there are still such big disagreements. is consistent with the spirit of reconciliation in bosnia and herzegovinagion, and this is contrary to the need to maintain peace and stability in the balkans and europe as a whole. bosnia and herzegovina became one of the co-authors of the resolution, but not all members of the presidium of this multinational country approved this initiative. thus, the bosnian authorities violated the constitution, the text which is enshrined in the internationally approved dayton agreements on a settlement in the balkans. it turns out that all the blame was placed on the serbs, and... the un resolution called into question the very legitimacy of the existence of bosnia and herzegovina, so they will propose to the croat-muslim part of the country to peacefully disband this federation. republika srpska is one of the signatories of the dayton agreements, all their annexes, including the constitution of bosnia and herzegovina. and we are leaving bosnia and herzegovina. we will do this peacefully, we will not allow a single act of violence. neighboring serbia said the adoption

all annexes to it, including the constitution of bosnia and herzegovina. are leaving bosnia and herzegovina. we will do this peacefully. we will not tolerate any act of violence. neighboring serbia declared acceptance. such a resolution is a violation of international law. centered dozens of cars with national flags drove through belgrade. there are many posters in the city with the inscription: “we are not a genocidal people, we remember.” orthodox churches in serbia rang their bells in protest. anton dadykin, ekaterina radaeva, matvey popov, news. there is too much controversy surrounding the events in srebrrenica due to the credibility of the accusations. attitude towards the serbs raises questions, about this in our information. srebryanitsa, a vast enclave, an area of ​​more than 500 km. in 1992, bosnia and herzegovina announced its secession from yugoslavia. a war began in the republic with with the participation of bosnian muslims, serbs and croats. srebryanica was then under the control of the serbs, but then the bosnians occupied it and organized

and herzegovina so that we can return to the framework of our power, to what we have already brought before in bosniat of republika srpska said that the resolution on genocide in srebrenica would lead to the disintegration of the country. this resolution is bad, it will only complicate relations within bosnia and herzegovina to the point of complete dysfunction. if this happens, and i think it won’t happen, although it could easily happen, i think that bosnia and herzegovina will not survive. the adopted resolution is based on the decision of the international court on the former yugoslavia, according to the version of what happened, promoted by the gaga tribunal, in srebryanica in july 1995, 800 bosnian muslims were allegedly killed. most of whom were said to be civilians. however, some experts consider these data to be overestimated. the serbian side claims that the death toll is lower, most of them were military personnel. at the same time, official belgrade and baneluka recognize fact of executions, but categorically oppose the term genocide. an international commission led by the famous israeli

paul are joining us also from mazda in bosnia herzegovina is dw report that i, that so fits sally. beg of age a welcome. first, let's start with you. eat us in new york, a token. so how today's an vote unfolded? no, the resolution was accepted by only a simple majority. said that means that the next year on the socialist anniversary of the massacre, that will be an international day of comma ration. um, i think it's worth to have a little bit of a closer look to the vote. only 84 countries voted in favor. so that means it's, as i said, just a simple majority under this kind of interesting that the ron, for example, voted in favor and didn't stick with a russia because of the muslim brotherhood. understand english or of course, was one of the 19 countries which opposed devoted to other countries about china hungry and a serbia. of course, what is interesting is how many countries upstate in $68.00 countries didn't vote in favor or oppose the resolution saying as uh, the united arab emirates, for example, saying or arguing that they didn't want to deepen the tension in the region either

so to say, so it was dw to pull it to either sophia, just not a big of which in bosnia herzegovina. and before have you heard from our washington bureau chief in his pole in new york, a french present emanuel macro is a new caledonia. why? he said he would delay a vote and before the plan that is triggered deadly riots. you met with local leaders and said that he still aims to sign the measuring to low, but only with a new political agreement. things people will count and the french will, the pacific cabinetry of funds to give voting rights to the french residents that living there for 10 years. according to paris, almost a quarter of the islands inhabitants identified as your pan leave. as late as a vi indigenous complex state of ultimately folders will die loops the voice and making the honda for any future referendum on independence to pass. well i, let's not to me. um i malkovich as a teaching fellow i asked in university in the okay, she specializes in french politics or french overseas territory. so welcome to the w. and what did you make of the french presence, the announceme

