnson.— boris johnson. after the votes counted in _ boris johnson. erdict here? it always comes up smellin: verdict here? it always comes up smelling of— verdict here? it always comes up smelling of roses. _ verdict here? it always comes up smelling of roses. like _ verdict here? it always comes up smelling of roses. like my i verdict here? it always comes up smelling of roses. like my are i verdict here? it always comes up i smelling of roses. like my are you pleased? — smelling of roses. like my are you pleased? no, _ smelling of roses. like my are you pleased? no, definitely— smelling of roses. like my are you pleased? no, definitely not. i smelling of roses. like my are you pleased? no, definitely not. why. pleased? no, definitely not. why not? -- are _ pleased? no, definitely not. why not? -- are you _ pleased? no, definitely not. not? —— are you pleased? pleased? no, definitely not. why not? -- are you pleased? i- not? -- are you pleased? i have voted conservative _ not? -- are you pleased? i have voted conservative all _ not? -- are you pleased

we are going to hear from boris johnson sto— boris johnson stop were in the uk became in 2018 _ borisernment put together the partnership between oxford university and astrazeneca that produced the world's most popular vaccine and, during our time as chair in office, the uk supported the delivery of more than 1.4 billion doses of covid vaccines to commonwealth countries. applause thank you. the pandemic posed a common threat to all humanity. the same is true of catastrophic climate change. no one understands this better than are common friends in the caribbean, the pacific and the indian ocean, who can see the incoming tide surging ever higher up their beaches, threatening to inundate their villages and towns and in time the entire landmass of some island states. for them, the baleful effects of climate change are not vagal theoretical, but already happening before their eyes —— are not vague, or theoretical. when we hosted cop26 in glasgow last november it was these fellow commonwealth leaders who spoke with the greatest urgency and authority about the perils of coating the earth wit

boris johnson was _ thatcher style alternative. boris johnson was a — thatcher style alternative. boris? he is a politician who can be many things to many l who can be many things to many people _ who can be many things to many people and that's part of his success— people and that's part of his success and part of the reason why his electorally very successful as a politician, — his electorally very successful as a politician, so he can be all things to all— politician, so he can be all things to all people. he is not necessarily one nation, — to all people. he is not necessarily one nation, he moved to the right after— one nation, he moved to the right after the — one nation, he moved to the right after the brexit vote. he one nation, he moved to the right after the brexit vote.— one nation, he moved to the right after the brexit vote. he was always after the brexit vote. he was always a liberal, after the brexit vote. he was always a liberal. in — after the brexit vote. he was always a liberal, in favour— after the brexit vote. he was always a liberal, in favour of— after the brexit

boris maksudov. boris again. greetings how is the situation at this moment? yes colleagues greetings from the last live broadcast. we were in the basement. now, with dashes, we have reached such a strategic height. from here we can say with confidence that donetsk has finally turned into such a front zone. uh, fighting. that's for my back is directly smoking, just the same kievsky district, which today most of all got that same uh, football arena. here, next to him here is known to everyone. e. well, well, we can say that over the past three days, practically, without embarrassment and without stopping. uh, even at night, ukrainian artillery continues to iron the city , everything that is possible in donetsk is stopped, and in some parts of it there is a bus service, because it’s just not safe to appear now, and there are people on the roads. at these moments, according to our observations, there is practically no they go out into the streets and hide wherever possible, and of course, uh, the situation is especially difficult right now. for three days now, the city has practically all its microdistricts, not only the northern part, which is adjacent to the military line. contact, but uh, there's no safe place. let's see how the residents of the city themselves saw the next shelling. impressive footage, of course, it's pointless to talk about it. from what types of weapons ukrainian artillery. now it works around the city, everything that is possible is flying in any part of the city. here today noted that even the character in the center has changed a little. donetsk almost every every 5 minutes is heard at first, like a projectile. uh flies out of the howitzer, then after a few seconds, such an unpleasant characteristic whistle, and two or three kilometers away, the projectile is already lying down. strictly speaking, here is the result of this result. this shelling behind me, but over the past three days it has been blazing, perhaps there was no such area that did not become a victim of this shelling, most often the shells fly along civilian objects the day before, the fire department was especially badly hit, firefighters here generally do all such titanic work, which they barely have time to go out to all the fires, which are five to six times a day, and fire brigades. it is known that one of the rescuers during the uh this mission. unfortunately, so many people have died in the last 24 hours, we know about three dead, uh, 15, and wounded count for the last 3 months. it has already gone to hundreds of 200 almost a man of civilians died 4.000 the building was destroyed and uh, how are the residents themselves, how are they themselves not just let's see. and in our yard there , too, cars flew past the elevator. i was hiding with a small child. well, okay, sitting the door kept slamming the door so impossible. i've already taken all those pills. ouch. so live on. here's to a few as now, not embarrassed by the ukrainian artillery, continues almost without interruption a little bit, the city is monitoring the situation. thank you for new attacks. borysd donetsk the district turned out to be in need of medical assistance to the refugees of the zaporizhzhya village. october people told how they were forced to hide in the basements from shelling. ukraine scatters did not know that there was a house? almost 700 agreements worth more than five trillion six hundred billion rubles in st. petersburg today summed up the preliminary results of this year's international economic forum, which took place on the jubilee 25th time. the theme of the event is new world new opportunities, as stated by the organizing committee, 14,000 people from 130 countries of 79 states took part in uniform sent official representatives. we're approaching six trillion. uh, rubles of signed agreements on this forum. at the moment, 691 agreements worth five trillion 639 billion have been signed. in fact, today we are summing up only preliminary and statistical results, because there will be further. governments, relevant analytical services will carry out powerful sy

