now district 6 and ultimately migrated to where it has been for over half a century at sixth and brannan streets. this is a institution that is in in -- linked to san francisco. it is linked to families whose lives have changed over time who live in san mateo counties and other counties who grow the product, bring it to market in the middle of the night. if any of you have not been there, i urge and commend you to go there at the crack of dawn at 3 or 4 in the morning. it is the second largest wholesale flower market in the united states of america. the south of market is changing. supervisor kim presided over some of those changes. supervisor haney is now presiding over the changes. their predecessor daly presided over the changes as downtown moved south and central soma is where that action is happening today. the kilroy corporation did what the academy of art that is on our agenda later today could not do, which is to assemble the japanese and italian sides of that flower market and propose a massive office development. i stepped in -- i forgot what year, i think 2015, i forget what y

exhibits attached to this agreement that i am updating today that include the legal description of brannan street property. the updated impact fecal consultations, the key allegations under the tri-part agreement. reflected in a post development lease negotiated with the flower market. >> supervisor peskin: that was pretty truncated. so why don't we start with the tri-party agreement which is an agreement between the flower market, the killroy corporation and the vendors who were 50 in number but represented by a subset of those 50. is there anything that that tri-party agreement as originally stated or subsequently stated -- and maybe this is not a question for you because you're not a party, nor is the city to that, but it's incorporated by reference, that would prevent as i earlier stated, any member, any vendor, from expressing him or herself publicly to petition their government to talk to the press? >> my understanding -- >> supervisor peskin: i'm not asking about the d.a. i'll ask ms. dietrich. >> my understanding of that agreement has been struck and eliminated from the tri-party a

additional cites exceptions for the flower mart site located on the southern half of the block north of brannan street and item 24 is an ordinance to approve a developer to agreement between the city and county of san francisco and the flower mart for the development of an approximately six weight 5-acre site located at fifth street and brennan street -- 6.5-acre site. >> thank you. i have spent about a decade of my life on this institution that has existed for over 100 years and i have a lot to say. having said that, and i think we are close and i would like to commend the parties and particularly the office of economic and workforce development, and within that office, there is still language that is absolutely unsatisfactory to this supervisor, which i'm happy to talk about, but until i understand that that language has been corrected, for -- in the beginning, the history of this town and this market were inextricably linked and they have remained that way since late 18 hundreds. and as our downtown has grown and expanded, expanded the original flower market that was co- like it -- located b