so bosca divided their fundings and recommendations into three categories. the first set are based on budget and the second based on schedule and the third set based on scope of the projects. so in their first set of findings related to budget, bosca asked themselves the question, what is the impact for the revisions on the individual budget project. and i'm paraphrasing the direct quote for saving space on the slide. and to answer that question that they ask themselves, they pointed out the sfpuc is deferring projects in the 10-year capital improvement fund program and that's true, it avoids the water rate as you know. they also mentioned and that including risks at the 65% confidence level which is lower than the previous contingent see. they believe the projects that are being laid will be timed appropriate for the goals established. the wsip will address this. regarding the second finding, provided a memo on the risk methodology to the commission. in short, spuc believes it's appropriate given the balance of risk at this point in the program and i'll be