boris johnson wakes u . to do. but has boris johnson wakes u- in to do. but has boris johnson wakes up in there — to do. hnson wakes up in there this _ to do. but has boris johnson wakes up in there this morning, _ to do. but has boris johnson wakes up in there this morning, looks - to do. but has boris johnson wakes up in there this morning, looks at i up in there this morning, looks at those front pages, read those articles, watches the telly, everybody who knows him says the last thing he is going to do is walk away, he is going to leave here kicking and screaming, isn't he? absolutely, and the first thing he will do is to say, i am seizing back the agenda. they will have a cabinet meeting here today, i'm sure the cabinet will rally round him. he's going to come out and say he told his mps last night before they voted, i have lots of things i want to do, and some of those things we will see very quickly. northern ireland, he will try to press ahead with legislation in northern ireland. he has been talking about housing, he says he has got a big thing coming with michael gove to free up housing. he has

boris johnson, thins unpopularity. under boris johnson, things keep — unpopularity. under boriss keep getting worse. - unpopularity. under boris johnson, things keep getting worse. so - unpopularity. under boris johnson, things keep getting worse. so let l unpopularity. under boris johnson, l things keep getting worse. so let me tell the _ things keep getting worse. so let me tell the prime — things keep getting worse. so let me tell the prime minister— things keep getting worse. so let me tell the prime minister what- things keep getting worse. so let me tell the prime minister what the - tell the prime minister what the british— tell the prime minister what the british peorrie _ tell the prime minister what the british people expect. - tell the prime minister what the british people expect. they- tell the prime minister what the i british people expect. they expect to be _ british people expect. they expect to be led _ british people expect. they expect to be led and — british people expect. they expect to be led and to _ british people expect. they expect to be led and to be

boris is _ preserve his own dignity? i don't think boris is a _ preserve his own dignity? i don't think boriswho worries | think boris is a man who worries about his own dignity and i don't think he is a man who can actually change, but on the other hand if he is threatened with a change of rules and there will be another vote he willjust and there will be another vote he will just say, and there will be another vote he willjust say, bring it on. the question is whether another 30 mps after the by—election defeats later this month switch over and say enough is enough, that is the only way in my view they will get rid of him. the cabinet is all made up of people who were particularly chosen because they are loyal, so similar situations with margaret thatcher will not happen. theresa may try to fight on but it was very different, she was repeatedly defeated in parliament. the opposition to boris could perhaps undermine him by not supporting him in votes in the house of commons. if the government is defeated he will then find it very difficult to carry on. i think the battle is on but be under n

boris johnson wants? yes, it could. than boris johnson wants? yes, it could- the — than boris johnson wants? oris johnson wants? yes, it could. the formal rules _ than boris johnson wants? yes, it could. the formal rules of- than boris johnson wants? yes, it could. the formal rules of the - than boris johnson wants? yes, it| could. the formal rules of the 1922 committee is that after you have won a no—confidence ballot, you are safe for another year but the 1922 committee sets its own rules. you just needs to change its mind. this is what famously happened to theresa may, she did win a no—confidence ballot but things got worse so people from the 1922 committee said if you don't resign, we will change the rules and reopen the contest. actually, there is a vote coming up, elections are coming up for the leadership of the 1922. backbench conservative mps get to vote and it looks very likely that pro boris johnson mps will be routed in that contest and opponents will win. it makes it more likely that if things don't improve, whether sir graham brady is chairman of the 1922 will perhaps pull that