since 1990 , i don't remember what year it is for, this is not mockery of the population of bosnia and herzegovina imagine that you are 25 years old there, it doesn't matter 30 35 you live in bosnia and herzegovina and you understand that nothing serious will ever happen to you in this country , you will. long to live in this country? next to you, everyone speaks the same language that you speak, in croatia, in this same serbia, if you are a serb by origin, but there one country is a member of the european union and nato, the other is a candidate, why will you sit in bosnia? of course, people leave, well, it's logical, it's logical, and we are approaching the fact that we can also have such a situation, if we find ourselves in such a situation, that's why i'm all the time. i will say, we cannot allow russia, using in fact the idea of ​​the inviolability of the borders, which it itself destroyed, to drive us into a tightrope, but we come to the point that the key to this situation is in the hands of the west, that’s all, that is, in our hands, relatively speaking, well not so and many tools in the

this resolution is bad, it will only complicate relations within bosnia and herzegovina to the point and herzegovina will not survive. people took to the streets in protest after the un vote. residents of podgorica, the montenegrin serbs did not approve of the actions of their leadership, which voted for the resolution. the so-called srebrenica massacre is one of hundreds of episodes of the civil war in bosnia and herzegovina. resolution adopted relies on the decision of the international court of justice on the former yugoslavia. according to the version of events promoted by the gaga tribunal in srebrenica in july 1995, 8 thousand bosnian muslims were allegedly killed, most of whom were said to be civilians. they know the fact of the executions, but categorically oppose the term genocide. in addition, it is known that some of the list of silver victims are still living people. milorat dodik showed a list of the ministry of internal affairs, which contains 87 names of living people whose graves are located on the territory of the memorial dedicated to the victims of the genocide. a h

bosnia and herzegovina.dopted resolution is based on the decision of the international court for the former yugoslavia, according to the version of what happened, promoted by the gaga tribunal in srebrjanica in july 1995, 8.0 bosnian muslims were allegedly killed, most of whom were allegedly civilians. however, some experts consider these data to be overestimated. the serbian side claims that the death toll is lower, most of them were military personnel, while official... an international commission led the famous israeli historian gideon greif also came to the conclusion that the events in srebrrenica cannot be called genocide. you can't throw around terms. genocide has rules, which were defined by jewish lawyer raphael lemkin in 1948. sorry, but what happened in srebrenica is not genocide. in addition, greif's team also investigated the fact that... the kak tribunal ignored the massacres of serbs that took place in the vicinity of srebrenica from 1992 to 1995. during the attacks on the most according to co

such great differences, does not correspond to the spirit of reconciliation of consent in bosnia and herzegovinaregion, and this is contrary to the need to maintain peace and stability in the balkans and europe as a whole. bosnia and herzegovina became one of the co-authors of the resolution, but not all members of the presidium of this multinational country approved this initiative. thus, bosnian. it turns out that all the blame was placed on the serbs, and the numerous crimes of other participants in the war in the balkans are ignored: victims among the civilian serbian population are hushed up. demonization of one of the peoples of the former yugoslavia, undermining the dayton peace agreement and approved it by un security council resolution 1031. the impression is that it is. bosnia and herzegovina, so they will propose to the croat-muslim part of the country to peacefully dissolve this federation. one of the signatories of the dayton agreements, all the annexes to them, including the constitution of bosnia and ekaterina radaeva, matvey popov, lead. there is too much controversy around the e

daria grigorova, vladislav chernov, news of the week, from republika srpska, bosnia and herzegovina.ing to new personnel offers president for the so-called power bloc. today. they have been sent to the federation council. there is only one change in the composition of the cabinet of ministers. sergei shaigu is apparently leaving his post, and vladimir putin sees andrei belousov as the new minister of defense. until now, andrei belousov was mikhail mishustin’s first deputy prime minister. and earlier belausov, assistant to president putin, before that minister of economy andrei belousov, a native of moscow, honors degree from moscow state university with a degree in economics cybernetics. in 1981. the president recommends sergei shaig to become secretary of the security council and this appointment has already been completed. the former secretary of the security council, nikolai patrushev, is leaving his post due to a move to a new job. by the way, the chief of the general staff of the russian armed forces, sergei gerasimov, as reported by presidential press secretary dmitry peskov, r

