both plain speakers and clear thinkers. both alpha males. both had an acrimonious relationship with the media. both endured massive battles with the establishment in their own political party. both had predecessors that were considered very weak. of course, winston churchill had neville chamberlin and donald trump had barack obama. so there are actually incredible parallels between the times and the men and that's why i wrote the book. >> when we look back at winston churchill in history, we always picked him as beloved and with unanimous support. >> it certainly wasn't that way, peter. it certainly wasn't that way. look, winston churchill, much like donald trump, was a disrupter. he was somebody that was bold, he was somebody that was brash. he was someone that decided to do things a different way, and whenever somebody like that comes into the fold, often the people that have been in the fold for a long time really doesn't like it and do everything they can to stop it. and in fact, in my book, we often excerpts from british national newspa

sides both indians and the chinese. developing days these assets and now in the warm weather there are just small 'd border patrols along the region leading to more fictions between front line officers which you know a lot of them are resolved but some of them clearly could go out of control so i think if only i just want to point out that there's actually a lack of consensus on the both side as to the line of actual control so. that and that really leads to the perception on both sides that the other side is it is being aggressive and that they themselves are only responding to the pressure from the other side so i think both sides have that perception so why has it been so difficult to establish an official border along that there was. a mechanism set up in 2003 of special representative to sort this out somebody is somebody stalling i think. the principle problem is that the chinese have time on their site they can well afford to stretch this out and they are the ones who have the most expansive claims so let's be cl

both worked with braddock. both warned him, don't do it. these native americans will cut you to slices, which they did. famously, braddock said back to franklin, they may cut your poor colonial militia to slices, but they will not know how to beat the british army. they did, including braddock, who washington carried back and buried under the road traveled by franklin's wagons. you have the two people working together then. they realized we can only win by working together. these colonies can't work independent. they have to work together. they also learned that you cannot trust the british. they don't care about us, they only care about themselves. so after the war, they drew a proclamation line and said you cannot settle in the west. this is what sets franklin and washington off because they thought public virtue would come by people having economic freedom, economic opportunity, political freedom, political opportunity, and that was the frontier. if you lose that, you lose what makes america special. so right from the get go, they had fo

if nationalist opinion both countries. becomes becomes quite strong you see sure and i think it will be if if if this goes on for much longer in the media and that's going to pressure both governments to adopt tougher measures against each other leading to a high chance of escalation sumit let me move on to what adams says that we have an increasingly assertive china on the xi jinping on a more overtly nationalist india and in the render modi will that cause problems if this continues if these confrontations continue. i certainly think so but peculiarly if these chinese provocations continue because you see there is a larger pattern over here faced with criticism on their lack of transparency on the covert 19 issue china has also engaged in what the era of further into themselves as wolf warrior diplomacy there a very aggressive stance which suggests that the problem is really didn't emanate in china they have floated all manner of bizarre theories about the united states being responsible for having released this virus on

both love their country and both clear thinkers, both alpha males, both had an acrimonious relationship with the media, both endured massive apples with the establishment in their own political party. both had red assessors that were considered very weak. winston churchill had neville chamberlain and donald trump had barack obama so there are incredible parallels between the time in the men and that's why he wrote the book. >> host: nick adams what made look back at winston churchill in history we often picture him as beloved and with unanimous support. >> guest: is certainly wasn't that why peter, is certainly wasn't that way. winston churchill much like donald trump was a disruptor. he was somebody that was bold. he was somebody that was brash. he was someone that decided to do things a different way and whenever somebody like that comes into the fold, often the people that have been in the fold for a long time really don't like it. in fact in my book we offer excerpts from raiders national newspapers written in the early 1940s. i can tell you that those excerpts are from british nati

and since they both had the spirit and they both did like, they both took counsel and they both didn't crave credit, they both willingly -- franklin almost compulsively so, tried to share credit with others washington, too. that was her nature. that allowed them to work together. there's another element. franklin was a humorist. he was a storyteller. a very clever storyteller. some of his stories and observations might be a little bit on the off-color side. washington was not a storyteller. he was very stern but he loved to joke, especially a little bit of an off-color joke. while franklin was a back slapper, and i can imagine washington ever slapping a back, the pairing worked quite well and they both loved books. they both had things in common. they both were very proud of their houses and like to show them off. they both were wonderful entertainers. franklin didn't used to drink but he learned to drink wine in france and came back as an expert at one. washington always loved wine and then you how to share that, share their commonalities. they were the type of people who like other p