boris johnson's allies were really riled _ over. boris johnson's allies were really riled yesterday _ over. boris yesterday by - over. boris johnson's allies were really riled yesterday by what. over. boris johnson's allies were i really riled yesterday by what they saw as in manoeuvring towards a leadership bid with his criticism of the prime minister. and those who have long criticised mrjohnson say they are down but not out. i have long criticised mrjohnson say they are down but not out. i accept they are down but not out. i accept the democratic _ they are down but not out. i accept the democratic outcome _ they are down but not out. i accept the democratic outcome and - they are down but not out. i accept - the democratic outcome and encourage all colleagues to do the same, but two in five of us did not express support for the prime minister. we now need to feel included in shaping the party's future. find now need to feel included in shaping the party's future-— the party's future. and those in government — the party's future. and those in government who _ the party's future. and those in go

boris johnson. ., . . . johnson. right on cue. that also hels johnson. right on cue. that also helps boris _ johnson. right on cue. that also helps boriso. helps boris johnson because he is helps borisjohnson because he is able to— helps borisjohnson because he is able to say— helps borisjohnson because he is able to say in the midst of this, we are dealing — able to say in the midst of this, we are dealing with the european crisis — are dealing with the european crisis~ we _ are dealing with the european crisis. we have been diverted by a westminster bubble crisis, as he would _ westminster bubble crisis, as he would see — westminster bubble crisis, as he would see it, going into potentially messy— would see it, going into potentially messy leadership contest. there is not one _ messy leadership contest. there is not one possible successor. rishi sunak. _ not one possible successor. rishi sunak. li2— not one possible successor. rishi sunak, liz truss... she has expressed_ sunak, liz truss... she has expressed her loyalty to boris johnson _ expressed her loyalty to boris johnson. tom tugendhat also potentially a candidate. a former cab

boris _ a long war, pm warns west. this is an article that boris johnson - a long war, pm warns west. this is an article that boris article that borisjohnson has written for the sunday times. of course _ written for the sunday times. of course he — written for the sunday times. of course he was in ukraine this weekend, _ course he was in ukraine this weekend, met president zelensky. the article _ weekend, met president zelensky. the article is _ weekend, met president zelensky. the article is really interesting, it's -ot article is really interesting, it's got a _ article is really interesting, it's got a hit — article is really interesting, it's got a bit of death but it's not polemic— got a bit of death but it's not polemic that you'd expect from boris johnson _ polemic that you'd expect from boris johnson when he was a columnist previously — johnson when he was a columnist previously. at the heart of it is a four— previously. at the heart of it is a four point plant that he says will meet _ four point plant that he says will meet the — four point plant that he says will meet the ways they met was to stand unite

boris!" tennis than me." i said, "perish the thought. boris!"— thought, boris!" obviously politics is not a thought, boris!" e have died who perhaps didn't need to because of misjudgments on his watch. his dishonesty, claimed by his critics, is why partly he is in this very perilous moment. having got thejob that he perhaps always wanted, are you surprised to see him making so many mistakes and potentially risk holding onto it? it is many mistakes and potentially risk holding onto it?— holding onto it? it is interesting because he _ holding onto it? it is interesting because he got _ holding onto it? it is interesting because he got the _ holding onto it? it is interesting because he got the job, - holding onto it? it is interesting because he got the job, no - holding onto it? it is interesting | because he got the job, no way, holding onto it? it is interesting i because he got the job, no way, as because he got thejob, no way, as you say, with extraordinary charisma, and filming with boris johnson has been, until recently, he would never get booed, people of all classes would come up and say, good on you,

johnson about party gate _ of the damage to boris johnson about party gate is — of the damage to boris johnson about party gate is locked _ of the damage to borisis locked in. _ of the damage to boris johnson about party gate is locked in. if— of the damage to boris johnson about party gate is locked in. if you - party gate is locked in. if you think— party gate is locked in. if you think you _ party gate is locked in. if you think you should _ party gate is locked in. if you think you should quit, - party gate is locked in. if you think you should quit, you i party gate is locked in. if youl think you should quit, you will party gate is locked in. if you - think you should quit, you will not change _ think you should quit, you will not change your— think you should quit, you will not change your view— think you should quit, you will not change your view regardless - think you should quit, you will not change your view regardless of. think you should quit, you will not. change your view regardless of lord geidt's _ change your view regardless of lord geidt's decision. _ change your view regardless of lord geidt's decision. i'm _ change your vie