dissolution of this federation. all annexes thereto, including the constitution of bosnia and herzegovina are leaving bosnia and herzegovina. we will do this peacefully. we will not tolerate any act of violence. neighboring serbia stated that the adoption of such a resolution is a violation of international law. dozens of cars with national flags drove through the center of belgrade. there are many posters in the city with the inscription: “we are not a genocidal people.” we remember. orthodox churches in serbia the bells were rung as a sign of protest. anton dadykin, ekaterina radaeva, matvey popov, news. there is too much controversy surrounding the events in serebrenica, since the credibility of the accusations against the serbs raises questions. about this in our information. srebryanitsa, a vast onclave, an area of ​​more than 500 km. in 1992, bosna and herzegovina announced its secession from yugoslavia. srebryanica was then under the control of the serbs, but then the bosnians occupied it and organized an attack by the slavs. in 1995, the unit of the serbian general radk mladic too

security council session after publishing a warning that a new military conflict is brewing in bosnia and herzegovina pushes envoy alerted the council on colonial practices by the west and the country which risk of stripping it of its sovereignty miss deals that was to bosnia and herzegovina has largely been deprived of the status of a sovereign, an independent state. honestly speaking, it is hard to fathom that in the 21st century in the heart of europe with democratic institutions in place. the final say on all events in this country belongs to a citizen of the federal republic of germany. defacto, he acts on behalf of a small group of foreign states whose interests he readily promotes through the so called bosnian authorities with their help if he can know any law or conversely enforced. its application, in essence, behaves like an absolute monarch. over the past 2 and a half years, he has managed to divide the country in a way that no one before him had done. another example for and judges continued to sit in the constitutional court of bosnia and herzegovina, arbitrarily appointed from abroad. c

is this not a mockery of the population of bosnia and herzegovina? imagine that you are 25 years old there, it doesn't matter, 30, 35, you live in... bosnia and herzegovina and you understand that nothing serious will ever happen to you in this country, will you live in this country for a long time? everyone around you speaks the same language as you you speak in croatia, in the same serbia, if you are a serb by origin, but there is one country, a member of the european union and nato, another candidate, why will you sit in bosnia? of course, people leave, well, it's logical, it's logical, and we and we... come to the fact that we can also have such a situation, if we find ourselves in such a situation, that's why i keep saying, we can't to allow russia, using actually the idea. violation of borders, which she herself destroyed, to drive us into such a trap, but we come to the fact that the key to this situation is in the hands of the west, of course the key, of course, is not in our hands, that is, in our hands, relatively speaking, well, not so many

bosnia and herzegovina. with it, this part of the former yugoslavia was henceforth divided into the muslim croatian federation and the republika srpska. to control their borders and support the truce, international forces were introduced there under nato command. only 60 thousand people, half of whom were americans, the serbs, who controlled almost 75% of bosnia and herzegovina, made serious concessions and agreed to retain only 49% of the territory. this was done to end the civil war, which by this time had virtually destroyed the former yugoslavia. in dayton, us president clinton will tell reporters about the key role of slobodan milosevic in ending the civil war and will call the serbian president the guarantor of peace in the balkans. just a few years after these statements, serbia will be subjected to a crushing missile and bomb attack from the united states and nato countries. kosovo, the guarantor of peace, will lose. former minister of information of the republika srpska miroslav tohol believes that t

this is all necessary, this is not a mockery of the population of bosnia and herzegovina, but imaginethat you are 25 years old there, it does not matter, 30, 35, you live in bosnia and herzegovina and understand that you will never have anything serious in this country , you will be long to live in this country, everyone next to you speaks the same language that you speak, in croatia, in this same serbia, if you are... serbian by origin, but there one country is a member of the european union and nato, another is a candidate. why will you sit in bosnia? surely people are leaving? well, that's logical. it is logical. both we and we approach the fact that we too may have such a situation, we will find ourselves in such a situation. that's why i keep saying, we can't allow russia, using in fact the idea of ​​inviolability of borders, which it itself destroyed, to drive us in the occupation but we we come to the fact that the key to this situation is in the hands of the west, of course, the key, of course, is not in our hands, that is, in our hands, relatively speaking, well... there are

