and brandeis' uncle was a zionist, so brandeis did not know it at the time. and he first becomes aware of zionism in 1910 when a reporter, jacob dehas, interviews him. brandeis then studies and eventually comes to the conclusion that zionism is a type of idealistic form that he could support. now, he never was religious. he says that his mother did not believe that anyone should be bound to any one religion, rather, they should be aware of and sensitive to all religions and treat them all with respect. he never denied his judaism, but considering he was one of the most successful lawyers in boston, he had very little to do with the jewish community in boston. he made donations to various jewish charities, but they were for the amounts of money he had nominal compared to some of the money he put into other reforms. >> tell us about the dreyfus trial just for a moment. >> alfred dreyfus was a captain in the french army. and there was a scandal in which it was determined that a spy had stolen military secrets for the germans, france's age-old enemies. and dreyfu

completely in back of brandeis. they trusted him. >> speaking of hearings it took six months to get him approved. >> four months. he was a radical. i mean, there's no question about it that as far as conservatives were concerned, this was a man who had attacked j. pchld mop. morgan. had discovered that there was a big scandal regarding conservation and alaskan resources. that the president had lied about what he had done. he supported labor legislation which conservatives found anathema. this was a man who had attacked banking practices as then practiced. and who had attacked the court for being not in touch with current reality by any standard brandeis was a radical. he wasn't an iww time of radical, but as far as the conservatives were concerned he was far worse because he was educated, he was trained and he was effective. you could ignore the real radicals over on the left, you couldn't ignore brandeis. >> 47-22 was the final vote? >> yes. >> and the 22 who voted against him, what party were they in? >> almost al

what i think former justice brandeis used to call the right to be legitimate alone and that we have with the new technology, it's very difficult for the laws to keep up, and i was just wondering what the ftc and you, mr. kerry, what the department of commerce is doing with regard to these issues and if you've had things come up with password issues and the like? you want to start, senator -- >> well, we have some concern, and we've expressed some concern about the practice of employers asking for facebook passwords and have communicate thatd toll that to facebook. facebook, sounds like they're working with you. they've noted this may not be part of their terms of service. so it is something we are concerned about. it may be something, by the way, that -- that isn't within our unfair deceptive acts or practices authority. it's sort of an interesting question we were discussing today before i came up here, but we want to work with you are going forward on your legislation. >> very good. mr. kerry? >> all right. thanks, senator. the relation between the consumers and the companies that they

justice brandeis some time ago said sunlight is the best disinfectant. he was talking in another era about a different issue, but that comment holds to this. without international effort, international focus, without global political will, this problem will not go away. neither will the problems of terrorism or transnational crime, because the connective tissue is the opacity in the financial system. and until organizations like the g20 and others really focus on this, we're going to be talking about this problem for quite a long time. >> do you want to comment, mr. secretary general? >> just briefly, chair. i think the interconnections you talked about are supported by what we observe through the convention. it's supported by what interpol is observing and has passed resolutions on, and is also observed by the u.n. commission on crime prevention and criminal justice and the resolutions they passed on the topic. >> dr. douglas-hamilton, you mentioned doppler rad eed dar p possibility of thinking out of the box. can you fill that in a little bit for us? >

. >> reporter: recent brandeis grad benjamin beutel, who did everything he could to avoid debt, says would resent loan forgiveness. >> i am graduating in three years. one of those years, i went to a state school. suddenly i'll wish that i have had debt because it would have saved my family and myself a lot of trouble. >> reporter: even robert applebaum is committed to paying his loans back. he graduated from fordham law school in 1998 with a $65,000 debt that grew-- unpaid interest added to principal-- to $88,000 when he deferred payments to work a low-paying public service job. >> ever since i left the d.a.s. office in 2004, i've been in repayment, i have not missed a single payment, nor do i intend to. i have never defaulted, nor do i intend to. >> reporter: but he has motivations besides morality. >> student loans are treated unlike any other type of debt in america meaning they have no consumer protections. no bankruptcy protections, no statute of limitations on the collections of those debts. >> they can garnish up to 15% of your wages without a court order. >> reporter: mark ka