boris johnson? to some i this is for boris johnson? to some extent, it depends _ this is for boris johnson? johnson? to some extent, it depends on the - this is for boris johnson? to some | extent, it depends on the contents of that letter because it is quite an enigmatic resignation. lord geidt hasn't actually said what he's resigned, hejust said hasn't actually said what he's resigned, he just said with regret, he's leaving — it's obvious to anyone else standing outside looking in why that might be. butjohnson right now is ok, he's safe from that vote of no confidence, though 41% of tories voted against him. by the rules, they can't challenge them for another year. so it lord geidt hasn't left a smoking gun, he hasn't pulled the trigger on a challenge to the prime minister because he hasn't detailed it yet, anyway, his reasons for going. he's a servant, you'd think he did give his lease ends to reasons for leaving that she's a public servant.— reasons for leaving that she's a public servant. bringing partygate back into the _ public servant. bringing partygate back into the headlines, - pu

boris johnson must go. you say the message is boris _ boris johnson must go. many tory mps. i think there is a positive vote. i campaigned in a lot of elections and here in east devon and i will be frank, a lot of people want to see the back of boris johnson. ~ ., , want to see the back of boris johnson. ~ . , ., .,' . ., johnson. was there an unofficial act with johnson. was there an unofficial pact with the — johnson. was there an unofficial pact with the labour _ johnson. was there an unofficial pact with the labour party - johnson. was there an unofficial pact with the labour party when | johnson. was there an unofficial i pact with the labour party when it came to tiverton & honiton? ho. came to tiverton & honiton? no. there has — came to tiverton & honiton? no. there has not _ came to tiverton & honiton? no. there has not been _ came to tiverton & honiton? firm there has not been and there came to tiverton & honiton? fin. there has not been and there will not be. myjob as liberal democrat leader is to win as many seats. the seats we can win, it means def

boris ivanin, he is direct contact with the studio boris welcome, how did the negotiations and flights from turkey go yes, alexander greetings. we are now near the ministry of foreign affairs of armenia, where we ended about half an hour ago. uh, the negotiations between the two, uh, delegations of russia and uh, armenia lasted for about 2 hours, but i will note right away that before this meeting, which was also discussed in a narrow way. in the format of two foreign ministers and in the expanded one, when now the delegations are in full force, and before these meetings, sergey lavrov went visit the memorial. uh, to the victims of the genocide, the armenians, on the tsitser na hobert hill, this is a sign in yerevan a place dedicated to the tragic events of 1915, and when on the territory of the ottoman empire the mass exterminated the armenian population sergey lavrov in memory of the dead passengers, the saints, and the monument were communions, and wine to the eternal flame and uh hmm already after that came here to the ministry of foreign affairs, and to talk about the differences and turkey and and, which does not recognize, uh, the genocide of the army of the population with yerevan and the other, but very sensitive to problems of yerevan it's nagorno-karabakh that's what sergey lavrov said. we reaffirmed our readiness to help conclude a peace treaty between yerevan and baku and, in general, to solve the humanitarian problems that persist in this region. we also welcome the process of normalization of armen turkish and armenian armenian-turkish relations. this should also contribute to the general improvement of the situation in the region. there is still no peace agreement, since there are unresolved territorial claims and now we are talking about limiting state border. however, in yerevan, as well as throughout the republic. far from everyone agrees with this, even here in the armenian capital on france square for more than a month, but the opposition tent camp has been set up. very numerous, but, and people perform there , including. the current head of the armenian government nikol pashinyan, and here is the minister of foreign languages ​​today at a press conference i had to reassure everyone to talk about the real situation in the armenian capital. there is no political crisis. i can give you two proofs. last summer, early parliamentary elections were held, in which the citizens of armenia clearly answered a number of questions and resolved the political crisis that existed at that time. these elections were recognized as democratic and transparent by all observation missions. citizens unambiguously expressed their opinion. secondly, we monitor the rallies, their large number or small number does not mean that the rallies enjoy the support of the population, armenia is a democratic country, everyone has the right to peaceful rallies. questions were also raised at the press conference for sergey lavrov following his visit to ankara yesterday, where the russian foreign minister is with his turkish counterpart. in a fierce step, a lot of different issues were discussed, but one of the key issues was the issue of exports. uh, grains from ukraine, so, yesterday, kiev welcomed, it should be noted, uh, the results of the meeting in ankara . however, it still continues to insist that to express wheat, and in the black sea under the auspices of him, and not only through the mediation of istanbul well, again, as stated. uh, ukrainian minister of foreign affairs dmitry kuleba kiev continues to demand that the west put naval weapons against it. the military has been announcing corridors every day for more than a month security, which can be used without hindrance without any threat to themselves by any uh ships with cargoes that are waiting for shipment from the black sea ports, provided, of course, that the ukrainians clear mines, and the strip, and the coastal uh, which in general is under their control and the fact that our turkish colleagues are trying to convince kiev a of the need to stop dragging out this process. i think it's very, very positive. well, back to visiting. sergei lavrov here. in armenia, it should also be noted that the trip program is not over yet, ahead of the meeting with the prime minister of the republic and the president, it must also be said that this year moscow and yerevan are celebrating 30 years since diplomatic contacts were established. sergey lavrov invited the armenian foreign ministers to moscow and they met over the past year already five times, but soon there will be a sixth. here in yerevan they promise to erect a monument soon. uh, russian armenian friendship. well, tomorrow in yerevan there will be a meeting of the council of ministers of foreign affairs of all states that are members of the collective security treaty organization, where all these security issues will be discussed already within the framework of the entire post-soviet space. alexander yes borisnk you boris ivanovna spoke about how the negotiations between the foreign ministers of russia and armenia were held. russian aviation destroyed a training center in the zhytomyr region, where foreign mercenaries were trained. uh, our air defense forces shot down another ukrainian su-25, new data on the special operation was announced at a briefing in the ministry of defense units of the armed forces of the russian federation have begun clearing roads or again of the massif of the svyato gory national park in the areas of settlements, svetogorsk yarovaya studenog and sosnovaya donetsk people's republic over the past day, 126 explosive devices of various types installed by ukrainian nationalists have been destroyed, including 54 anti-tank mines , the armed forces of the russian federation continue a special operation in ukraine as a result of an air strike by high-precision missiles based in the area of ​​​​the settlement, novograd-volynsky region. the training center of the armed force