serbia is fighting in bosnia and herzegovina, in croatia with the help of paramilitary formations. t they expel the croats, then they expel the serbs from croatia. bosnia and herzegovina is actually a country in which ethnic cleansing is legitimized for the sake of preserving its territorial integrity, but republika srpska does not want to be in bosnia and herzegovina. this state actually does not exist. like a normal institution. let's look at kosovo, its independence is recognized by a number of countries, but they demand from the albanians that... kosovo, that they create autonomy for the serbian municipalities on the border with serbia, whose inhabitants do not want to live in kosovo at all, that is, all of this territory, but no one says, we can transfer them to serbia, because this is the same, because this is the same issue of the territorial integrity of kosovo, which was actually an autonomy within serbia, again, the question is what is the territorial integrity of kosovo, it is just an autonomous region that was created by the yugoslav communists so that the serbs would li

the official musarajevo within a month a draft agreement on the peaceful delimitation of bosnia and herzegovinaill be presented to the federation of bosnia and herzegovina as a country signatory to the dayton peace agreement, which will set out our proposal. official belgrade and baneluka acknowledge the fact of the executions, but categorically oppose the term genocide. an international commission led by the famous israeli historian gideon greif also came to a conclusion. that the events in srebrrenica cannot be called genocide. you can't throw around terms. genocide has a rule, which was defined by jewish lawyer raphael lemkin in 1948. sorry, but what happened in srebrrenice is not genocide. in addition, greif's team also investigated the fact that the hague tribunal ignored the massacres of serbs that took place in the vicinity of srebrenica from 1992 to 1995. during the attacks, according to the most conservative estimates, more than three were killed. such a document clearly does not contribute to reconciliation in the region. daria grigorova and vladislav chernov, balkan news bureau. acro

paramilitary formations, they first expel the croats, then expel the serbs from croatia, bosnia and herzegovinaly a country in which ethnic cleansing is legitimized in order to preserve its territorial integrity, but republika srpska does not want to be in bosnia and herzegovina, this state actually does not exist as a normal institution. let's look at kosovo, its independence is recognized by a number of states, but they demand from the albanians, kosovo, that they create autonomy for the serbian municipalities on the border with serbia, whose residents do not want to live in kosovo at all, that is, annexation of their territory, but... he says : we can them transfer to serbia, because it is, because it is a question of the territorial integrity of kosovo, which was actually autonomous within serbia, again the question of what is the territorial integrity of kosovo, it is just an autonomous region that was created that way. by the communists, so that the serbs would live together with the albanians and control them, at least here. now the soviet union, we have already mentioned transnistria, a

all raises the question of the legitimacy of the existence of the republika srpska within bosnia and herzegovina may even lead to its abolition. the serbs do not agree with this. the authorities of republika srpska will propose the project to the official sarajevo within a month. i think that bosnia and herzegovina will not survive. the adopted resolution is based on the decision of the international court for the former yugoslavia, according to the version of what happened, promoted by the gaga tribunal, in srebrrenica in july 1995, 8.0 bosnian muslims were allegedly killed, most of whom were allegedly civilians. however, some experts consider these data to be overestimated, serbian. the country claims that the death toll is lower, most of them were military personnel, while official belgrade and baneluka admit fact of executions, but categorically oppose the term genocide. an international commission led by the famous israeli historian gideon greif also came to the conclusion that the events in srebrrenica cannot be called genocide. you can't throw around terms. genocide has rules that were de

and joining us from most star in bosnia herzegovina is dw reporter either sophie each. sally b go back to both of you. welcome in this, i want to start with you. you followed the debate and the vote at the general assembly today. i mean, that tell us how did it unfold? well, so the resolution is accepted isn't a simple majority. that means a that 80 here countries voted in favor that is only a simple majority and that is something which is already celebrated by those who are opposing this resolution, which is quite interesting. brand. its interesting very ron voted in favor despite the fact that rush all voted against the resolution. so the kind of muslim brotherhood was more important for you, rondon going with russia. russia is one of the 17 countries which folded against it . and that's a little bit of a surprise here. that's 68 countries of staying, for example, the united arab emirates and they said they want to abstain because they don't want to kind of increase of attention in the region by you to what about where you are, what, what are the survivors of the shru

