last >> let's talk about what congressman brad sherman posted to me in the last segment.t was really the stopping of swift payments to moscow. we know with that would do, right? this is obviously over oil. we've talked about oil over the last half a century it seems, when it comes to a nation providing oil to the world. the united states as well. what would happen if we go to war to these nations of course in the middle east, the iraq war, afghanistan, and so forth. that's a much bigger conversation. that being said what do you make about stopping these with payments to basketball? which will obviously increase oil prices even higher than they've already gone. you have to have conversations with saudi, as a congressman talked about. the united states saying, you're gonna have to open up the faucet and give to the countries in need. because we're shutting down raw russia to squeeze moscow and make sure that they don't advance. >> i agree fully with congressman sherman's approach to this. the sanctions so far severe, they really are, but they are penalties. if you were to s

darrell issa, if he has a question, and then brad sherman. your bureau was tasked with establishing u.s. policy toward international organizations. one important facet of our participation in the united nations is our commitment to the united nations charter and the body of international law that the u.n. seeks to uphold, including on the rights of migrants. i, along with many of my colleagues, have been alarmed by the biden administration's title 42 order which expels individuals at the southern border. the u.n. high commissioner for refugees says this policy is inconsistent with international norms and may constitute refinement. the former counsel to the state department has affirmed these concerns, saying the title 42 policy "continues to violate our legal obligation to not expel or return individuals who fear persecution, death, or torture." and violates the refugee convention, a foundational treaty for the u.s. work on refugees. he called these deportations "illegal and inhumane." while this is a cdc order, the state department is respon

american politicians, including representative brad sherman, are playing with fire on the korean peninsulain particular, the house resolution serves the interests of north korea and china. the reasons are as follows. the united nations command is a vital platform security -- platform for security and stability on the korean peninsula and has the potential to achieve the liberalization of north korea the korean war is the only case of a united nations command being established. the un command is under the command of the u.s. in the event of a conflict korean peninsula, or even if north korea implodes, the u.s. can mobilize its allies around the world and avoid the slow bureaucratic processes of the un. for this reason, the command and the u.s. serve as the strongest deterrent against north korea and its principal supporter, the chinese communist party. hr 3446 still fully aims to push for the immediate dismantlement of the u.n. command through a so-called treaty that encourages north korea and the ccp to commit more brazen acts by removing the means for the free world to intervene quickly i