jointly between sudan and ethiopia to demarcate this boundary and that boundary commission was establishednd authorized to put pillars on the boundary line >> which major -- did exactly and he drew the line and he drew the map. he also took the coordinates of the boundary pillars that he actually erected along the boundary from 1903 from the point of this meeting with ethiopian-sudan boundary. in fact, he changed the description in the 1902 agreement -- >> i'm sorry -- i'm sorry to interrupt you. it's just that we don't have a lot of time for this discussion. we know that it's a disputed territory. may i gist and you, what is it that sudan would like to see going forward when it comes to this dispute right now? >> well, -- i think the dispute is a novel thing. and the boundary was never disputed, even in 972. the exchange recognized the boundary pillars erected by major guinn and that is an exchange of note from the minister of foreign affairs of ethiopia. it was proposed and sudan accepted that, so there is no boundary disputes between sudan and ethiopia. also, the established 2001 bounda

be stablished jointly between sudan an ethiopian to demarcate this boundary and that bound boundary commission was established and authorize. to put us on the boundary line which is. which image again did exactly and he drawn the line and he drowned a mob he also took the decor didn't it of the boundary pillars that he actually erected along the boundary in 1000 or 30 from their point of this meeting with its european sudan boundary in fact he changed the description in the in 1000 or 2 agreement as you cited above i'm sorry sudan. miles i'm sorry interrupt you it is just that you know we don't have a lot of for this discussion we know that it's a disputed territory magister ask you what is it that sudan would like to see going forward when it comes to this dispute right now. well. i think i think the dispute is a novel thing and the boundary was never disputed even in 1972. exchange of not to recognize the boundary pillars erected by a good major green and exchange of not from the ministry of minister of foreign affairs of ethiopia is propose and sudan accepted that so there is no boundary di

also the established 2001 boundary commission has worked for the north of the nearly 12 years without discussing any boundary line dispute all we hear about boundary disputes is something novel is this started 2 months ago from this european side otherwise there was not there was an arrangement on the boundary cross boundary cultivation in 1992 more as a time something done i'm very i'm really sorry i don't mean wise and sorry i don't mean to interrupt you but i need to give time to the other guests here i will get back to you to another question in just a moment let me go to samuel right now samuel let me ask you what does ethiopia want to see going forward when it comes to this dispute. i think from the person to her her if your brand if your parents we i think that if you open government wants to keep its borders intact. like i mean to done trying to take advantage of the situation the conflicts that have been ongoing i mean your guest has been mentioning all this agreements and all kinds of stuff that were signed during colonization for other countries so i mean it's just looks li

1944, and for example, and they would be established in london, and the advisory commission became a very diplomatic boundary. andgi8: later the ambassador in soviet union, the united states in the eac, an important decision coming out of tehran. and at the quebec conference the first one, the prime minister, they discussed nuclear weapons, the atomic bombs, the scientific efforts, they would remain an anglo-american monopoly that would not be shared by the soviets.ñpbje"ñ that would be a sore point that the monopoly had not been shared with the soviets into if you think about these many meetings prior to yalta, they were trying to decide on important issues like new international organizations, the united nations, to replace the league of nations that had not been particularly successful collective security organization. and as i said it, many of the issues were worked out. on the united nations issues such as a future general assembly where the four policeman would governor the united nations, the premier powers in the world. they would dominate as the four policeman, it would be a general assembly. one of

the european commission would become a important diplomatic body, where essentially the sown are boundariesor austria are being established. important diplomats like -- represented the united states in the eac, as a important physician coming out of tehran. at the quÉbec conference, the first one, the prime minister churchill and roosevelt also discussed nuclear weapons. the atomic bomb. and they would say that this scientific efforts, the achievements of course, which came to fruition at the end of the war would remain and england american monopoly, and would not be shared by the soviets. that would be a sore point after the war that the information had not been shared with the soviets. so if you think about these many diplomatic meetings prior to yalta, they were trying to decide on important issues like a new international organization to replace the league of nations, which had not been a particularly successful collective security organization. as i had said at the important oaks, many of the issues had been worked out. on the united nations issue, such as eight future general assembly

commission would be established. it became a very important diplomatic body and the boundaries for germany and post-war austria were beinglished. and important diplomats like george k. ken an represented the united states and eac, and so an important decision coming out of tehran. at the quebec conference, the first one the prime minister churchill and roosevelt also discussed nuclear weapons and the atomic bomb, and they would say that this scientific effort, and the achievements that would remain an anglo-american monopoly and would not be shared by the soviets and that would be a fair point after the war that monopoly and that information had not been shared by the soviets. so if you think about these many diplomatic meetings prayer to yalta, they were trying to decide on important issues like new international organizations and the united nations to replace the league of nations which had want been the particularly successful political organization, and as i said, many of the issues and on the united nations issues such as a future general assembly where the four policemen as roosevelt called him would sort of govern