the outlook for college grads and other young adults, we turn to catherine mann, professor at the brandeis international business school. and paul harrington, director of drexel university's center for labor markets and policy, which advises student career-planning organizations and consults with companies on theirirg nes. well, catherine mann, not a great report this month, right. give us an overview. >> right, jeff t was a little bit soft it was certainly much less than was expected by the consensus was for 1 of 0,000. we only ended up -- 160,000, we ended up with 130 at the private sector. i think that where we really saw some softnesses with in some sectors that in the past have been the robust once. there was softness in the temporary worker category. there was softness in health. there was softness in hospitality. all of those sectors actually added about half as many jobs as they had added over previous months. on the other hand, there were some bright spots too. business professional and technical continued to be robust. so generally speaking, not what we would hope to see at this

my father, you know, subscribed to justice brandeis' mantra that sunlight is the best disinfectant.and that seeing just ordinary americans come forward and speak these words out loud is a step of acknowledging the wrong that happened. and it's the fact that ordinary americans are stepping forward to do it or the obama administration may not be willing to do it, so the american people are stepping forward and doing it. >> the test of character is what you -- how you respond when you realize that you've gone astray. and i do think that this country, historically, has had an ability to examine, you know, when it's critical. and make apologies and make adjustments. the question is what happens if we don't, you know? and i think in this case to not examine these things and to not reckon with them is first of all, to reward bad leadership. because i think real story is there was bad leadership. that these guys weren't operating in a vacuum having to make stuff up on their own. they were ignoring good advice that was saying, don't do these things. it doesn't work. you know? when, if that's

make clear the data that people in tend to have to be private is private, which reformer justice brandeisused all the right to be left alone and the we have with a new technology it's difficult for the law to keep up and i was just wondering what the ftc and human the department of commerce are doing with regard to these issues and if you have had things come up with password issues and the like if you want to start, senator. >> well, we have some concern and we've expressed some concern about the practice of employers asking for facebook passwords and we have communicated that to facebook cruditÉs facebook said it sounds like they are working with you. they also noted that this may not be a part of their terms of service so it is something we are concerned about and it may be something by the way that isn't within our own fear deceptive acts or authority it's an interesting question we were discussing today before i came up here but we want to work with you going forward on your legislation. >> very good. >> thank you, senator klobuchar. our proposal was focused on the relationship betwe

>> there is no blank a pool on miranda-- brandeis in. >> i think that is a good answer.imes i think maybe it is the best thing to do. sometimes i think maybe it is not. >> the policy that has been laid out, the exception to the miranda rule, dashed. >> how long can you hold someone under the case before you have to read them you have to read them their brander writes? >> i think that is an open question. >> is a today's? >> an open question. >> i would suggest that the people that we held at guantÁnamo bay for years as enemy combatants can only be held out long because we designated them as combatants. i don't want to bastard out the criminal justice system. once music, i wanted to work the way it should. and i believe if you capture someone, in the united states, and you are going to charge them with a crime and article three in court, that is your intent, that your ability to hold them without aggrandizing them under court is limited, but how long can you hold someone that you want to put into the criminal justice system without presenting them to a federal court under

justice brandeis a long time ago said sunlight is the best disinfectant. he was talking in another era about a different issue, but that comment holds to this. without international effort, international focus, there's no global political will, this problem will not go away. neither will the problems of terrorism or transnational crime, because the connective tissue is the opacity and the financial system, and until organizations like the g-20 and others really focus on this, we are going to be talking about this problem for quite a long time. >> comment, mr. secretary-general? >> just briefly. i think the interconnections you talked about are supported by what we observed through the convention. it's supported by what is being observed and is also observed by the u.n. commission on crime prevention and criminal justice and the resolutions they passed on the topic. >> dr. hamilton, you mentioned doing ma anti-possibility of thinking out of the box, can you just fill that in a little bit for us? >> i think the dogma have the intellectual resources, i know s