the islamic republic of iran is a close friend of bosnia and herzegovina and this during defense against enemy aggression has shown in the best way. previously, many officials and political, religious and cultural figures , including the members of the presidential council of bosnia and herzegovina, the president of al-alma, the minister of foreign affairs, and party leaders. with a message of condolence, our sadness and regret for the martyrdom of ayatollah raisi, the president of our country, and hossein amir abdullahian, the minister of foreign affairs, and their companions, to the government and the people , i leave my body to god, my soul to god, my way to you like a bird, but today is wednesday 2 on june 13th of zul-qa'da and may 22nd, zohar province in tehran will be at 12:00 and maghrib azan will be at 1929:00. thank you very much for your attention and companionship with this news series, dear citizens. good day. this is how i come to the provinces and i will travel to the provinces, cities and villages of the country to make sure that the necessary works in the country are real

in bosnia and herzegovina in ninety-five, everything was the other way around, there is no desert, forestsvers are everywhere, which means it is obvious that we are talking about an experimental war. what nato did in 1999 in yugoslavia. he included among the bombing targets petrochemical plants and energy facilities. this was a continuation of the same invivo experiment, that is , an experiment on living organisms. for the first time, for example, it was used. the so-called american softbomb or graphite bomb for bombing energy facilities, that is, in this case, nato wanted to see what the consequences would be for the health of the local population, since back in iraq and bosnia and herzegovina they saw what the consequences of bombing uranus with plutonium were. american government. uranium is absolutely safe and not harmful to health, as observed in serbia and iraq. i am not an expert, but i know of several large-scale consequences that were noticed after the war in many local residents, as well as in the military, who used uranium. we had such experience during the vietnam war: we used

minority, cannot speak like that, er, it’s so difficult , and she doesn't like it very much bosnia and herzegovinaand as i see the last weeks, months, something is happening there, what is actually happening, we can somehow generally... tell there for two minutes that bosnia and herzegovina is a poor country that suffered from all-encompassing aggressions from on all sides, literally, that now there, ah, soon a resolution will be adopted regarding the genocide in serebryanytsia, and the un will admit that it was a genocide and will invite all member countries to include information about it in their educational programs, to celebrate everyone. year anniversary of this tragedy, republika srpska believes that this is simply a step against them, and they will initiate some steps, some actions to separate from the duchy of bosnia, maybe not in the full legal sense, but they will do something to develop independently, and this has already led to aggravation of relations with .. the serbs with the bosnians, the bosnians even began to literally prepare for armed resistance, little by little it somehow ca

today in the republika srpska in bosnia and herzegovina they celebrate the day of remembrance of theews and roma. independent state of croatia. during the second world war , about 700 thousand people were killed in the jasenovac concentration camp by the ustoshi. the prime minister attended the funeral ceremony together with the president of the republika srpska milorad dodik serbia, the speaker of the montenegrin parliament, the russian ambassador, but representatives of western countries did not respond to the invitation. report by the chief of our balkan bureau, daria grigorova. concentration camp yasinov. prisoner of the camp: the ustasha committed a terrible crime in grenovci, where they carried out experiments on people, skinned them and left them hanged, in the house of the ketsman family they captured all the young girls, they did with them whatever they wanted and in the end they set the house on fire, in 1942 at christmas they grabbed everyone, tied up the girls, then they drove them into the church, cut them with knives, killed them, the girls were raped on the altar, the

under a settlement to end, the war bosnia and herzegovina was divided into 2 semi autonomous zones. one for buzzing. the axe and cro outs and one foot buzzing in subs. known as republic, a sab sco relations between the 2 entities are often tens and republic. a sub scale lead is a calling for succession from bosnia and a union with neighboring serbia. the resolution was proposed by rolanda and germany and co sponsored by 15 countries, including the us. proponents say it will promote peace and reconciliation, but it could have significance implications for the future of a country teetering on the edge a. let's go to you in headquarters in new york for the washington bureau chief in his pole. joining us also from mazda in bosnia herzegovina is dw reports to either so fritz sally, beg, of age a welcome. first, let's start with you. at 8 us in new york, a token, so how today's an vote unfolded? no, the resolution was accepted by only a simple majority set. that means that the next year on the, such as the anniversary of the massacre, that will be an international day of comma ration. um,