boris johnson and his _ should be. the mirror with boris johnson and his wife _ should be. the mirror with borise in rwanda, very much not in the uk, and he's got a few trips coming up as well. the times also focuses on this, describing it as the prime minister facing a new tory threat, again focusing on these two elections. now two in one go. in your thoughts, susie, in terms of what happens next for the prime minister, bearing in mind that his cabinet minister was claiming as the paper was describing that oliver dowden was putting to run rishi because 's campaign. i run rishi because 's campaign. i don't think it's going to matter to borisjohnson that he's lost these by—elections. i don't think it will matter if every single cabinet minister resigned tomorrow if every single member of his party said, "please, you have to resign." i think he would carry on. i think he has that self belief. also, a real need to not leave as a failure. despite the fact that every career does end that way. there isn't enough wd—40 in the world to get him back out of downing street. i agree with ali, i don't think

boris johnson and the russian the president or the russian president sends boris johnson to communicate with the head of the dpr, of course, the dpr court and in this way, if mr. johnson wants to try to get his citizens out. let him call the thesis to the head of the donetsk people's republic. if the lives of these and these people are able to pull out a certain number of our guys from captivity. i'm all for getting the guys out. alexander yurievich , first i must agree with bogdan regarding my personal opinion. i understand that few people are interested in it. i am not a judge investigator. well, i think that of course they should be shot and it’s an honorable death not to be hanged to be shot now how will this be my personal opinion , now it will actually it's not just the pants that's under the pants that's torn, because, well, they're in a situation that's not even a fact, i don't know, they can't do anything now, thanks, uh, the british tabloids need them to do it every day morning and evening, because it is written silent. yes, i after that, the pumping of public opinion will force them to somehow crawl out of this twine and do something that they can do. first, they eh? appealing to the minsk process , which we have not forgotten for a long time. they will try to act according to the same scheme as the western ones. uh, the leaders turned to donetsk lugansk through putin, who, as it were, represented them. it was normal communication, even in public space. well, i will convey, that is, the decision, as if for donetsk and luhansk, but putin acted as a communicator, because that he acted as a guarantor when they were not sovereign, they were not recognized by donetsk, they do not recognize now. let's not refer me to the international law of it. no, and so it was not on the 24th of february ended completely, which means that this is an old scheme that they will not try to use. for some reason, i am 99% sure that putin will do it, just like ivan says. he will send them. call donetsk, this means the end of communication, because they cannot be called. next move. that is, it's like the top next today would already have been lavrov's commentary. by the way, on this topic, it really looks like what you are saying, well. in addition, one more proposal now increases the second also did not agree. lavrov said that how would this judicial system of the donetsk people's republic to her. she must be treated with respect. by the way, if uh hmm johnson stays in this split on the verge of tearing his pants, then this is his resignation, he will be forced, because these are british citizens, for whom he did nothing scandal with parties compared the death of the british earl given away and the party are two different things. thank you. there , download further, and the second option, as it were, lower communications, and with an exchange initiative in the form of zelensky uh-huh, he will act as the president of ukraine, because formally ukraine hired these mercenaries. we live for announcements in embassies and others, that is, ukraine paid them money, that is, a soldier in this way, for example, they sentenced one of our boys to death. i will tell you. here we have one sentenced to life, the second we will sentence life sentence for these two, we change these two or three. i think the exchange should be a little different. and i now well, i understand that now i am a channel, when it doesn’t work, it’s british russian, otherwise the channel will work. uh, ukraine is also russian to donetsk directly. here, how will they do it here? uh, i don't know, i think it will reach and the last look. these kinds of stories are actually stories about the war, not about humanitarian missions. this is, uh, our strategies evaluate this sentence in terms of war success, not war success, but not good evil and other garbage, but olya is hercules and therefore it is necessary to give the enemy certain signals, as it was called, first faps got up, then negotiations, then faps, then negotiations, then childhood without belts. went to surrender. here