i was familiar with both men. and works winston churchill given that united kingdom's work with australia. i will say that americans are very familiar with that. i think it's fair to say that most americans don't really take all that much of an interest in what goes on in other places. american is so big and powerful who really cares what is going on elsewhere but winston churchill was an exception. it was an exception for a variety of reasons. he was actually half american. number two he is the only person in the history of the united states to have ever received honorary citizenship and number three and i think this is my most favorite point of all. he was very american. he was a bald guy. he refused to conceal his true self. very american in his disposition. particularly back then. they where the long tradition of them. in england it was really remarkable for someone like winston churchill to come along the united kingdom their political culture is a prize in timidity and moderation. the british bulldog to emer

thank you both for being here. i want to speak about the primary and secondary corporate credit facilities. as of today, those facilities are available to companies that have ratings from public rating agencies like s&p and moody's. as you know, that can be a very expensive process. some companies don't want to go through the cost or rigmarole. bese companies often tend to privately owned, sometimes family-owned. they can be very large employee bases. we have some in arkansas that are employing thousands. i think all on this committee, maybe all 50 states, have companies in this category. oftentimes, they sell loans directly to insurance companies like life insurers that are rated by the national association of insurance commissioners. are the functional equivalent of a public ratings agency like an s&p or moody's. secretary, what is the possibility of opening up those facilities to companies that are selling those kind of loans with those kind of credit worthiness ratings? sec. mnuchin: i appreciate the opportunit

both countries are permanent members of the u.n. security council. there are many areas where the two countries can and should work with each other in tackling both traditional and non-traditional challenges. there are also extensive exchanges between the two countries in the economic, trade, scientific, technological, cultural and other fields. so it is fair to say that there is extensive common interest between china and the u.s. both countries stand to gain from cooperation and lose from confrontation. getting sino-u.s. relationship right is in the interest of people of both countries and the whole world. given the importance of this relationship, any problem that occurs in this relationship have been a cause for concern for the international community. as for cold war, you know that we have all along rejected the cold war mentality. and decoupling between major economies will do neither side any good. it is also harmful to the world. [speaking chinese] >> i believe we should continue to work together to follow through on the important consensus r

both have predecessors that were very weak. and that neville chamberlain and donald trump and barack obama. for the times in the men and that's why i wrote the book. >>host: when you look back at winston churchill we picture him as beloved and with unanimous support. >> it certainly wasn't that way. winston churchill much like donald trump was a disruptor. he was somebody bold and brash and decided to do things a different way. whenever somebody like that comes in to the fold often those that have been there for a long time really don't like it to do everything they can to stop it. and in my book we offer excerpts from british national newspapers from the early 19 forties and i tell you those excerpts were from british national newspapers referring to churchill he would say you are reading the "washington post" or new york times and it was about donald trump so similar are the criticisms and identical are the accusations that they don't listen to anybody around them it's only their gut instinct that they are too optimistic and

i'm like cornel in that respect. [ laughter ] we're both christians.stians. >> you're both christians. and you respect each other enough to disagree and to engage in a serious and rigorous ntest of ideas in a civil and respectful way you teach a course at princeton university and you also have in common that you re both guests on the original "firing line with william f. buckley jr." >> mm-hmm.t' >>a very great honor. very great honor. >> there's a clear affection h tween the two of you, wh >> he's so lovable. we c't help it. [ laughter ] >> in fact, i think it's deeper than civility and it's even deeper than respect. i think we've got a genuine love for one another. i love this brother. i revel in his humanity.me we spend good ogether. and so we just always want to send a sign to the natiothat deep down in your heart, you know love is not reducible to politics. >> well, i not only love brother cornel, i admire him and i admire him for those virtues -- for hesty and for integrity. and he sets an example for me.ng he's inspio me. we may disagree about politics, person who says what he

and donald trump it's brazil and joey are both sonata president both on the continues to downplay this pandemic even as the number of deaths reported in brazil surpasses china's unhappy with his health ministers more conventional cautious approach both are not all fired him he then spoke at a protest demanding that the military intervene to get people back to work that's an elected president talking on the airwaves however 2 of brazil's biggest media players headquarter t.v. and s.p.t. still have his back and where there is yield a ball so not all is in denial or simply playing politics they're standing by our starting point this week is the capital. as we use this as a region as good as it is and it is you know it's not the brazil doesn't do social distancing 24 of the 27 states have those measures in place it's just that the president doesn't do. so balsa not has been downplaying the risks the coronavirus right now he's been saying in the media that scientists are trying to create some sort of panic in society exaggerating the risk and meanwhile he's been going out in public not wear