but it comes with the risk of revising old regional tensions drawing me for most i in bosnia herzegovina is dw reports. i, the sophie just touched base of it. what's the mood intrepid? it's a following, this resolution. well i have to say that this is a little bit more calm then the days before the bolton resolution, because there is no more the tension about what is going to happen is still there is a why keep it's your opinions are divided to basically the find survivors and the extent that you put in seen them. and so now, before i, before me, they feel that someone finally heard them and they welcomed the adoption of the resolution to the very special ed house and the truth and justice. finally, one is said, of course they are referring that's a disability. so once again when, when the genocide happens, so they are very happy about the fact that the one on the other side of serbian leaders will be not in serbia. most of the adoption of the resolution, for example, the president of the stuff said that the resolution is not finding political with a substantial entity. and that the l fo

and joining us also from mazda in bosnia herzegovina is dw reports to either so fritz sally, beg, of age a welcome. first, let's start with you. at 8 us in new york, a token, so how today's an vote unfolded? no, the resolution was accepted by only a simple majority. said that means that the next year on the socialist anniversary of the massacre, that will be an international day of comma ration. um, i think it's worth to have a little bit of a closer look to the vote. only 84 countries voted in favor. so that means it's, as i said, just a simple majority under this kind of interesting that the ron, for example, voted in favor and didn't stick with a russia because of the muslim brotherhood understand that you rush out of course was one of the 19 countries which opposed devoted to other countries about china hungry and as serbia. of course, what is interesting is how many countries upstate in $68.00 countries didn't vote in favor or oppose the resolution saying as the united arab emirates, for example, saying or arguing that they didn't want to deepen the tension in the region. it's e

it's during the war in bosnia and herzegovina . there's a 1995, basically declared as genocide by the international tribunal former yugoslavia that declaration level deep divisions between stubs on both the acts. so it'd be as present of old churches said the new you and moved was an attempt to ask for reparations from bel grade. let's learn more to new york. we go onto you. so i came up and started by for us right now. caleb, can it, can you give us more details about this resolution? sure. all the united nations general assembly is the body that contains every member states. and when this resolution was put for re 84 countries voted for it 19 voted against it. a whopping 68, abstained as a number of countries abstaining, and 22 countries voted no. now 3 of the 5 permanent members of the un security council voted for it. but russia and china that are both permanent members of the un security council. they voted against it. uh serbia and hungary voted for it. uh, slovakia and degrees. uh they, uh, serbia and hungry voted against it

in 1991, we had a conflict in slovenia, then in croatia, then in bosnia and herzegovina.00, there was even a small conflict in north macedonia. meanwhile, in 1999 , serbia came under direct attack from nato. the attack occurred because it would have been impossible to separate the autonomous province of serbia, kosovo and metohija, which were inhabited by residents are of muslim faith and albanian origin. nato illegally stationed its military there. economic situation, which was inevitable due to the collapse of the socialist camp, they began to put pressure on interethnic relations, on the long-standing... remember some long-standing historical conflicts between serbs and croats, between serbs and slovenes, there serbs, macedonians, etc. comrades, we must not give in to those who violate the unity of our country. we cannot give in to something that can harm our country, and we let's protect her. albanians make up the bulk of the population of kosovo, as the serbs themselves claim, the albanians are displacing them. my mother is from kosovo. i have been to kosovo many tim

past strong comments from food judge for the events in the set of minutes during the war in bosnia and herzegovina in 1995 declared as genocide by the international tribunal for the former yugoslavia. a declaration left deep divisions between serbs on both hands. serve you as president, alexander full judges, said the new un moves an attempt to ask for reparations from the great, well that's one more post live to new york pressures, dr. 5 pm. that's our correspondent caleb up and kind of give us more details if you can about this resolution that's really inflaming a number of people as well. it was the united nations general assembly that voted to have july 11th to be an international day of reflection and collaboration. for the events of 1995, now 84 countries voted in favor of this 19 voted against its 68, abstained and 22 countries member states of united nations just didn't vote. now 3 of the 5 permanent members of the un security council voted for it. but russia and china both permanent members of the un security council voted against it. now in the balkans who have serbia and hungary who vot