everything is contained in absolutely normal human relationships. yes. this is him, so here i don’t exclude the opinion of the military to shoot them. as for the next five, you’ll think of another version of humanism, you need to understand that first of all you need to be humane, these people arrived, and not to your war. they came. it is a foreign state to fight and kill russian soldiers and officers and russian residents of ukraine. it is not these british, moroccan and many other foreigners who are now on the territory of ukraine. they came to kill ours. this must be understood, therefore humanism, the more of them there are, the more our soldiers and officers will die. first of all, you need to think about humanism in relation to ours, what is for this, therefore, here is the story of the exchange. i don't like her very much. to me another option is interesting, which, of course, most likely, london will not accept, but nevertheless, it would be worthwhile for them to make such an offer well, and for this, something can be done with this verdict if he promises to officially openly, so that more no pmcs on the territory of england will send a single more than a single battle to the territory of a ukrainian citizen on the territory of ukraine there will be no more and in the event. this will happen will be captured by someone else there from germany from holland from italy everything that you pain that exists it means that if written legal statements are given guarantees that western pmcs will no longer work on ukrainian territory with a green light. why only dude? what a half yes yes, then let them sign a paper that they never, not under any conditions no, this will never go. you just hear it, and in humanism, these people came to kill our officer soldiers, and will continue to do so. if they think that they will be exchanged so easily, they came and captured, unlike the azov people. someone else they will count. they will see this story. these are the newspapers that the british tabloids are now writing about them. they will also come out after a while and will write them cancelled. this is what the new americans need to say, they won’t think, well, even if we get into the flin, we were exchanged by viktorovich, which even if we imagine for a second that boris to sign some documents that we don’t even send british weapons. i don’t believe it, but for a second the fire closed my eyes, i can is to submit a document. all the same will go through australia, new zealand, some british patronage territories. and we are british . we do not need to sign a piece of paper, he will not sign this piece of paper, because he will not be able to do this, even if russia's conditions are the same from the point of view. pr showed that these citizens are important to you. so do not send new ones for slaughter and i send you to once again draw your attention to the fact that in april they actually addressed johnson directly and there was no reaction from the british prime minister andrey nikolaevich was, you know, about the humanism of inhumanism. pr understand here the problem is that the uk in any case, for example, negotiations regarding these two of its citizens, and i'm bloated, they will not go. for what reason, for the first, firstly, this is a defeat b

boris johnson's distrust of boris johnson as a result, he remains in his post. the prime minister was defeated by 2011 party members opposed by 148, the head of the british cabinet was at the center of a scandal over parties on downing street during a nationwide lockdown. at first , johnson denied attending the events. then, nevertheless, he admitted that he had violated the instructions, apologized and paid a fine, but against the background of this news, the prime minister's rating fell to the lowest values ​​​​at the beginning of his career, and even now , after the majority of conservatives supported johnson, political scientists predict that he will not stay in his post for a long time. hold out, and lisa herzen is transferred from london with such a victory and defeat is not needed. here is how the results are generally commented in britain today. here we are of distrust to borisy members ballots against him. though not corrupted, johnson's future as premier is now and forever ruined. almost all political scientists say so. boris johnson was supported by 211 and opposed by 148, so i can announce that parliament expresses its confidence. here is the reaction of the press newspaper mirror and metro end of the party or end of the party in english - this is the same word guardian prime minister clung to power, despite the humiliation of the vote, yes or star without respect. come on, pinocchio, please. those who lies, the nose grows ndpendent restrained wounded boris in danger boris johnson at the same time behaves as always, and as he certainly does. i would teach students to behave. if he had to resign today and open a school for future prime ministers of his own name, 40% of your fellow party members. against you. how can you continue to work? oh, this is a wonderful result for me and for our country. the convincing result means that you can leave everything in

