it was bryonn bain, aka bostick. i did not know who that was. they have given up my information and i've done myself in jail again for a crime i did not commit. this time i said, hell no, i am suing everybody. the police, the state of new york. the public defender came to me -- this is the craziest part of the situation. the public defender who is there to defend your constitutional rights -- she came in to see me with plastic cause and a surgical mask. i saw her walking around with all the rest of the brothers. i thought maybe she had something that she did not want to give us. [laughter] that is righteous. i respect that. whenever you have to do. then she got me into the interrogation room and she said to me, you say you have education. where did you go to school, high school? public-school of new york. this does that add up. i skipped two grades before college. where did you go to college? how did you pay for college? you went to grad school? how did you pay for law school? what did that have to do with my case? i was just going with the flow

transmission could be broadcast in another courtroom and the courthouse in which the charnel proceeding bostick in place but any dissemination beyond the courthouse prohibited. and you can see some of the language of the supreme court used in that decision at least five justices used in prohibiting the transmission of these proceedings. there was a very vigorous dissent written by justice breyer and supported by four of the justices. the question is where is this repute or cameras in the courtroom come from? well, the modern disrepute i think traces to the case in the early 1960's. the prosecution of an alleged swindle by the name of billy estes who claimed in association with the then vice president of the united states lyndon johnson, and of course was that connection that drew the public interest. in september, 1962, there was a today during a broadcast on radio and television devoted solely to the motions for the continuance of the trial and the motion to prohibit broadcasting of the trial. it was as described by the supreme court not a scene of judicial serenity. 12 cameramen were in the c

transmission could be broadcast in another courtroom and the courthouse in which the charnel proceeding bostick in place but any dissemination beyond the courthouse prohibited. and you can see some of the language of the supreme court used in that decision at least five justices used in prohibiting the transmission of these proceedings. there was a very vigorous dissent written by justice breyer and supported by four of the justices. the question is where is this repute or cameras in the courtroom come from? well, the modern disrepute i think traces to the case in the early 1960's. the prosecution of an alleged swindle by the name of billy estes who claimed in association with the then vice president of the united states lyndon johnson, and of course was that connection that drew the public interest. in september, 1962, there was a today during a broadcast on radio and television devoted solely to the motions for the continuance of the trial and the motion to prohibit broadcasting of the trial. it was as described by the supreme court not a scene of judicial serenity. 12 cameramen were in the c