meeting was convened at the initiative of moscow due to the deterioration of the situation in bosnia and herzegovinashortened country is often called big. nebendze noted that he was in favor. bosnia and herzegovina, the main body responsible for the future of the republic. the diplomat named the initiative. a gigantic memorial built with western money, thousands of tombstones with the names of the dead. with quotations from the koran and the inscription 8,372 victims, and this figure is inconclusive. the granite slab at the entrance clearly states the reason for the death of these people, genocide against bosnian muslims. the fact that srebrenie was a real tragedy in 95 is not denied by anyone, nor muslims, nor serbs, but what’s important is that through many years of efforts of the western press and non-state foundations, the silver coin was turned into a kind of tool. which western politicians take advantage of, this is a real, undisguised, very cynical play on the blood and feelings of those who lost their loved ones here. the muslims who died in that war were brought to this memorial from all ov

one thing is obvious, the initiators of today's decision are acting deliberately, pushing bosnia and herzegovinads confrontation without regard to the price they paid during the civil war in the nineties, then 1000 people died in bloody tragedies this war in relation not only to the bashnyaks, but... to the country and the region as a whole, all this is cynical and hypocritical, however, what is even more surprising, the main sponsor of this resolution was decided to be germany, the country that in the 20th century sparked two world wars, killed millions of people in concentration camps, is responsible for mass crimes in africa and took an active part in the collapse of yugoslavia and the bombing of sarajevo in 1995, and is now trying to teach others from the rostrum of the general assembly. about the importance of national reconciliation, are convinced that germany has no moral right to even mention the term genocide in relation to anything other than its heinous crimes. china also voted against the resolution today, as the country’s representative stated before the vote. a hasty vote on this p

all raises the question of the legitimacy of the existence of the republika srpska within bosnia and herzegovinae serbs do not agree with this. authorities of republika srpska will propose to official sarajevo within a month a draft agreement on the peaceful delimitation of bosnia and herzegovina. the serbian side claims that the number of deaths is lower, most of them were military personnel, while official belgrade and baneluka admit the fact of the executions, but categorically oppose the term genocide. an international commission led by the famous israeli historian gideon greif also came to the conclusion that the events in srebrrenica cannot be called genocide. you can't waste your time terms. genocide has rules, which were defined by the jewish jurist raphael lemkin in... in 948. sorry, but what happened in srebrrenica is not genocide. in addition, greif's team also investigated the fact that the hague tribunal ignored the massacres of serbs that took place in the vicinity of srebryanica from 1992 to 1995. during the attacks, according to conservative estimates, more than 3.00 local reside

one thing is clear: the initiators of today’s decision are acting deliberately, pushing bosnia and herzegovinaermany, a country that in the 20th century sparked two world wars, killed millions of people in concentration camps, is responsible for mass crimes in africa, and took an active part in the collapse of yugoslavia and the bombing of sarajevo in 1995, is now trying from the rostrum of the general assembly to teach others about the importance of national reconciliation. are convinced that germany has no moral right to even mention the term genocide in relation to anything other than its heinous crimes. also china voted against the resolution today, as the country’s representative stated before the vote. a hasty vote on this project, where there are still such big differences, does not correspond to the spirit of reconciliation of consent in bosnia and herzegovina in the region, and this is not the answer. according to the department, from april 2016 to october 2023, shamarin received money from the general director of perm telephone plant telta llc, alexey vysoky, and the chief accountant

all raises the question of the legitimacy of the existence of the republika srpska within bosnia and herzegovinaot agree with this. the authorities of the republika srpska will propose to the official sarajevo within a month a draft agreement on the peaceful delimitation of bosnia and herzegovina. the adopted resolution is based on. for a decision international court for the former yugoslavia, according to the version of events promoted by the gaga tribunal in srebrjanica in july 95, 8,000 bosnian muslims were allegedly killed, most of whom were said to be civilians. however, some experts consider these data to be overestimated. the serbian side claims that the number of deaths is lower, most of them were military personnel, while official belgrade and baneluka admit the fact of the executions, but... categorically oppose the term genocide. international commission under the leadership of the famous israeli historian gideon greif also came to the conclusion that the events in srebrrenica cannot be called genocide. you can't throw around terms. genocide has a rule that was defined by jewish lawye