face a leadership vote with boris _ could face a leadership vote with borisjohnson today, and could face a leadership vote with boris johnson today, and about an hour or— borisur or so — boris johnson today, and about an hour or so later, that was confirmed, and, yes, iwas in hour or so later, that was confirmed, and, yes, i was in the room _ confirmed, and, yes, i was in the room to— confirmed, and, yes, i was in the room to hear— confirmed, and, yes, i was in the room to hear the results. it was very— room to hear the results. it was very tense, _ room to hear the results. it was very tense, lots of mps with really glynn faces to see that one “ one —— one 48... i think it is below my personal— —— one 48... i think it is below my personal projection, the line below of 150, _ personal projection, the line below of 150, and — personal projection, the line below of 150, and i was like, can even of150, and i was like, can even stay— of 150, and i was like, can even stayon— of 150, and i was like, can even stay on vegas more than 150? you've seen the — stay on vegas more than 150? you've seen the clip _ stay on vegas more than 150? you've seen the clip from the

boris. but the issue is, he's obviously made _ boris. but the issue is, he's obviously made a _ boris. t sound like the eminent cut that sajid javid is talking about. cut that said javid is talking about. ., ., , ., , , about. no, of course, and this is what always— about. no, of course, and this is what always happens _ about. no, of course, and this is what always happens with i about. no, of course, and this is- what always happens with government. the chancellor ends up arguing with the prime _ the chancellor ends up arguing with the prime minister because the chancellor is the person who holds the strings. the main problem with tories _ the strings. the main problem with tories is _ the strings. the main problem with tories is the — the strings. the main problem with tories is the cost of living crisis. as you _ tories is the cost of living crisis. as you say, _ tories is the cost of living crisis. as you say, taxes have gone up, but also, _ as you say, taxes have gone up, but also, cuts _ as you say, taxes have gone up, but also, cuts have gone up. people's supermarket bills have

boris _ my seat would be lost. i don't think borisjohnson is likely my seat would be lost. i don't think boris johnson is likely to come and -- succumb — borise he has shown time and again that he doesn't _ has shown time and again that he doesn't follow the usual rules of politics — doesn't follow the usual rules of politics for better or worse. sunday telea-rah, politics for better or worse. sunday telegraph. not _ politics for better or worse. sunday telegraph, not sure _ politics for better or worse. sunday telegraph, not sure who _ politics for better or worse. sunday telegraph, not sure who was - politics for better or worse. sunday telegraph, not sure who was told l politics for better or worse. sunday| telegraph, not sure who was told to lead off on this, but who want to talk about the steel tariffs? that was me. talk about the steel tariffs? that was me- the _ talk about the steel tariffs? that was me. the prime _ talk about the steel tariffs? that was me. the prime minister wants to introduce _ was me. the prime minister wants to introduce new tariffs on steel which ithink— introduce new tariffs on steel which i think will— introdu

after months of awkward question for boris johnson, weeks _ question for boris johnson, weeks of question for borison, weeks of mountin- question for boris johnson, weeks of mountin- speculation weeks of mounting speculation and a _ weeks of mounting speculation and a day— weeks of mounting speculation and a day of intense public, sometimes angry arguments, the moment — sometimes angry arguments, the moment. 35s sometimes angry arguments, the moment. �* . , moment. a verdict, the result with yes. _ moment. a verdict, the result with yes. the _ moment. a verdict, the result with yes, the potential- moment. a verdict, the result with yes, the potential to - with yes, the potential to remove mrjohnson as prime minister but also shape his future in thejob. the minister but also shape his future in the job.— minister but also shape his future in the job. future in the “ob. the vote in favour future in the “ob. the vote in f of— future in the job. the vote in favour of having _ future in the job. the vote in favour of having confidence i future in the job. the vote in | favour of having confidence in bor

potentially really explosive bullet points or boris johnson.— potentially really explosive bullet points or boris johnson. some really interestin: points or borisexpected to, they got many more than expected to, they got 148, two voting is boris johnson in that confidence vote, the anticipation was it was going to be around 120, they did not dislodge him, and there is no mechanism at the moment people in westminster parent for to lead another vote. there's been talk of changing the rules so that may be borisjohnson would face another confidence vote within a year, because at the moment it has to be immunity from a challenge for 12 months, but what the reporting is that there might be a bit of a loophole where you could get local conservative party chairs to actually express concern, they can hold a general meeting, and vote against the prime minister —— what the i is reporting. that is a bit of a loophole. he was threatened against theresa may by, of all people, jacob rees—mogg. it would be really interesting if that goes anywhere. the other is using detail in the story is talking of education secretary nadhim zahawi emerging as a unity candida