in particular and in the euro zone that is something that we'll probably hear in a few minutes from both corn and merkel and this comes as european countries step by step gradually reopening and changing some of those restrictions that we have been covering both for a very long time obviously all focused on national circumstances so each country obviously making decisions based on those national circumstances so that means and now the focus more and more is on how to fight this internationally and in particular when we look at the economic aspect of it all because it is clear that the european union countries and again in particular the eurozone will suffer very hard from this crisis there are already reports that the eurozone could contract 7.7 percent this year we've also heard for example from germany's economy minister a few weeks ago that germany is preparing for his worst recession in decades so obviously now all european countries are trying to find common ways out of this in fact if you are focusing on that economic aspect and what we're going to hear today in particular if those

republicans and democrats in both houses for variety of reasons. i could, of course, be wrong, but i doubt it why would we not agree to allow the states to use the $150 billion that we have already appropriated to them to address shortfalls in their revenue base as a result of the coronavirus >> senator kennedy, i want to comment on first thing i have no intention of doing what you've just described nor -- >> i don't want to debate that it's been done in the past it was done last time. i'm not being critical of you. >> there were 20 or 30 senators of both republicans and democrats that participated in the detailed analysis of the last bill. >> i understand, but there are a lot of more members of the house and senate i'm not being critical i'm just telling you that's the way it works around here and we all know it. why would not be supportive -- we've already spent $150 billion in the tariff act. we know they will have shortfall. we may not be able to pass another bill i think it's less than 50% chance of passing another bill why would we not allow

you cannot be both with yet you will. good food descriptions sound up to tell using even for the owners so how to choose just had food industry is telling us what to feed our pets really more based on what they want to sell us then was necessarily good for the pet turns out that food may not be a soap the people believe we have animals that have you know diabetes in arthritis and they have auto immune disorders that cut allergies we are actually creating these problems is a huge epidemic of problems all of them i believe can be linked to very simple problem of diet and some dog owners so heartbreaking stories about their pets last treats the larger corporations are not very interested in proving or disproving the value of their food because they're already making a $1000000000.00 on it and there's no reason to do that research. we go to work so you straight home. i am max kaiser this is the kaiser report you know stacy back in the 1970 s. i recall subliminal advertising was illegal you know like soft drink companies would

both of them would attending graduate from miami. both would marry miami ends. both would have sons born on the same day, who are both graduating from miami today. two of our other children, john and alice, are also miami graduates. our granddaughter grace is concluding her first year here and our grandson brian will be starting in the fall. your experience as seniors at miami has certainly been unique. when i ran for governor, i did not expect that i would be dealing with a once in a 100 years pandemic. as i look back on how ohioans have dealt with this coronavirus, the first chapter was really written right here on this campus. in january, some of your fellow from china anded exhibited symptoms of the coronavirus. it all began. the students in miami did what they should have done. themselvesolating and miami's health service and the state department getting involved. the tests came back negative. the ohio coronavirus story had begun. springtimebeauty of surrounds us, as we weary of this virus, i'm reminded of what winston churchill told the british people at a

both the opening and closings are musicals. the opening night, i will make s you mine directed by lynn chen. what i love is it is a third in a trilogy of feature fians. for me, as soone who is in asian american cinema, i have seen films have trilogies, that is prettyamazing. it is a really beautiful film. our closinflis fruit this is a film shot in san francisco 10 years ago so it is a 10 year anniversary, it is ona sing- one of my favorite filmmakers, h.p. mendoza, is making this unique and the two of us have talked about how we can use the online space for new ways of being creative and interacting with audiences. i'm excited for ople to check that out. >> fruit fly looks at what it means to be asian and gay in the mission district. you look at politics also. you ha two documentaries, what did yo learn frthese that could be applied to the 2020 election cycl >> one of them, first vote, what i love about it, it really explores asian american american republicans, and it does it in a nuanced thoughtful way, where it is not black