and when you speak to serves their consignment, get whether subs here in bosnia and herzegovina or in neighboring sub. yeah. so for example, the bosnian serb leader success and this and pro russian leader mueller. i thought he was here in 7. and it's a head of the bose. and he use the opportunity once again to call for us to assess an offer. we can subscribe to quote, for its independence from bosnia and herzegovina, and he once again denied 7. and it's a genocide, even though it is illegal in the countries with the not genocide, never did lives. the resolution itself does not mention bosnian serb, it does not assume any kinds of collective responsibility. the purpose of this resolution is to commemorate that evidence of genocide on july 11th to condemn genocide denial altogether. but we already heard that the international courts, like i c, j and i, c t y in have already determined that the crimes committed here in 1995 committed constituted a raw, the genocide. the ends of both in sub military and political leadership was found guilty, but nevertheless, a bosnian serbs are sales den

the document was promoted by representatives of bosnia and herzegovina, germany and rwanda.thors were mainly western countries. - said the american secretary of state. according to blinken, the united states is pursuing a policy of visa restrictions towards georgia, which will be applied to persons responsible for undermining democracy or complicit in this undermining. as well as to their family members. at the same time , the prime minister of georgia stated that the law on transparency of foreign influence adopted by parliament has only one goal: to make public the financial statements of non-governmental organizations receiving millions of dollars from abroad, and spending these funds on subversive political activities. everything that is happening in ukraine now is aimed at ensuring that the overdue zelensky fulfills his obligations to the west. about it.

we understand that croatia, bosnia and herzegovina are not serbia., but relatively speaking, if you take. geographically, i think you have covered and analyzed what is happening in serbia, xi jinping should implement after france his visit to serbia, what do you think to expect, what are xi jinping's interests in serbia, what can they achieve? well, we must admit that china and serbia have very old relations, since the beginning of the 90s, and it must be said that china actively to... helped serbia in the situation of 1999, when nato bombed serbia, so to speak, because of its reluctance. to withdraw his troops from kosovo with the fact that there was an expulsion of almost 2 million people, well , actually, a huge incident happened, exactly 25 years ago, the chinese embassy was bombed in belgrade, and actually, it was half destroyed, no no no not seen in history diplomacy, this happened at night, but nato apologized, said that it was an accidental misfortune, but everyone understood well that the chinese embassy was a new building, on which modern a

bosnia and herzegovina is actually a country in which ethnic cleansing is legitimized to preserve itsal integrity, but republika srpska does not want to be in bosnia. this state actually does not exist as a normal institution. let's look at kosovo, its independence is recognized by a number of countries, but they demand from the albanians of kosovo that they create autonomy for the serbian municipalities on the border with serbia, whose inhabitants do not want to live in kosovo at all, with all this territory of their own, but no one does not say, we can transfer them to serbia, because this well, because this is the question of the territorial integrity of kosovo, which actually was. what is the territorial integrity of kosovo? it's just an autonomous region that was so created by the yugoslav communists. for the serbs to live together with the albanians and control them, at least here. now the soviet union. we have already mentioned transnistria, abkhazia and south ossetia, where did they expel the entire georgian ethnic population from? ukraine?

bosnia and herzegovina, germany. no moral right to even mention the term genocide in relation to anythinghan their heinous crimes. let us recall that the un itself, in the hall where we are today, was created because crimes of nazi germany in order to prevent such crimes against humanity once and for all. serbian president aleksandar vucoi also stated that the adopted document would worsen the situation in the region. residents of the country organized a car rally in protest and said that they would be called perpetrators of genocide. for 678 applications from 76 russian regions, which is especially symbolic: the award ceremony takes place in the new building of the tretyakov gallery on kodashovskaya embankment. this is the first event that this building has hosted. the likhachev national prize was held as part of the international festival intermuseum. the award ceremony for the winners was the culmination of the first day. autonomous non-profit organization kolomna theater of educational tourism. kolomna passad. the best museum route was the project of the suranovs' house in the kolomen