, they tell me, "he is. about boris, they tell me, "he is dead, _ about boris, they tell me, "he is dead. isn't— about borisout boris, they tell me, "he is dead, isn't he? he cannot- about boris, they tell me, "he isi dead, isn't he? he cannot survive being _ dead, isn't he? he cannot survive being a _ dead, isn't he? he cannot survive being a serial— dead, isn't he? he cannot survive being a serial liar." _ dead, isn't he? he cannot survive being a serial liar." in— dead, isn't he? he cannot survive being a serial liar." in french - being a serial liar." in french politics. _ being a serial liar." in french politics. one _ being a serial liar." in french politics, one never— being a serial liar." in french politics, one never lies! - politics, one never lies! laughtfr— laughter adam, there is a line isn't there, precisely because this rebellion was so broad, that it lacked the depth and the focus. in a sense, the rebels have now played their hand. any other mp who might oppose him may think, "what is the point of declaring it? just to be frozen out by number 10 declaring it? just to be frozen out by number

appears on the internet. cambri even about the very first trip of boris johnson to ukraine people. in the background shouting boris boris says to the prime minister sir - it's the russians in the middle east that look at what is happening in a completely different way than in europe this picture jordanian cartoonist, and hoxha himself is obviously talking about refugees to the european union, but by the fact that they are spreading a rug on the left welcome dmitry polyansky said, how did the united europe change in the xii century metamorphosis, a really interesting european integration that began in the middle of the last century was probably , one of the most successful political projects in the history of the old world, and at the same time a pledge of peace between sworn enemies and a guarantee of the economic prosperity of all involved, but the composition of the participants was another homogeneous in cultural historical terms. there was also a common and undeniable external threat. soviet communism was greatly stimulated by unity. and in the old days, we will talk with the welcome guest mikhail lipkin, director o

boris _ through. what led voters here to move away from boris johnson? | through. what led voters here to - move away from borisnson? listen to the peeple- i _ move away from boris johnson? listen to the people. i think _ move away from boris johnson? listen to the people. i think partygate - to the people. i think partygate didn't help. _ to the people. i think partygate didn't help, and _ to the people. i think partygate didn't help, and i _ to the people. i think partygate didn't help, and i think- to the people. i think partygate didn't help, and i think there i to the people. i think partygate didn't help, and i think there is| to the people. i think partygate. didn't help, and i think there is a loss of— didn't help, and i think there is a loss of trust _ didn't help, and i think there is a loss of trust. the _ didn't help, and i think there is a loss of trust. the element - didn't help, and i think there is a loss of trust. the element over. didn't help, and i think there is a . loss of trust. the element over the years— loss of trust. the element over the years i_ loss of trust. the element over the yea

attention, a caricature from the cambrian style is still about boris johnson's very first trip to ukraine, people back. they shout, boris borisays to the prime minister sir - this is russians in the middle east look at what is happening in a completely different way than in europe. , a metamorphosis, a really interesting european integration that began in the middle of the last century was probably one of the most successful political projects in the history of the old world at the same time and a guarantee of peace between sworn adversaries and a guarantee of economic prosperity for all involved, but the composition of the participants was otherwise homogeneous in cultural historical terms. and there was also a common and indisputable external threat. soviet communism greatly stimulated unity. and in the old days, we will talk with the welcome guest mikhail lipkin, director of the institute of world history, a wonderful specialist in europe of the last century. hello mikhailovich. so, when the sixtieth anniversary of european integration was celebrated a couple of years ago, one of the leaders of the european said that one o

attention, there is a caricature from the cambrian style about boris johnson’s very first trip to ukraine, people back. they shouted boris boriser says to the prime minister sir - russians in the middle east look at what is happening in a completely different way than in europe, this is a drawing by a jordanian cartoonist, and hoxha himself is clear that we are talking about refugees to the european union, but by the fact that on the left they spread a rug welcome dmitry polyansky said, how the united europe changed in the 12th century, the metamorphosis is really interesting. european integration, which began in the middle of the last century, was probably one of the most successful political projects in the history of the old world, at the same time a guarantee of peace between sworn enemies and a guarantee of the economic prosperity of all involved, but the composition of participants was otherwise homogeneous in cultural and historical terms. and there was also a common and indisputable external threat. soviet communism greatly stimulated unity. and in the old days, we will talk with the welcome guest mikhail lipkin, direc