oferviewer: i know that part the reason that message is so important to both of you and for both of you to get out of the community is because so many people have delayed elective procedures and also necessary health care because of fear of and going to the hospital would put them at risk. do you want to talk a little about the dangers of delaying necessary medical care? dr. boutros: well, i would say people toly told limit contact with the health care system, hospital systems and the like because we wanted to limit unnecessary exposure for vulnerable patients and health care workers and that has worked. where the largest numbers of electronic medical records is showing data that for over 3 million patients, that we have seen an abrupt drop between 86 & -- 86% and 94% for cervical cancer,: cancer, breast cancer, prepared -- compared to prior years. admissions for heart attacks have decreased 45%, strokes by 38%, and childhood immunizations are also decreased by 44%. neglect thee can't proven medical interventions of preventive care. because weoncerned are likely to have a far worse seco

thank you both of you for being today. chairman powell, you talked about how we will not be able to solve the economic crisis without solving the public health crisis, which i agree with. secretary mnuchin, you said we need to reopen the economy in a "thoughtful way, can which i also agree with. seems to me the important part of being thoughtful is making sure americans have accurate information about what is going on. i have no doubt he will be surprised to hear that a lot of us were taken back when, a couple of days of so i go -- a couple of days or so ago, we heard eric trump, acting as a surrogate for his father, saying that they -- the democrats -- are taking away donald trump's greatest tool, to be able to going to an arena filled with 50,000 people every time, so that they will -- you watch, they will milk at every single day between now and november 3, and guess what, after november 3, the coronavirus will magically disappear and everybody will be input to reopen -- will be able to reopen. this is the kind of misin

in these 2 channels both the matter can reach both say secular low income brazilians and i say with jenny in fairness though that's not something that started with bo so the . bit it has always been. allied to the present ho ever the present is so the same people that now endorse far right politics of also the also indoor center left politics of the workers' party because it is convenient for them to be. the presence of good graces. and it's profitable the brazilian government spends a lot of money on television advertising and also not has been directing that money away from channels he doesn't like to those he does back in 2017 globo the most watched network got almost 50 percent of the government's total ad spend when both sonata took power he cut that to about 15 percent in the quarter and s.p.t. are up to about 40 percent each so when brazilian journalists say it pays to stay in the government's good books they're not being metaphorical. as well as this might open the mainstream media with some exceptions have a loving relationship with our president for most of the time they're cruc

my husband and i both run small businesses, so trying to keep both of those businesses viable and havingd doing some home—schooling has created a really high pressure environment for both of us as parents, which obviously then reflects on the children well. the government says this is about small steps. more guidance will be issued, but will parents and teachers have enough confidence for children to return to classroom discussion mark elaine dunkley, bbc news, cheshire. the leaders of all the devolved nations say they're keeping the "stay at home, save lives" advice meaning there are now clear differences in how lockdown restrictions will apply in the different areas of the uk. so what does the new guidance mean if you live in wales, for example, but work in england? or if you live in england but want to visit wales? our wales correspondent, hywel griffith, has been looking into what the changes mean. the prime minister has given us his road map. but are the borders clearly marked? for the people in chepstow, it should be straightforward. they live in wales under welsh lockdown laws. th

extends --it extends both u.s. law and the arkansas law regardless of race, but it did not eliminate any language that was in the major crimes act already paired that was a portion of u.s. law. regardless of what happened pre-statehood. we can debate that, but regardless, there is no disagreement that the major crimes act applies of its own term at statehood. statehood itself was a major event that transferred, obviously transferred oklahoma from a territory to a state. >> can you cite a single state under the major crimes act that was thereafter prosecuted in federal court? >> this court has made clear that events on the ground -- or: counsel,ayor it has been pointed out that some of the penalties in federal court would be higher than those enforced in state court. do you disagree that some defendants who might be entitled , if you were to win, some defendants who would be entitled to challenge their convictions would choose not to because the risk would be too high for them? >> that is exactly right, your honor.

hello to both of you. we will look at the times first.he headline, see friends and family affect lockdown. i have highlighted the word friends with and s on the end because it looks at what the times is doing, looking to the future. not focusing on this see friend, singular, at the moment. yeah, i was quite confused as well as taupe whether it was about meeting one friend. does that mean one friend at a time or doesn't mean you have one friend for the whole of the period? it seems to me and one friend at a time. the times does seem to be looking ahead and notjust at the next couple of weeks. one of the details is the government is looking at ways to reintroduce large gathering such as weddings, which is interesting. it's quite hard to see how that will be possible with social distancing, but it's encouraging that they are looking at it. another detail what i think will go down quite well with a lot of people is that sport will be reintroduced behind closed doors. it does sort of feel like it's notjust about getting the economy started eve

oil tankers could be just days away from arriving in venezuela in a bid to ease fuel shortages there both countries are sanctioned by the u.s. and the white house says it's considering a response to the shipment venezuela says its military will escort the tankers assoon as they enter its territory now ship tracking shows the 1st of the 5 tankers left the iranian port city of banda bass in march analysts say they're between 89 and 99 percent full judging by how they're sitting in the water the 1st tanker fortune is expected to arrive in venezuela in the next $4.00 to $5.00 days or venezuela's ambassador to the u.n. has warned that any attempts to stop the tankers will be illegal. the threat of use of military force against by you any and tank just with fuel that are on route to venice when in violation i'm orders of the freedom of freedom of trade and navigation in case the threat is about the allies it would constitute an actual aggression as even union vessel and against events when an equal as a whole in this context i shot a child you stretched that i neighborhood blockade is an act of

and donald trump it's brazil and joey are both are not our president both are not all continues to downplay this pandemic even as the number of deaths reported in brazil surpasses china's unhappy with his health ministers more conventional

the extent of venezuela and iran say the trade is a win win for both countries iran got much needed gold venezuela the oil and both got to send a message to the united states alexia brian el jazeera well let's get the view from tehran as robin joins us live so what iranian saying about all this. well fawley senior iranian leadership have been preempting any sort of possible military or political diplomatic reaction from the united states to these shipments as such official letters have been sent to both the swiss embassy the liaison between iran and the united states here into iran as well as to the united nations the foreign ministry protesting any potential reaction from the u.s. and late last night iran's defense minister brigadier general amir hatami echoed a lot of the remarks that civilian leaders have already been making for several days he said any disruption would be considered piracy and as against international maritime law he also said that any disruption to this voyage will receive a decisive and crushing response familiar words from the senior leaders here in iran when it c

so 2 men both who would be prime minister and both who will theoretically get the chance but as we know even just one year in israeli politics is a long time that alone more than 3 years harry for that in west jerusalem to set the thing for us well after more than 500 days of caretaker administration and political crisis during which time we've seen 3 inconclusive elections we've seen benjamin netanyahu go from a suspect in 3 corruption cases to being indicted with his trial due to start next sunday at last israel saw a government sworn in but what kind of a government will it be it'll be the biggest in israel's history swelling to 36 ministries a way of trying to satisfy demands on both sides with the 2 men at the top of each side benny gantz that knows former rival and netanyahu both sworn in immediately as alternate prime minister and prime minister netanyahu will go 1st for 18 months and then dance for the last 18 months but even as netanyahu hands over power if he does he will still retain the position of alternate prime minister something seen as important as he tries to fight off

but both these sides, william f. buckleys and william shaftlies, as well as the tom hadens agreed the only way to fix the broken system of misgovernance and, quote, establish greater democracy in america as sds put it was to abolish the political party stalemate in favor of what sds called two genuine parties centered around issues and essential values. as it put it in the statement. and both sides set out to do just that. the left liberal reformers who stripped cold war conservative democrats of power through reforms while conservatives purged rockefeller republicans from their ranks. all this was backed up by congressional liberals who launched a decade-long season of inquiries beginning in 1966 and ending with the hearings in 1975, which dragged deep state dirty laundry into the harsh light of public scrutiny. in its wake, the national security establishment found itself under siege and adrift. a lost tribe of neocons, wandering in the wilderness of electoral politics that was suddenly dominated by insurgents such

in the fight against the virus is incredibly important with both in the e.u. but also in the g. 7 and g. 20 countries colleagues we can be very pleased that we have all pulled together so well in recent weeks but i see a duty here the duty that what we have achieved so far not to be endangered. since march we have lived with all kinds of types of deprivation and some cases even our rights we have sacrificed and if we do now it risk a relapse that would be so depressing it would be such a shame if we end up locking down again. none of us want that to happen so let us have both courage and prudence let as slowly step by step open our public life but always be aware of the developments of the pandemic and work and in schools cafes and sports associations let us return to these places but let us retain hygiene rules always washing our hands keeping a distance and being careful for others i believe that if we remain consistent in our hygiene rules and therefore prevent a relapse we will all benefit because then both is possible in the next phase of handling both th

both sides set out to do just that. the liberal reformers who stripped cold war conservative democrats of power through reforms while conservatives purged rockefeller republicans from their ranks. all this was backed up by congressional liberals who launched a decade-long session of inquiries beginning in 1966 and ending with the hearings in 1975, which dragged deep state dirty laundry into the harsh light of public scrutiny. in its wake, the establishment found itself under siege and adrift. a lost tribe of neocons wandering in the wilderness of electoral politics that was heavily dominated by insurgents is at -- such as jimmy carter and ronald reagan. but it sheltered in place within the security place it helped to build, going down to build what we call the deep state,. only to reemerge with new power after 9/11, but perhaps with no greater public legitimacy. to conclude, my takeaways for this history as we puzzle over the place of the deep state in our current politics and what discourse about it teaching people med

and the interest oner both sides why shouldn't that be the right standard? >> i would not say that i have the apa expert but what is the authorization? i just want to be clear what isn't totally clear is prior to the trump rule the case that if they objected and then the insurance company under the accommodation provided the benefit you still got a seamless no-cost benefit. that just doesn't expand that exemption for the for profit institution it will completely change the norm and what it previously was to cover the third-party that objection is what is wrong. and was the prior rule a fact or a violation that you had to go to a proposition rather than someone say i want out , now to say i want out in my employees are out from getting the benefit so then the question that could beach could be arbitrary and capricious that there is the authorization with that religious exemption for the first time ever a moral exemption. are those authorized and required by rfra? that is interesting. there was little talk that argument really wasn't advanced which is surprisi

job both women did in he case and how striking how yevket effectual both were. it's a very intimate give and take, very cofferingsal. here we have a formal running down of the jums in order. they all asked questions, including justice thomas. they were quite respectful of each other, said some jokes. but with the exception of a couple of times people getting on mute, it ran smoothly. let's begin with the questions that struck you most significant. the very first question of the argument was that of chief justice roberts. he said counsel, you mentioned goodyear race but you didn't quote the language. the primary significance of the mark to the public shall be the primary criteria. she said good yeever had a different test. shouldn't this attach chute which came later matter more than good-year? what was the significance of that question and more generally, which questions by the justice would you like to share with our viewers and friends as being especially significant? >> i actually think that first question is really helpful and it connects this case to actual

thank you both for coming on today guys .thanks for having me so i want to start let's start with just looking at the coverage across the board of the spread of them except for steve what do you feel has been the best and worst aspects of the u.s. news media's handling of this outbreak steve you can go 1st. wow the best and worst aspect i think you know you hit it on the head when you talked about that the partisanship the blame game the fake news by omission which which i'll throw in has been it's been unavoidable and it's been consistent so i think while the coverage i think it depends who you're watching and i think that that poll would you probably get to in a little bit will show that there's a party line disagreement on how much they trust the media and how good a job they think they're doing i mean you got. a sin maybe murder that was committed in new york state by governor cuomo has orders to take sick patients have put them in nursing homes and the mainstream media really couldn't care about that now the more conserv

coming for having this great discussion with us pleasure as always having to both on.thank you guys. are going to break remember that you could also start watching our show on demand for the brand new portable t.v. which is available on smartphones for google play store or searching portable t.v. or you can stream with your t.v. by downloading the portable t.v. up on apple t.v. and online and portable t v coming up we examined the devaluing of black communities across the united states with dr great very office fascinating book you know your price valuing black lives and property of america's black city state through watching. international memorial awards are now open for entries the media professionals are eligible whether you're a freelance journalist works real terms of media or part of a global news platform to participate. published works in video or written for much go to award dot altie dot com and enter now. your money just like to make your children you know when the should. you say experience a corner in the way it's an experience we have no experience of co

tensions are flaring up once again between the united states and china both over the handling of the krona virus and communications technologies from wa on monday's spokesman from always said new u.s. sanctions on the telecom giant threaten to devastate the company. in its relentless pursuit to tighten its stranglehold on our company the us government has decided to proceed and ignored completely the concerns expressed by many companies and industry associations. this action this decision is both arbitrary and permission is and threatens to undermine the entire industry worldwide. the new rule will impact the expansion maintenance and continuous operations of networks worth hundreds of billions of dollars that we have rolled out across more than $170.00 countries this comes days after the trouble ministration restricted the company's ability to use american made chips this includes taiwan's t s m c which supplies over 90 percent of while we smartphone chips for more we are joined by dean of the miami business school. john thanks for your time thank you for joining us today now while